Perspective is changed with different lenses (Page 22): Artbob you have been shown proof that you are wrong many, many times. Your response always boils down to a decidedly...

Rose42

Artbob you have been shown proof that you are wrong many, many times. Your response always boils down to a decidedly un-scientific "nuh-uh". There are numerous external sources to back that up. Now you are using someone else's photo when it was clear he didn't want that and you refuse his request to take it down.

This thread is getting progressively uglier sir.

artBob Loc: Near Chicago

Apaflo wrote:

So you are intentionally playing word games by confusing different meanings of a common word.

Tsck tsck. That is unacceptably rude behavior! The point is to communicate, not to confuse.

Well thank you for trying to straighten out the world. Bit o' news, "perspective" has many meanings. Fact, some photographers have taken a PART of human understanding of visual perspective (overlap) and made it the only way they understand. I hope this clears up the confusion you are suffering.

Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska

artBob wrote:

Well thank you for trying to straighten out the world. Bit o' news, "perspective" has many meanings. Fact, some photographers have taken a PART of human understanding of visual perspective (overlap) and made it the only way they understand. I hope this clears up the confusion you are suffering.

That describes the symantics game you have been engaged in very well.

artBob Loc: Near Chicago

Rose42 wrote:

Artbob you have been shown proof that you are wrong many, many times. Your response always boils down to a decidedly un-scientific "nuh-uh". There are numerous external sources to back that up. Now you are using someone else's photo when it was clear he didn't want that and you refuse his request to take it down.

This thread is getting progressively uglier sir.

You misinterpret, sir. Most certainly I abhor ugliness. Also, it might be to thine advantage to note that a gentleman never insults--unintentionally.
Methinks thou mightest add some posts of beauty, if thou caress so much.

Angmo

Well I choose the mathematics of optical physics and actual experience over brainless rants of trolling.

But that’s me. I prefer facts and truth. YMMV

chaman

You, the OP, actually were a teacher.....my God. Im at a loss of words. Someone said you were a smart man and a terrific photographer. Ive said it before and will say it again... No you are not either..... This thread shows it very clearly. On and feel free to put me in your ignore list......

tdekany Loc: Oregon

Silverman wrote:

Guess What, this whole argument on UHH is quite rediculous to be honest.
I am a "Newbie" and all of you are "Talking into the Wind". I just want to learn and enjoy Photography, NOT read juvenile arguments that are not helping anyone. So please quit now

Hey Silver, if you don’t like the content, you have the right to move on. No one is forcing you to click on this thread.

artBob Loc: Near Chicago

chaman wrote:

You, the OP, actually were a teacher.....my God. Im at a loss of words. Someone said you were a smart man and a terrific photographer. Ive said it before and will say it again... No you are not either..... This thread shows it very clearly. On and feel free to put me in your ignore list......

Kinda wondering what you get out out of this. I hope you didn't lose too many words, in case you ever have to explain yourself.