Olympus OMD camera’s. The new one just out is VERY pricey. I have the OMD Olympus e-m5 Mark II with 5 axis stabilization in camera. It’s amazing what this 70-year old lady can hand hold. It’s also weather and dust proof. My camera is a micro 4/3s and even with the Oly 14-150 II lens on it it weighs less than my old Nikon 70-200 lens. The newest Olympus weighs a lot more, I think 2 lbs.
The reason you are struggling is complicated. One reason that keeping a camera horizontal is difficult is looking through a viewfinder causes you to refocus your entire world. Your visual perception of a definite horizon is now extremely important for your sense of balance. Every time you refocus you need to reestablish that visual horizon, it is now essential for your sense of balance. While looking through a viewfinder, that is next to impossible. Closing one eye and looking through a viewfinder is disastrous for someone with either an inner ear related or stroke related balance disorder. Instead of using a viewfinder, focusing with ‘live view’ on a screen may help you. Keeping both eyes open while focusing will help. Using a monopod will help. I recommend a Panasonic or Olympus 4/3, like so many above, for the image stabilization. Using a camera will actually be good therapy for your imbalance disorder. Because of that, I’d leave the tripod at home. Enjoy.
What about using a carbon fiber monopod in place of your walking stick?
olemikey
Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
Good stuff, was just reading about the new Pany with 7.5 via dual IS, pretty cool.
burkphoto wrote:
Best options are found in Micro 4/3. Panasonic G9 with Dual IS 2 compatible lenses adds In Body Image Stabilization to In-Lens Image Stabilization (IBIS + ILIS = Dual IS 2 with 6.5 stops of shake reduction). And the just announced Olympus E-M1X is supposedly even better (7.5 stops of shake reduction).
Micro 4/3 *systems* are 60 to 80 percent lighter (body plus three lenses) than their full frame counterparts. (i.e.; the BODIES aren't much lighter, but the weight savings come from smaller, shorter, lighter lenses that yield similar results.)
Best options are found in Micro 4/3. Panasonic G9 ... (
show quote)
I have a strong rt hand shake and find a small SLR with a 24 120 is lens better for balance than my mirrorless cameras-which need to be held out to get the quickest picture and give greater shake-I know use the eye viewer but it seems to take longer. Also the SLR seems to focus quicker and shoot quicker. I get shots between shakes which occur every second or so- the SLR is a Nikon d3400 it just is faster and has facial support also. The shake is way to great taking more than a second and I also shoot with high s. speed. Which helps. Good luck-I use a tripod and remote shutter with birds from inside during winter. Then the Oly oM 5d mirrorless works great. Very quick. Hope this helps!
olemikey wrote:
Good stuff, was just reading about the new Pany with 7.5 via dual IS, pretty cool.
That's an Olympus. But beyond five stops of IS, you're just bragging...
Olympus started putting IS into their lenses only within the last couple of years. But they still have the steadiest cameras around.
At some point, I'm told the wobble of the Earth itself is the limiting factor.
wobbly1 wrote:
Hello ALL!
I have been reading the posts here for over a year and you all seem to be very savvy. I love taking photos and learned a lot using a Pentax K1000. Fast forward to about 10 years ago, when I was rear-ended and my head trauma led to a total loss of balance. I have done lots of rehab, and have been using a Canon PowerShot S3IS, which seems to work for me because of the image stabilization. I think DSLRs may be out of the question because I just can't stabilize myself enough for a clear picture. Does anyone know of any better options? I take a lot of flower, landscape, and travel photos. I don't think I can manage a heavy camera with lots of lens, because I have to use walking sticks when I'm out on the trail. Thanks in advance!
Hello ALL! br I have been reading the posts here ... (
show quote)
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-236741-1.html..
My "minipod" bodypod in action
(
Download)
Floyd
Loc: Misplaced Texan in Florence, Alabama
wobbly1 wrote:
Hello ALL!
I have been reading the posts here for over a year and you all seem to be very savvy. I love taking photos and learned a lot using a Pentax K1000. Fast forward to about 10 years ago, when I was rear-ended and my head trauma led to a total loss of balance. I have done lots of rehab, and have been using a Canon PowerShot S3IS, which seems to work for me because of the image stabilization. I think DSLRs may be out of the question because I just can't stabilize myself enough for a clear picture. Does anyone know of any better options? I take a lot of flower, landscape, and travel photos. I don't think I can manage a heavy camera with lots of lens, because I have to use walking sticks when I'm out on the trail. Thanks in advance!
