Time Magazine (Page 2): This was the democrat reality that they screamed about. The truth is the lying fake media took this picture of the child because she was cute, twisted it into...

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Wellhiem wrote:

"Fake news" followed by a link to The Daily Mail. Was the link meant as an example of fake news, or is this the most ironic post ever?

This was the democrat reality that they screamed about. The truth is the lying fake media took this picture of the child because she was cute, twisted it into crap like they always do to create something to scream about. In truth, the child was never separated from the mother, this according to the father.

But, but, Clinton News Network and Rachel Madcow ONLY report truth, right? I saw Madcow have to leave the show because she was sobbing for the illegals. It was pretty funny.

SteveS Loc: The US is my home.

Elaine2025 wrote:

This was the democrat reality that they screamed about. The truth is the lying fake media took this picture of the child because she was cute, twisted it into crap like they always do to create something to scream about. In truth, the child was never separated from the mother, this according to the father.

But, but, Clinton News Network and Rachel Madcow ONLY report truth, right? I saw Madcow have to leave the show because she was sobbing for the illegals. It was pretty funny.

Wellhiem Loc: Sunny England.

Elaine2025 wrote:

This was the democrat reality that they screamed about. The truth is the lying fake media took this picture of the child because she was cute, twisted it into crap like they always do to create something to scream about. In truth, the child was never separated from the mother, this according to the father.

But, but, Clinton News Network and Rachel Madcow ONLY report truth, right? I saw Madcow have to leave the show because she was sobbing for the illegals. It was pretty funny.

Where on that cover does it claim that the child was separated from the mother? The photo was taken at the border. If you do a bit of research, you'll also find that Trump wasn't actually there at the time and it didn't take place in front of a red backdrop.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Wellhiem wrote:

Where on that cover does it claim that the child was separated from the mother? The photo was taken at the border. If you do a bit of research, you'll also find that Trump wasn't actually there at the time and it didn't take place in front of a red backdrop.

You are correct. I am speaking of the way the media capitalized on it. I watched CNN say the child was separated from its mother etc. the father came forward and said the child had never been separated from its mother. It was fake news that was a photo op. Other pics were taken with the mother holding the child, but those were not used. The pic is entirely falsified to support a narrative.