Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Smooth Waterfalls Handheld
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 26, 2018 02:49:10   #
rcdovala
 
For some time, I've been wondering if it's possible to replicate a smooth waterfall taken at a slow shutter speed on a tripod but handheld instead. The idea is to handhold a camera while photographing a waterfall but use continuous shooting to expose approximately 10 images keeping the camera a steady as possible. Then using Photoshop import these 10 images into a stack and average the photos. The technique is identical to stacking photos and averaging to reduce noise. I have included an image to show some preliminary results of this technique. In this case, I have only used 3 images. The images were aligned, stacked then averaged. I had these 3 images on hand. I was in the hospital for 6 days with pneumonia and I'm still not fit to go out and experiment by capturing more images of the same subject. However, I've included the final result of averaging the 3 images and I hope that it will encourage others to try this technique. Let me know what you think. I realize that the photo is far from a polished image.


(Download)

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 04:02:43   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
rcdovala wrote:
For some time, I've been wondering if it's possible to replicate a smooth waterfall taken at a slow shutter speed on a tripod but handheld instead. The idea is to handhold a camera while photographing a waterfall but use continuous shooting to expose approximately 10 images keeping the camera a steady as possible. Then using Photoshop import these 10 images into a stack and average the photos. The technique is identical to stacking photos and averaging to reduce noise. I have included an image to show some preliminary results of this technique. In this case, I have only used 3 images. The images were aligned, stacked then averaged. I had these 3 images on hand. I was in the hospital for 6 days with pneumonia and I'm still not fit to go out and experiment by capturing more images of the same subject. However, I've included the final result of averaging the 3 images and I hope that it will encourage others to try this technique. Let me know what you think. I realize that the photo is far from a polished image.
For some time, I've been wondering if it's possibl... (show quote)

Yep, that is a common practice when shooting handheld!

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 04:20:26   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
Looks good...

Reply
 
 
Dec 26, 2018 04:36:18   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
Good result.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 05:08:23   #
Doddy Loc: Barnard Castle-England
 
Great outcome.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 05:36:56   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Photo end result is excellent, however you did not tell the whole story. EXIF shows f=16 and S 1/15 sec. [right?]

You have a steady hand taking 1/15 sec photos, but would it not have been OK to use a higher speed as typically needed for those with vibrating hands. Since you are stacking, the moving part of the resulting photo would have been blurred and the fixed part sharp, which was your goal.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 06:24:11   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Good result

Reply
 
 
Dec 26, 2018 06:43:23   #
ELNikkor
 
Never tried photo stacking, but this result gives it a lot of credence. Hope you recover soon from your illness.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 07:51:49   #
dumbo
 
Beautiful. Well done. Going through the Norwegian Fjords a few years ago, there were some beautiful water falls.
Please tell me how to "stack" and then average without using Photoshop, if that's possible.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 09:40:46   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
I learned something new! Thank you.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 09:57:06   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
dumbo wrote:
Beautiful. Well done. Going through the Norwegian Fjords a few years ago, there were some beautiful water falls.
Please tell me how to "stack" and then average without using Photoshop, if that's possible.


I would like to learn this as well but I don't have Photoshop, I have Affinity...will have to youtube how to do this with that program! I love the image as well.

Reply
 
 
Dec 26, 2018 10:55:22   #
rcarol
 
dpullum wrote:
Photo end result is excellent, however you did not tell the whole story. EXIF shows f=16 and S 1/15 sec. [right?]

You have a steady hand taking 1/15 sec photos, but would it not have been OK to use a higher speed as typically needed for those with vibrating hands. Since you are stacking, the moving part of the resulting photo would have been blurred and the fixed part sharp, which was your goal.


I was using photos I had on hand for my experiment. I was using IBIS and as I recall, a somewhat wide angle of view. Perhaps a higher shutter speed would work but certainly would have required more images to average.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 11:52:36   #
rcarol
 
dumbo wrote:
Beautiful. Well done. Going through the Norwegian Fjords a few years ago, there were some beautiful water falls.
Please tell me how to "stack" and then average without using Photoshop, if that's possible.


I'm not sure if it is possible to do this outside of Photoshop.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 11:53:50   #
rcarol
 
bsprague wrote:
I learned something new! Thank you.


You're welcome. I think that it has potential.

Reply
Dec 26, 2018 12:04:58   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
CindyHouk wrote:
I would like to learn this as well but I don't have Photoshop, I have Affinity...will have to youtube how to do this with that program! I love the image as well.


You can do it in Affinity as well.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.