Vee
Loc: Mountain View, CA
First off, I love mustang's, when I saw this one at the car show, I just had to try and shoot a picture of it. I have included the stats, and the engine. I really don't know how to shoot an engine, but, I did my best.
nice pic's, and really nice car
Vee wrote:
First off, I love mustang's, when I saw this one at the car show, I just had to try and shoot a picture of it. I have included the stats, and the engine. I really don't know how to shoot an engine, but, I did my best.
Nice pics.........Might I suggest when You shoot an engine, you shoot it from the front...sometimes it makes for a more interesting shot. Not always true...it depends on the engine.
Vee
Loc: Mountain View, CA
photophly wrote:
Vee wrote:
First off, I love mustang's, when I saw this one at the car show, I just had to try and shoot a picture of it. I have included the stats, and the engine. I really don't know how to shoot an engine, but, I did my best.
Nice pics.........Might I suggest when You shoot an engine, you shoot it from the front...sometimes it makes for a more interesting shot. Not always true...it depends on the engine.
Thanks, I see what you mean.
Vee wrote:
First off, I love mustang's, when I saw this one at the car show, I just had to try and shoot a picture of it. I have included the stats, and the engine. I really don't know how to shoot an engine, but, I did my best.
about time you got back in here, haha, you did good :thumbup:
I remember when I was first smitten by the Mustang. It was 1967 and I was 10 years old. Our neighbor had a brand new GTCS. The 67 is still one of my favorites.
i want one!
on second though, no, i'd probably get into WAY too much trouble with one of those...
photophly wrote:
Vee wrote:
First off, I love mustang's, when I saw this one at the car show, I just had to try and shoot a picture of it. I have included the stats, and the engine. I really don't know how to shoot an engine, but, I did my best.
Nice pics.........Might I suggest when You shoot an engine, you shoot it from the front...sometimes it makes for a more interesting shot. Not always true...it depends on the engine.
looks like there was some pretty heavy-duty cross-bracing going on in there! that was a fairly common mod on the older muscle cars to help keep the body from flexing and improve cornering. most of the old Mopar "A" bodies needed it desperately!
SQUIRL033 wrote:
photophly wrote:
Vee wrote:
First off, I love mustang's, when I saw this one at the car show, I just had to try and shoot a picture of it. I have included the stats, and the engine. I really don't know how to shoot an engine, but, I did my best.
Nice pics.........Might I suggest when You shoot an engine, you shoot it from the front...sometimes it makes for a more interesting shot. Not always true...it depends on the engine.
looks like there was some pretty heavy-duty cross-bracing going on in there! that was a fairly common mod on the older muscle cars to help keep the body from flexing and improve cornering. most of the old Mopar "A" bodies needed it desperately!
quote=photophly quote=Vee First off, I love must... (
show quote)
Some of the Older Chevies needed it too...if You added enoung power......and we all love that power.
Vee
Loc: Mountain View, CA
jkm757 wrote:
I remember when I was first smitten by the Mustang. It was 1967 and I was 10 years old. Our neighbor had a brand new GTCS. The 67 is still one of my favorites.
I had a turbo charged mustang. I had to have the turbo replaced twice. I loved that car. :lol:
Vee
Loc: Mountain View, CA
SQUIRL033 wrote:
i want one!
on second though, no, i'd probably get into WAY too much trouble with one of those...
I'd love to have the 2010. :P
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.