SusanFromVermont wrote:
If you read the OP's posts, you would know that RRS does make an L-bracket for that camera - OP just overlooked it and found it later! And I suspect you are over-simplifying what goes into making the L-plates [and other custom gear]. Perhaps the materials are not very expensive, although RRS doesn't use cheap materials. But consider the research to come up with that custom design for each camera, the testing to make sure they have it right, and then the precision milling to have everything fit together the way it should. All of that costs money. AND each item can become outdated very quickly when people replace cameras on a regular basis. Technology just keeps on moving. There is a limited time frame for making the profit required for producing truly custom and high quality L-brackets, plates, etc. Also, if someone didn't do the work, what would people who think like you do use to make a copy?
If you read the OP's posts, you would know that RR... (
show quote)
My point on cropping was that the OP mentioned he has not used an L plate, but rather cropping to get verticals out of landscape mode. From his statement, a smart person can suppose that he is cropping pixels out of his images to create what normally should have been shot vertically. It's not a big leap, for a smart person to then understand that he is losing pixels that could have created a more high resolution. I don't see how anyone could have misinterpreted my intent in my statement. But please note I was writing for the people who could understand my meaning.
We all think differently, and some not at all.
My point on the RRS tools. Great company. And it's not as if they are the only company figuring out solutions for these issues. However, many of us choose NOT to be their market. First, I don't think everybody necessarily has the money to pay what they ask for their solutions. Secondly, if their merchandise were protected by patent, and they enforced those patent rights, more power to them. I do not however choose to pay their prices, both by means and my own judgement. There are companies selling copies, probably just as well made and durable, for less money. If RRS has any right to close down such interlopers, let them do so, instead of overpricing their product.
I choose not to pay their prices, and I get my problems solved. Yes, it's a cruel world, and as good as RRS may be, they take advantage of those who pay high retail. I presume they still make a profit and can do so from those who are "conspicuous consumers"!
Conspicuous use of brand names means nothing to me if the end goal is simply a means to derive higher profits than justifiable, from the consumer market. RRS, as many photography companies simply overprices, while they could, but won't, provide reasonably priced solutions for the buyers.
It's really the fault of overpaying buyers who have no idea about proper solution pricing, but simply must have the "brand" be so totally obvious. I have no reservation in my thinking on this. People who think like you do, simply cost us all more than we need to pay, unless we are resourceful and thrifty in our spending.