Which one do you prefer ??
Mar 11, 2019 08:16:12 #
Ava'sPapa wrote:
A few years back we were returning from a cruise early in the morning and I didn't want to miss this opportunity. For the first one I had the camera resting on the railing and hence the intended shake. The other two were just hand held. The third one would've been my favorite if I hadn't chopped the antennae off. You tell me. IF, you like any of them.
No. 2 has the most interest.
Mar 11, 2019 08:19:09 #
#3 has a soft, painting-like effect and coloring that I find to be very pleasing. I'd do a bit of cropping to remove the half building on the far right and the water line seems to be tilting a bit, but apart from that it's my favorite of the set.
Mar 11, 2019 08:52:29 #
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Mar 11, 2019 09:35:15 #
The middle one. The lights on the buildings, etc. really add some dimension to the photograph.
--Bob
--Bob
Ava'sPapa wrote:
A few years back we were returning from a cruise early in the morning and I didn't want to miss this opportunity. For the first one I had the camera resting on the railing and hence the intended shake. The other two were just hand held. The third one would've been my favorite if I hadn't chopped the antennae off. You tell me. IF, you like any of them.
Mar 11, 2019 09:37:42 #
In spite of it's obvious problem, I would hang no.3 on my wall.
Mar 11, 2019 09:53:43 #
Mar 11, 2019 10:41:23 #
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Mar 11, 2019 10:54:59 #
Mar 11, 2019 14:43:16 #
nervous2 wrote:
Number 3, by far, for me. I too miss the antenna but the shot has an almost abstract feel to it. I like the way the light plays on Ms. Liberty as well. I see I'm in the minority so far, but hey, what's new about that?
I agree
Mar 11, 2019 14:55:09 #
Mar 11, 2019 15:04:33 #
With some post-processing you can make #2 a great photo. Don't know what you have for post-processing but you need to get rid of some of the haze and then adjust your histogram for sharpness.
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Mar 11, 2019 16:34:46 #
I took the liberty (hope it's alright with the photographer,) of trying to do just as you suggested... I'm am NOT too competent with Photoshop, that is why I thought it might be good practice... Attached is ther revised (#2) image..
LESTAHL wrote:
With some post-processing you can make #2 a great photo. Don't know what you have for post-processing but you need to get rid of some of the haze and then adjust your histogram for sharpness.
Mar 11, 2019 18:35:10 #
Mar 11, 2019 20:02:21 #
What do you think? I believe it is improved considerably. But you did get some practice with Photoshop. you can play with Photoshop and keep the original in order to keep playing. I use Photoshop Elements because it is much faster than Photoshop for me. I only use it for photography and that is what Elements was designed for.
Mar 11, 2019 20:54:22 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.