Hello ALL! br I have been reading the posts here ... (
show quote)
All Sony DSLR Cameras have stabilization in the body-not the lens. IMHO, Sony bodies, even with built-in stabilization, are lighter than the other makes.
Floyd wrote:
All Sony DSLR Cameras have stabilization in the body-not the lens. IMHO, Sony bodies, even with built-in stabilization, are lighter than the other makes.
Body weight doesn't count if your lenses are heavy. SYSTEM size and weight counts if you're traveling or walking, or if you fatigue easily. Sony's top G lenses are among the heaviest of their kind.
Native designs of lenses for APS-C can be 1/3 to 1/2 the weight of full frame field of view equivalents.
Native Micro 4/3 lenses can be 1/4 to 1/3 the weight of full frame field of view equivalents.
You lose a stop of performance in low light with APS-C gear, and you lose two stops of performance in low light with Micro 4/3 gear, all other things being equal. Life is full of little trade-offs... Pick your poison.
billnikon wrote:
Best image stabilization is still called a TRIPOD.
I've had better success with a good beanbag. When (if) placed on a firm unyielding surface a beanbag seems to dampen mirror shake better than even a good tripod. I use rice in several 3/4 full zip lock plastic bags for beanbag filler.
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
wobbly1 wrote:
Hello ALL!
I have been reading the posts here for over a year and you all seem to be very savvy. I love taking photos and learned a lot using a Pentax K1000. Fast forward to about 10 years ago, when I was rear-ended and my head trauma led to a total loss of balance. I have done lots of rehab, and have been using a Canon PowerShot S3IS, which seems to work for me because of the image stabilization. I think DSLRs may be out of the question because I just can't stabilize myself enough for a clear picture. Does anyone know of any better options? I take a lot of flower, landscape, and travel photos. I don't think I can manage a heavy camera with lots of lens, because I have to use walking sticks when I'm out on the trail. Thanks in advance!
Hello ALL! br I have been reading the posts here ... (
show quote)
Wobbly … seems as though - one person mentions what they think would be good for you, and the rest have all chimed in. Whilst the Olympus models seem to be a good option, with a couple providing dual stabilization … it seems to me, just lateral stabilization is not going to help you much, with your current predicament. What you need, is something with FIVE-WAY image stabilization - which corrects not only lateral movement and up/down movement, but also circular movement - something with which your loss of balance issue - is all too familiar to you. I also have that problem (a side effect of diabetes) and I'm fully aware of the issues you're facing. My solution has been to migrate to cameras which have built-in body stabilization, like all the Pentax and Sony models. However, 5-way stabilization has only been the province of the big cameras, until recently. The Sony a6500, however, an APS-C Mirror-less compact - DOES have 5-way Image Stabilization. It is also quite light, and will allow for the quality images associated with the APS-C design. Also, I think, if you got it with the 16-50 Kit Lens, you'd find it more than ample hardware for 75% of shooting situations. It's not cheap, however …. around $1600 w/ lens.
Wobbly … just checked prices for you - it's $1600 at Best Buy, and just $1430 at Amazon. BTW, forgot to mention, before - it comes with an adjustable wrist strap, so you can tighten it all the way to the wrist. This way, it's always there, and you can focus on keeping yourself steady with your other hardware - ok?
bwana
Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
wobbly1 wrote:
Hello ALL!
I have been reading the posts here for over a year and you all seem to be very savvy. I love taking photos and learned a lot using a Pentax K1000. Fast forward to about 10 years ago, when I was rear-ended and my head trauma led to a total loss of balance. I have done lots of rehab, and have been using a Canon PowerShot S3IS, which seems to work for me because of the image stabilization. I think DSLRs may be out of the question because I just can't stabilize myself enough for a clear picture. Does anyone know of any better options? I take a lot of flower, landscape, and travel photos. I don't think I can manage a heavy camera with lots of lens, because I have to use walking sticks when I'm out on the trail. Thanks in advance!
Hello ALL! br I have been reading the posts here ... (
show quote)
I love both the Sony RX10 III and IV for their image stabilization and 24-600 zoom lens. I also carry a monopod that doubles as a walking stick.
bwa
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.