Not only am I curious, I am curious as to what policies you think he should have followed.
john vance wrote:
This is really stupid if something is wrong with his tax returns the IRS would have nailed him long ago and every one would know all about it.
Get real people, this is a smoke screen, anything to take spotlight off Obuma, the liar in chief!!!
How do you claim a $77,000 deduction for a horse? We've all heard how his wife uses it as therapy for her MS, but how do you claim it as a business expense, as he did?
I want to know how he got his IRA to be as big as it now is.
I want to know why he hid money in an offshore account that was set up specifically for
foreigners to invest in the U.S.
And please, do you think the IRS has ever actually looked at his return? Republicans have gutted funding for IRS enforcement, just so 500-page returns like Romney's don't get scrutinized. The IRS budget was cut 2.5%, but the enforcement division was cut 3.5%. (Reuters March 2012). Better to look at the 7- or 8-page returns of the average Joe than to actually go after the major cheats.
Give me a break!!! this is not worth a reply
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. His own party wants him to show his returns.
He gives the impression that he is hiding something.
Until they are released there will be no national debate the entire news media will focus on only this question.
He will make a statement and the first question from any reporter will be why won't you release your tax returns.
We the people deserve better than this.
The question remains:
Mitt what are you hiding?
Legally, he's only required to release 2 year's worth of returns. This whole hullabaloo is simply to find fodder to demonize him with & to deflect attention off of Obama
ole sarg wrote:
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. His own party wants him to show his returns.
He gives the impression that he is hiding something.
Until they are released there will be no national debate the entire news media will focus on only this question.
He will make a statement and the first question from any reporter will be why won't you release your tax returns.
We the people deserve better than this.
The question remains:
Mitt what are you hiding?
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. ... (
show quote)
Right on Scott, finnally someone with insight
Screamin Scott wrote:
Legally, he's only required to release 2 year's worth of returns. This whole hullabaloo is simply to find fodder to demonize him with & to deflect attention off of Obama
ole sarg wrote:
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. His own party wants him to show his returns.
He gives the impression that he is hiding something.
Until they are released there will be no national debate the entire news media will focus on only this question.
He will make a statement and the first question from any reporter will be why won't you release your tax returns.
We the people deserve better than this.
The question remains:
Mitt what are you hiding?
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. ... (
show quote)
Legally, he's only required to release 2 year's wo... (
show quote)
It's just funny sometimes to think that his father more or less started the practice of releasing many years of tax returns to the public for scrutiny and yet, his son, for some reason, won't come clean. Either he and his people want the American public to keep dwelling on the issue of his non-complying as his father did and he is hiding something, OR, it takes the presidential early debates on real issues off the table.
Maybe tonight on the national tv interview(s) he will put a stop to all this nonsense and we can get back to a real discussion of which of these monkeys is really qualified to win the election.
John and Scott trying to talk sense to someone who doesnt want or won't look at the facts is waste of time, better to work on our photos than try to continue this discussion!
That's funny, I didn't know George was running for office. I thought he was dead. Just because his father did has no bearing here. If your father committed suicide, would you. Rather extreme example but it's just to say it' s ridiculous to expect him to act just as his father did ( George lost out in his bid for the nomination,not that it matters)
tkhphotography wrote:
Screamin Scott wrote:
Legally, he's only required to release 2 year's worth of returns. This whole hullabaloo is simply to find fodder to demonize him with & to deflect attention off of Obama
ole sarg wrote:
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. His own party wants him to show his returns.
He gives the impression that he is hiding something.
Until they are released there will be no national debate the entire news media will focus on only this question.
He will make a statement and the first question from any reporter will be why won't you release your tax returns.
We the people deserve better than this.
The question remains:
Mitt what are you hiding?
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. ... (
show quote)
Legally, he's only required to release 2 year's wo... (
show quote)
It's just funny sometimes to think that his father more or less started the practice of releasing many years of tax returns to the public for scrutiny and yet, his son, for some reason, won't come clean. Either he and his people want the American public to keep dwelling on the issue of his non-complying as his father did and he is hiding something, OR, it takes the presidential early debates on real issues off the table.
Maybe tonight on the national tv interview(s) he will put a stop to all this nonsense and we can get back to a real discussion of which of these monkeys is really qualified to win the election.
quote=Screamin Scott Legally, he's only required ... (
show quote)
Ive had enough of this garbage I'm out of here back to Photo's as suggested Darn good idea
john vance wrote:
Well Micro he was rich after inheritance from father but gave it away to make his own fortune.
now I don't agree with everything he espouses but he sure as He-- is far better than Obumer
If we re-elect this createn we will not recognize this country after he is through. Like he told Putin after I get re-elected I can do things for you. that alone is treason !!!
not to mention all the other things he has done that is illegal and should go to jail for.but that will never happen no one has the guts to go after him.!!!
Well Micro he was rich after inheritance from fath... (
show quote)
Please mention one thing "he has done that is illegal and should go to jail for." One thing. Nothing he said to Putin as illegal or treason.
To me, treason is doing something like starting a war under false pretenses. . . Let's see, who did that?
ole sarg wrote:
In what way has Obama been a poor President? I am curious.
Ole Sarg, can't you recall when as a child some adult used the explanation "well, you know." Same here, the reasons O'b is a poor president will be reveled along with 10 additional Romney tax returns (perhaps filed in Russia or China rather than the USA) along with the yet to be reveled secrete of Fatima. BE PATIENT!
We, who favor O'b have specific +- lists of reasons. I can not understand how these so called, so claimed to be "Christians" can turn their backs on the previously un-insurable, want a raped 14 year old to have a rapist child, deny birth control to the poorest who can ill afford more children, eliminate womans health care monies,,,, need I go on.... no i think not.
Earlier JFK and FDR were mentioned as rich and thus equated to MWR (Romney) .... it is not the money or how it was earned or not earned, it is the "something is wrong with you or you too would be rich" attitude and the if people lose their job when a company is taken over by his investment company .. so what, thats life... theirs. The English felt that the Irish should starve during the potato famine, H. Hoover during the depression,,, and that French nutritionist who said "let them eat cake."
Those are my reasons as an Independent who has voted Republican before that I will vote for O'b.
Let's see, that would have been the Democratically controlled Congress back in 2002 with the Iraq War Resolution
Kalskag2 wrote:
john vance wrote:
Well Micro he was rich after inheritance from father but gave it away to make his own fortune.
now I don't agree with everything he espouses but he sure as He-- is far better than Obumer
If we re-elect this createn we will not recognize this country after he is through. Like he told Putin after I get re-elected I can do things for you. that alone is treason !!!
not to mention all the other things he has done that is illegal and should go to jail for.but that will never happen no one has the guts to go after him.!!!
Well Micro he was rich after inheritance from fath... (
show quote)
Please mention one thing "he has done that is illegal and should go to jail for." One thing. Nothing he said to Putin as illegal or treason.
To me, treason is doing something like starting a war under false pretenses. . . Let's see, who did that?
quote=john vance Well Micro he was rich after inh... (
show quote)
Screamin Scott
Yes it was, but then again Gen Powell probably the most honorable man in the country in government at that time presented the case. He too was lied to!
Memories are short
ole sarg wrote:
Memories are short
Sarg, you left of distorted and purposely distorted for profit. Also Sarge, the gov did not present a case, it was a crock....
Reminder Screamin Scott.... Why did congress OK the war? Yep, they went for the "mushroom cloud" speech and false "facts" vomited by Baby-Bush and NeoCon(men) friends.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.