Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Denise in all her glory
Dec 4, 2018 06:45:57 #
Taken in 2009
Denise is the mother of ten yr. old twin girls.
I have been trying to no avail to locate her to see if she is still modeling.
Denise is the mother of ten yr. old twin girls.
I have been trying to no avail to locate her to see if she is still modeling.
Dec 4, 2018 08:22:18 #
Dec 4, 2018 09:01:14 #
Manglesphoto wrote:
Taken in 2009
Denise is the mother of ten yr. old twin girls.
I have been trying to no avail to locate her to see if she is still modeling.
Denise is the mother of ten yr. old twin girls.
I have been trying to no avail to locate her to see if she is still modeling.
When I look at them full-size (not just sized down to fir the screen), on photo #1, all of the grain/noise disappears around her belly button, as if it was blurred out - was there a problem with the shot you were "covering/erasing"?
#2 is my favorite, the lighting and shadows do a great job of making her rear end the natural focal point of the shot.
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Dec 4, 2018 14:37:04 #
olBadger wrote:
When I look at them full-size (not just sized down to fir the screen), on photo #1, all of the grain/noise disappears around her belly button, as if it was blurred out - was there a problem with the shot you were "covering/erasing"?
#2 is my favorite, the lighting and shadows do a great job of making her rear end the natural focal point of the shot.
#2 is my favorite, the lighting and shadows do a great job of making her rear end the natural focal point of the shot.
Its been awhile since I edited these,and I may have tried to diminish some very scaring from carrying the twins, never noticed the bad job before.
Last time this image will hit the screen. Thank you very much.
Frank
Dec 5, 2018 05:20:38 #
Great set, nice to see some B&Ws here. I love the classic, 1920’s pinup look of #3. Thanks for sharing them.
Dec 5, 2018 05:25:03 #
joehel2 wrote:
Great set, nice to see some B&Ws here. I love the classic, 1920’s pinup look of #3. Thanks for sharing them.
Thank you very much Joe
and your welcome
Dec 5, 2018 06:57:10 #
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Dec 5, 2018 06:58:40 #
BboH wrote:
Do like the your lighting and her poses -
Thank you very much Bbo
Dec 5, 2018 07:05:55 #
olBadger wrote:
When I look at them full-size (not just sized down to fir the screen), on photo #1, all of the grain/noise disappears around her belly button, as if it was blurred out - was there a problem with the shot you were "covering/erasing"?
Mother of twins, so I'm guessing stretch marks (which you can see a bit by the lower edge of the blur)
Dec 5, 2018 08:27:32 #
RogStrix
Loc: UK
Manglesphoto wrote:
Its been awhile since I edited these,and I may have tried to diminish some very scaring from carrying the twins, never noticed the bad job before.
Last time this image will hit the screen. Thank you very much.
Frank
Last time this image will hit the screen. Thank you very much.
Frank
Perhaps instead of hiding this you might consider digging out the original, re-scanning/re-editing it or posting for us to have a go?
Its too good a shot to junk.
Dec 5, 2018 09:16:00 #
RogStrix wrote:
Perhaps instead of hiding this you might consider digging out the original, re-scanning/re-editing it or posting for us to have a go?
Its too good a shot to junk.
Its too good a shot to junk.
Or leave them in. They are part of her story.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Dec 5, 2018 09:19:54 #
RogStrix
Loc: UK
Funnily enough it's the 'noise' generated that's irks me rather then any body marks, they aren't offensive to my eyes.
Rab-Eye wrote:
Or leave them in. They are part of her story.
Dec 5, 2018 09:38:54 #
RogStrix wrote:
Perhaps instead of hiding this you might consider digging out the original, re-scanning/re-editing it or posting for us to have a go?
Its too good a shot to junk.
Its too good a shot to junk.
I agree completely, and I certainly don't think stretch marks (if that was the case) should be left out, let her beauty show as it is. :-)
Dec 5, 2018 12:00:50 #
Dec 5, 2018 16:45:18 #
RogStrix wrote:
Perhaps instead of hiding this you might consider digging out the original, re-scanning/re-editing it or posting for us to have a go?
Its too good a shot to junk.
Its too good a shot to junk.
Thank you very much for your suggestions.
At this time I am in the middle of a move, I'M luck if I can find the toilet paper. Those file are on a CD and my CD catalog is on a HD that is packed and probably at the new place, once I get settled in I may redo the image and post again.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.