Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: David Taylor
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 54 next>>
Jan 2, 2021 12:57:22   #
ted smith wrote:
You should have edited your title.


Who are you talking to?
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:54:56   #
Longshadow wrote:
Not all of us can take perfect pictures that we feel need no post processing.
Some like to see if the images may be enhanced.
Simply a tool.


Some.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:54:29   #
mwsilvers wrote:
Wow, you really seem clueless on this subject. I honestly do not intend this to be insulting but you seem blind to what many other people can see.


You do not know what I know.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:53:17   #
controversy wrote:
Since all camera sensors (including yours) ONLY capture raw files that can then be post-processed and saved as jpgs according to the in-camera post-processing settings/options YOU have chosen, does that mean you're "hiding behind post-processing," too?


No.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:43:05   #
mwsilvers wrote:
Do you really not understand that your JPEGs are also post processed from raw data within your camera with a very limited number of post-processing tools over which you have very little control? If you do not understand that then you do not really know much about how a modern camera works.


Fully aware, thank you. I can still see you hiding.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:41:45   #
Urnst wrote:
I took pictures with my Pen F one day but the next day its dead: it won"t turn on. Changed the battery but that didn't help. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions for repair? Thanking you in advance.


Any minute now, someone will suggest shooting raw instead of jpeg will cure it...
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:35:36   #
You're all hiding behind post processing.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:32:07   #
jackm1943 wrote:
I agree. Because many threads go way off track by page 2 or 3, I usually prefer to respond to OPs before reading the replies, even if it does result in some redundancies.


What! I can't believe I missed the name calling!
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 12:23:07   #
lamiaceae wrote:
I know what SOOC is supposed to mean but like the rest of this thread I took it to mean actual prints with no processing beyond the initial light and chemical changes to the media and outside of operator control. Meaning some sort of film or paper based instant photography. I'm I limited to discussing impractical techniques when others are also talking hypothetically? My reply was rhetorical though not sarcastic.

Also I don't look for imaginary HTML tags with abbreviated titles. This was in the main section not the attic.
I know what SOOC is supposed to mean but like the ... (show quote)


Ok. I don't think I can help explain his sarcastic post any better.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 11:48:10   #
Yes, use raw to cover up your inadequacies.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 11:44:22   #
Delderby wrote:
Artist maybe - but doesn't AI turn artists into p1ss artists?


Go to
Jan 2, 2021 10:50:37   #
lamiaceae wrote:
I was just going to say that.

Also the only thing that is SOOC are Polaroids.


You missed the fact that David Martin was being sarcastic. Hence the /sarc tag.
The data that displays as an image is SOOC.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 10:47:21   #
jlg1000 wrote:
Whoa! Where do you get Polaroids packs?


Lol. Although Fujifilm actually do make instant film and cameras. (Instax).
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 10:45:08   #
mwsilvers wrote:
That is correct. Like any other tool, one has to learn when and how to get the best results with post-processing software. Many people overdo it and create something. far worse than the original. In my experience most of them those are neither good photographers nor skilled in post-processing.

However, many of us understand exposure, composition, color, light and shadow, texture, line, and shape within the photographic context and are skilled using good quality post processing software. When used appropriately post processing can take an image from very good to spectacular.
That is correct. Like any other tool, one has to l... (show quote)


Which is exactly what the OP understood.
Go to
Jan 2, 2021 10:10:02   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Worse is in the eye of the beholder.

As long as I like the result, that's all that matters.


True.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 54 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.