Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Panasonic FZ1000 Vs. Sony Cyber Shot RX 10
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Apr 14, 2015 07:12:01   #
Puffing Billy
 
xiphios wrote:
Because my Canon Mark IIIds with the 70-200 lens was too heavy for an old codger to carry especially when traveling, I finally purchased the Panasonic FX1000 after lengthy consideration of reviews.
Big Mistake.
Certainly the optic qualities do not compare with the above Canon equipment. Far from it! However, with the use of post-processing some of sharpness and detail qualities may be improved. However, the deficiencies of the physical aspects of this Panasonic camera stand out. Certainly the plastic rather than metal body may be considered less adequate, but the price indicates such. However, the shutter ceased to work properly (focus erratic to non-existant, focus button non-fuctional, to say the least, plus the zoom frequently locking up mid shoot!). The Panasonic customer support was nil because they had to look up every problem or question. Finally a supervisor took over and had me send the camera back for "repair", last week. After less the 5 months of practically no use (less than 1500 shots.)!
After using cameras for more than 70 years, this is my FIRST camera ever requiring repair! Quality is the problem. I now feel that I will purchase cameras ONLY from camera companies, not electronic firms who specialize in circuitry (often problematic!) and NOT in camera construction! Canon and Nikon for me, with no ensuant fundamental problems.
Just THINK before you LEAP!
Because my Canon Mark IIIds with the 70-200 lens w... (show quote)


I am sorry you had so much trouble.
I also have the FZ1000, and have taken maybe 3000 photos. In that time it has performed flawlessly. Focusing is fast and totally accurate. Low light focusing is very very good. I have had a succession of high end Canon and Panasonic cameras, and find this is a good option in many ways. It is pleasant and easy to use, and the IQ is excellent. I am really pleased with this camera, and given the choice would buy it again. The prints at a4 size are indistinguishable from my present full frame camera, except under very special and unusual circumstances. All in all it is a good product. Incidentally I have had a high end Canon which required repair just after the warranty ran out. It cost $450. That was a disappointment.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 17:33:32   #
seagull5
 
I do own the RX10m4 and after 4 months I have not had a better camera. People say its pricey ...I just look at what comes in that camera and just wonder what a 24 to 600 lens on an A9 body would cost. Seems to do everything I want and seems to do it well. Happy camper here

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 19:17:53   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
PMMPHOTOGRAPHY wrote:
I intend to purchase a "bridge" camera for an overseas vacation in the next few weeks.

I have "narrowed" down to two cameras and would be most appreciative of any knowledge, opinion etc.

One question that I have and have a difficult time getting my head around is how good at 400 mm could the Panasonic be with a 1" sensor?

Thank you for any info, critique etc


I don't have any images from the FZ1000, but you can look at my RX10M4 stuff here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157696606493264
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157667029395028
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157689083645890
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157694805547345
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157665487054018
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157693140571925
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157665486900208
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157690214837382

I have used the camera extensively since getting it in December, and so far it has met or exceeded my expectations.

I typically use a Nikon D800 or D810 with a full complement of lenses from 14mm to 600mmF4. I have no reservations at all recommending the Sony.

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Aug 1, 2018 11:04:32   #
seagull5
 
without reading the whole post. I have owned a FZ1000 and a RX10M4....Both are a pleasure to use and the results are can be awesome. My preference is the RX10M4. Have had more keepers and for a bird shot I have had absolutely nothing better. Love the phots stopped in mid flight. This is just my opinion for whatever it means

Reply
Aug 10, 2018 19:57:25   #
seagull5
 
seagull5 wrote:
without reading the whole post. I have owned a FZ1000 and a RX10M4....Both are a pleasure to use and the results are can be awesome. My preference is the RX10M4. Have had more keepers and for a bird shot I have had absolutely nothing better. Love the phots stopped in mid flight. This is just my opinion for whatever it means
. Anyways these are from the past week or two. You would have a winner in both cameras ….these are from the RX and I hope it shows what you can do with great glass...I actually bought a second RX10M4 but sent it back...


(Download)




(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.