Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
The "Angry Photographer"
Page <<first <prev 6 of 14 next> last>>
Feb 27, 2019 10:24:34   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
The Angry Photographer is not stupid, far from it; and he knows camera gear and lenses. But, he enjoys being judgemental, often negative for effect (Sigma lenses). He is arrogant to a fault, but with some good reason. Like any camera guy, one should watch him for information and knowledge, but take him with a big grain of salt. He loves to hear himself talk, and spends far too much time repeating himself, re-phrasing what he has previously said; and then saying it again. He will talk for 15 minutes to say what could be said in five. I will continue to consider his opinions after suffering the through his presentations.
The Angry Photographer is not stupid, far from it;... (show quote)

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 As will I.

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:38:41   #
Dan Ausec
 
graybeard wrote:
You Tube's "Angry Photographer" says that Sigma lenses are all pure junk. End of story. Just junk. He also rarely even mention's Canon, and he often goes off topic into long rants. Any comments ??


Ken Wheeler has saved me thousands of $ over the last couple of years..on his recommendations of buying used quality lenses and flashes, he has always been spot on..I never heard of Used Photo Pro (Roberts Camera) before I saw his recommendation..what a first class company..yes..he can be abrasive, rude, and he always repeats himself, but the man is very intelligent on numerous subjects..he has no affiliate links, ( which he repeats quite often), so he could care less whether you buy what he recommends or not..yes..he mainly shoots Nikon and Fuji, but he doesn't hesitate to criticize either company when it is deserved..I would rather take the advice of someone like him with years and years of experience and who actually buys and uses what he comments on with zero financial gain than another who has their hands in your back pocket..ok...rant over :)

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:40:17   #
richardsaccount
 
Wheeler knows his Nikon and Fujifilm equipment quite well. However, besides his vulgar language, his cocksure attitude of his opinions, mainly the negative ones is annoying. He likes to pick on Leica products a lot. He claims that one of their $15,000 lenses is plagued with bent iris blade issues. If this is true I'm certain Leica would have rectified it. Also, one video he portrayed himself a a typical Leica user. He was sitting at his table wearing some odd large black hat
and pretending to smoke a Meersham pipe. I never ran across any Leica user well healed or not that fit his portrayal. In a video he posted a couple of days ago he stated that Leica will soon be out of business. He has also in the past said that Pentax cameras are goners or they will be bought by the Chinese. In one video he had the gall to poke fun at the late artist Bob Ross. He donned an Afro wig and tried to mimic his speech by talking in muted tones. Why? .
I replied to that video by saying that it has been said hat the dead cannot defend themselves and that they have no rights and he proved both those points well.
I believe he removed my response. Small doses of him is best.

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Feb 27, 2019 10:40:24   #
Dan Ausec
 
rjaywallace wrote:
I respectfully disagree. Theoria Apophasis (aka Ken Wheeler) is one of the most knowledgeable and professional photographic bloggers currently publishing. I’m sure others will disagree, especially those whose gear he demeaned. He makes a practice of acquiring lenses he plans to evaluate and does not accept favors or gratuities from manufacturers or major vendors. In short, he is nobody’s “boy” and nobody’s fool. He is aware he has many detractors and, frankly Scarlet, does not give a darn. He calls it like he sees it after detailed in-depth analysis. I respect his opinions despite his rants.
I respectfully disagree. Theoria Apophasis (aka K... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:41:08   #
Dan Ausec
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
The Angry Photographer is not stupid, far from it; and he knows camera gear and lenses. But, he enjoys being judgemental, often negative for effect (Sigma lenses). He is arrogant to a fault, but with some good reason. Like any camera guy, one should watch him for information and knowledge, but take him with a big grain of salt.
He loves to hear himself talk, and spends far too much time repeating himself, re-phrasing what he has previously said; and then saying it again. He will talk for 15 minutes to say what could be said in five.
I will continue to consider his opinions after suffering the through his presentations.
The Angry Photographer is not stupid, far from it;... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:42:48   #
Dan Ausec
 
throughrhettseyes wrote:
As a teacher he repeats his point over and over to get you to remember what he said.



Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:43:27   #
Dan Ausec
 
twice_shooter wrote:
I’ve watched most of his posts. He is entertaining. He is spot on with his recommendations. I’ve purchased several lenses based on his reviews and I’ve not been disappointed. The Nikon 200-500 comes to mind and that one is stellar. He was one of the first to tout the Fuji 16 mm lens. No regrets in buying that one... it is a phenomenal lens! All in all he is my go to guy on recos.



Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Feb 27, 2019 10:45:22   #
Dan Ausec
 
vma wrote:
I think after years of working on camera’s repairing & testing, he really knows his photography equipment. He won’t put you to sleep with facts. If I’m buying a new camera or lens I look up his utube comments first.



Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:47:47   #
Dan Ausec
 
chrisg-optical wrote:
Yes I am a big fan of his - although I don't agree with everything he says - at the very least some of his videos are very entertaining...truth be told he is one of the few if only really blunt honest photography YouTube channels out there - many of the others have highly polished videos, professionally posted and edited, nice expensive sets and props, but they are nothing more than expensive excuses for affiliate links and self promotion and sometimes disinformation and highly biased opinion...you know the big hair guy, the DxO guy, and others. Ken is very knowledgeable and is also into esoteric subjects such as metaphysics and philosophy....fun to watch! His lens recommendations are silk, sex and sugar! The epic tits! The cat's ass!

Other than Ken W I also like to watch Steve Perry's videos and real world tests...very honest too with better vernacular (rated G). There are a few others that are good but can't remember their names offhand....

Regarding Sigma right now I really only trust 2 lens makers on my Nikon - Nikon and Tamron....although certain Sigma lenses I am sure are very good, the problem may be in the mechanical design (aperture blades) rather than the optics which in most cases are very good. But it also is very dependent on personal experience with the brand...so I can't really speak to that since the last Sigma lens I used was in the film days in the 80s and 90s on Olympus bodies.

Regarding Canon I know he poopoos on certain models and in his opinion Canon is 40 good /60 bad. He believes Nikon is the reverse 60/40....but it's his experience and opinion - your mileage may vary!
Yes I am a big fan of his - although I don't agree... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:54:02   #
Cookie223 Loc: New Jersey
 
Black Elk Peak wrote:
A foul mouthed fool, oaf, nincompoop, clown, dunce, dolt, dullard, ignoramus, simpleton; informalidiot, cretin, imbecile, nitwit, halfwit, ninny, dope, dimwit, dumbo, dummy, ass, jerk, nerd, dum-dum, loon, chump, goon, jackass, fathead, blockhead, numbskull, dunderhead, meathead, dipstick, bonehead, chucklehead, clod, goop, knucklehead, lamebrain, peabrain, pudding-head, thickhead, wooden-head, pinhead, airhead, birdbrain, dumbbell, donkey, stupe, noodle.

Couldn't watch more than 30 seconds.



Vaughan K.
A foul mouthed fool, oaf, nincompoop, clown, dunce... (show quote)


So it’s safe to say you didn’t like him! 🤣🤣🤣

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:54:23   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Dan Ausec wrote:
Ken Wheeler has saved me thousands of $ over the last couple of years..on his recommendations of buying used quality lenses and flashes, he has always been spot on..I never heard of Used Photo Pro (Roberts Camera) before I saw his recommendation..what a first class company..yes..he can be abrasive, rude, and he always repeats himself, but the man is very intelligent on numerous subjects..he has no affiliate links, ( which he repeats quite often), so he could care less whether you buy what he recommends or not..yes..he mainly shoots Nikon and Fuji, but he doesn't hesitate to criticize either company when it is deserved..I would rather take the advice of someone like him with years and years of experience and who actually buys and uses what he comments on with zero financial gain than another who has their hands in your back pocket..ok...rant over :)
Ken Wheeler has saved me thousands of $ over the l... (show quote)


Dan, he makes money being on YouTube. Don’t for a second think that these guys are doing videos out of their good hearts.

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Feb 27, 2019 10:58:39   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
I bought a lens based on his recommendation. I was not at all concerned about his style just the convincing data he presented. The data included real photos.

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 10:58:39   #
Mr palmer Loc: Currently: Colorado, USA, Terra, Sol
 
Nope.

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 11:00:36   #
dugeeeeeee
 
He’s opinionated crass and rude. He’d make and excellent hogger! He loves Nikon and Fuji. So do I. I have some sigma lenses that I like fine. There is more than one opinion (way more) on everything. I also read these blogs watch the fro, backcountry gallery, tony and Chelsea, 3 men and an elephant and some Asian guy I can’t remember right now. Take it all in and make your own informed decision.

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 11:12:16   #
Tommy II Loc: Northern Illinois
 
graybeard wrote:
You Tube's "Angry Photographer" says that Sigma lenses are all pure junk. End of story. Just junk. He also rarely even mention's Canon, and he often goes off topic into long rants. Any comments ??


Obviously an over opinionated jerk.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.