Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
XT-3 and Lightroom
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 6, 2018 15:58:56   #
al13
 
I haven't purchased the XT-3 yet. I have one on hold at our local camera store and will have to make a decision by Thursday. Trying to trade my D-500 and two lens. Had another surgery on my right hand and need a lighter camera now. I do love my D-500.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 16:02:22   #
al13
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Right! Whatever you buy, you will have a way to process raw files. I would never put off buying a camera because the program I'm using can't process the files. There is always a way.


I have always processed raw now but had read comments that LR didn't do a great job with the X Fuji's Raw. I guess LR fixed it.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 23:27:25   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Right! Whatever you buy, you will have a way to process raw files. I would never put off buying a camera because the program I'm using can't process the files. There is always a way.


SilkyPix came with my Lumix GH4. For difficult subjects, I prefer it to Lightroom, because Panasonic shared their color science with SilkyPix’s developers — not Adobe. Adobe has to reverse engineer everything.

Reply
 
 
Nov 7, 2018 06:18:46   #
ejrmaine Loc: South Carolina
 
al13 wrote:
I am contemplating putchasing the XT-3 and have questions concerning Lightroom’s ability to properly support it. Has anyone encountered problems with the XT-3 and LR Classic? I’m not sure I'd be willing to purchase a new program to support a new camera. Thanks in advance for help with this.


I have the new Fuji X-T3 and use Lightroom Classic CC on a Mojave Mac and everything works fine.

Reply
Nov 7, 2018 07:40:01   #
AndyGarcia
 
al13 wrote:
just saw it. I hate to add an additional step. Does it convert the raw to something else?


Iridient developer is by far the best App for Xtrans files. LR has always struggled with Xtrans files, IMHO, which is why I don't use it anymore.

I would respectfully suggest you try Iridient, on a free trial, also ON1 & Alien Skin X4.

Reply
Nov 7, 2018 07:47:24   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
Gene51 wrote:
Most raw converters do not play well with Xtrans sensors - except for SilkyPix. The other guys are working hard to fully support these cameras, but they aren't quite ready for prime time. LR 2019 still isn't there yet. Capture One is pretty good, but also not there yet.


In your opinion, does Iridient X-Transformer do a good job? I tried the free Capture One, but it doesn't export DNG which I would want to use with Lightroom and I'm not about to master the complexities of Capture One Pro; I've got enough on my hands with Lightroom and Photoshop.

Reply
Nov 7, 2018 08:31:09   #
magpix Loc: St. Michaels, MD
 
I have the XT-3, and the latest version of LR Classic will convert Fuji's RAW files without any problem. However, I am trying out Capture One because it now has a free version for Fuji files, "Capture One Express for Fuji." It has about 70% of the features that its "Pro" version has. Although I really don't feel like spending time to learn a new program, I have found that it does a better job on certain files....better sharpening, color and noise reduction. And since I sell large prints at fine art exhibitions, it may be worth it to me to make the switch. Still not decided. But if you are not a "pixel peeper" and don't print extra large prints, LR Classic does a very decent job. Another approach is to use Iridient Transformer as a LR plug-in to convert Fuji files to DNG and then use LR for processing and cataloging. It's seamless, very inexpensive and it does a better job on certain Fuji files than LR. These are not my opinions....I use these programs every day. BTW, enjoy your XT-3. It's a fantastic camera, and its vastly improved focusing system is well worth the upgrade from the XT-2.

Reply
 
 
Nov 7, 2018 08:34:39   #
al13
 
Thanks

Reply
Nov 7, 2018 08:36:11   #
magpix Loc: St. Michaels, MD
 
If you are still not sure about trading in your D500 for the XT-3, check out this DP Review video. It compares the D500, XT-3 and a Panasonic and Olympus system. The XT-3 is the clear winner. https://www.dpreview.com/videos/4312537526/dpreview-tv-crop-sensor-pro-body-cameras?ref_=pe_1674010_132618830

Reply
Nov 7, 2018 09:38:32   #
OKPhotog Loc: Oklahoma
 
I come from a Canon RAW background and began using Lightroom with Version 2 and have continued through version 6, now using Lightroom Classic. I bought a Fuji XT-2 about a year ago and now also have an XT-3. Originally I was disappointed in Adobe’s processing of Fuji RAF (Fuji RAW) files, but Adobe has definitely made progress with the RAF conversion. My advice would be keep your sharpening sliders low in general and sharpen in the areas of the image that actually require it rather than sharpening overall. It is easy to over sharpen RAF files and end up with a “wormy” effect in some images, mostly landscapes with distant foliage. That’s just my experience. Others may have seen it in other types of images. I do think Adobe over sharpens as a default, so you may want to set up a preset to use on import that sets lower sharpening amounts.

Capture One has a free dedicated Fuji conversion program. I’ve played with it and found it to work well, but in a recent (last week) comparison of a landscape file with the type of image that has presented problems in the past, I found no significant difference between the images produced by the two programs. I’m knowledgeable, but not expert, so this is just my experience.

BTW....I absolutely love my Fuji cameras and lenses! They are a pleasure to work with! I still have my full frame Canon and still use it for certain types of work, but my Fujis are more fun!

Reply
Nov 7, 2018 11:32:18   #
Fredrick Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
 
rjaywallace wrote:
What sort of problems are you worried about other than whether Lightroom supports it? What bad experiences have you personally had previously that is making you skittish? The biggest issue with the X-T3 is its lack of 5-axis in-body stabilization.


Most of the heavier Fuji lenses you would put on the X-T3 have OIS up to 5 stops ... non issue.

For $1,500, you won’t find a better digital camera (DSLR or mirrorless) on the market today.

Reply
 
 
Nov 7, 2018 12:08:58   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
burkphoto wrote:
SilkyPix came with my Lumix GH4. For difficult subjects, I prefer it to Lightroom, because Panasonic shared their color science with SilkyPix’s developers — not Adobe. Adobe has to reverse engineer everything.


Maybe I should find you and sign up for classes. I got SilkyPix with my GX7 and GX8. I ignored it thinking it was more like SillyPicks. I'll do some rethinking.

Reply
Nov 7, 2018 16:07:25   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
bsprague wrote:
Maybe I should find you and sign up for classes. I got SilkyPix with my GX7 and GX8. I ignored it thinking it was more like SillyPicks. I'll do some rethinking.


Once you mess with it for a few hours straight, it makes sense. Read the JEnglish manual if you can. It helps.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.