Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How Many Lenses Are Really Needed?
Page <<first <prev 8 of 14 next> last>>
Mar 14, 2019 10:26:55   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
dsmeltz wrote:
I use the lens less photoed by, and that has made all the difference.



Reply
Mar 14, 2019 10:31:40   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
John Maher wrote:
Good question.

Rephrased: What lens do you use most and why (purpose)?

This can assist new users in "prioritizing" their purchases. Some may never get into a specialty (e.g., macro), and others may expand to include it later. Some uses may overlap, leading to a common "best choice".

It keeps going back to that basic question: What are you going to photograph?


Not disagreeing, but that should be a new topic with an appropriate title. It is not going to assist anyone lost in the middle of this thread.

It is your idea, I hope you follow through.

---

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 10:38:50   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
dsmeltz wrote:
I use the lens less photoed by, and that has made all the difference.


Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2019 10:40:01   #
olemikey Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
 
Mac wrote:
Other than for professional photographers (those who earn their living through photography) how many lenses are really needed? On full frame camera is anything more than a 35mm or 50mm and a specialty lens, ie a telephoto, or macro, or something else depending on the focus of interest really needed? I know that lens manufacturers want us to think we do, but do we really?


As many as you want, really. I only need a couple of focal length ranges covered, but I have a literal trunk full of lenses going back to the 80's. Built a collection of working lenses for modern gear buying used lenses and bodies. Some only come out once in a while, but I keep em clean and can drop one on a body anytime and use it. Mine cover many Nikon, Sony, Minolta, Tokina, Sigma, Tamron, Vivitar, Braun, and others. Some I have sold and later regretted, but same could be said for old cars/trucks/Jeeps/motorcycles I've owned.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 10:53:56   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
RichardSM wrote:
Do I detect some jealousy here Mac? I would think if folks (Photographers) wish to own lots of lens it’s there business and why do you bring this up?


No jealousy. I own many lenses. If you read my previous responses in this thread you will see my reasons for asking.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 11:07:59   #
BOB WETHERELL
 
Good topic and helpful replys.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 11:24:58   #
lonewolf456
 
I guess because he wants answers and opinions.

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2019 11:30:02   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
I use 3. EFS 15-85, EF 70-300, and Tamron 150-600mm G2. I haven't found the reason to want more, however time will tell.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 11:33:16   #
Peteso Loc: Blacks Hills
 
It depends on the type of photography you do, regardless of whether you’re a pro or not. For example, events, landscape, sports, wildlife, macro, low light, etc. require different lenses.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 11:36:30   #
Paul J. Svetlik Loc: Colorado
 
24 - 105
The rest of them stay usually home.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 11:44:44   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Mac wrote:
Other than for professional photographers (those who earn their living through photography) how many lenses are really needed? On full frame camera is anything more than a 35mm or 50mm and a specialty lens, ie a telephoto, or macro, or something else depending on the focus of interest really needed? I know that lens manufacturers want us to think we do, but do we really?

I know, I "kinda" have too many (clutter), but I don't want to miss a single one ( I have over 20).

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2019 11:46:16   #
ronaldwrightdallas
 
I only need one of each lens made to fit my camera. oh, also for my second camera.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 12:04:54   #
Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
 
Mac wrote:
Other than for professional photographers (those who earn their living through photography) how many lenses are really needed? On full frame camera is anything more than a 35mm or 50mm and a specialty lens, ie a telephoto, or macro, or something else depending on the focus of interest really needed? I know that lens manufacturers want us to think we do, but do we really?


Depends on the kind of photography you like to do. I am kind of a generalist And the lenses I use regularly (for a FF camera) are a wide angle, a normal and a medium telephoto (all primes). The lenses I use less often (speciality lenses) are two long teles and a macro. The lenses (and bodies) that fall out of favor I give away rather than let them collect dust or sell at deep disounts.

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 12:13:07   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Abosutely. You have made my day. Great poem that influenced my wording.
“One could do worse than be a swinger of birches”


I to love Robert Frost!

The way a crow shook down on me
A dust snow from a hemlock tree
Has touched my heart and changed my mood
And saved some part of a day I had rued!

Reply
Mar 14, 2019 12:23:00   #
Leeo Loc: Oregon
 
Any lens that makes you happy! All my lens make me happy. A lens that doesn't function makes me sad. Gone are the days when I would use a fruit juice can, on my camera body and turn my 50mm 1.2 lens backward to shoot macro. Now I have an M2. I am happy.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.