Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 80-200 / f2.8 D vs. G?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jun 6, 2018 09:41:48   #
JWCoop
 
I use a Nikon 300S with a Nikon 24-70 / f2.8 as my walk-around outfit.

Now have a need for the extra length. Cannot justify (to "Mama") the extra expense of the new versions.

Cropped sensor works great for me, and the 24-70 is substantially better than what I originally bought with the 300S.

The D versions are available substantially less than Gs.

Here are the questions for those who have used both: (1) what is the actual difference between the two? (2) can I expect the image quality of either of these two to be comparable to the 24-70?

No need to comment on FF vs. Cropped. I am up on that.

I once owned a DX 70-300 which was "okay." Gave it away to our daughter.

What do you think?

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 09:45:12   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
80-200 being the old focal length as opposed to the new Nikon 70-200 now?

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 09:47:58   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
I think he needs to look at "D" version vs "G". The D works for many.

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Jun 6, 2018 10:07:41   #
JWCoop
 
80-200 D vs. 70-200 G. Both f2.8.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 10:14:08   #
Kuzano
 
This was just covered in a similar post today.

Ken Rockwell covers both quite well in that post, and he explains G as gelded (no physical aperture ring on the lens-in my book a problem for perceived control issues). But, as a rule G lenses do not Manual Focus.

One review, the G:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200g.htm

the other:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200af.htm

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 10:21:04   #
JWCoop
 
Thanks, but not the lens. Looking at the 2.8.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 10:27:55   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Kuzano wrote:
This was just covered in a similar post today.

Ken Rockwell covers both quite well in that post, and he explains G as gelded (no physical aperture ring on the lens-in my book a problem for perceived control issues). But, as a rule G lenses do not Manual Focus.

One review, the G:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200g.htm

the other:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200af.htm

The op is asking about the 80-200 2.8 lenses.
I had the second version, the AF with a push-pull zoom.
While it was incredibly sharp, I’d go with a newer model with separate zoom/focus rings.
I used mine on the D200 and 300.
The earlier models can be had for a relatively low price, but they have no VR and focus a bit slower than the newer, 70-200 models.
If you’re shooting daytime sports, the VR isn’t much help, but I really make use of the VR at some events I shoot.


https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jun 6, 2018 10:45:16   #
JWCoop
 
That is extremely helpful. Thanks!

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 11:27:37   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
JWCoop wrote:
That is extremely helpful. Thanks!


Several for sale on the Fred Miranda website.
Great place to buy and sell used
Example here for $495
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1545429/0?keyword=Nikon,80-200#14474183
Easy to sign up as a member to contact seller.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 11:42:22   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
JWCoop wrote:
I use a Nikon 300S with a Nikon 24-70 / f2.8 as my walk-around outfit.
Now have a need for the extra length. Cannot justify (to "Mama") the extra expense of the new versions.
Cropped sensor works great for me, and the 24-70 is substantially better than what I originally bought with the 300S.
The D versions are available substantially less than Gs.
Here are the questions for those who have used both: (1) what is the actual difference between the two? (2) can I expect the image quality of either of these two to be comparable to the 24-70?
I use a Nikon 300S with a Nikon 24-70 / f2.8 as my... (show quote)

I can find no reference to an 80~200 G lens. And which of the four 80~200 D versions are you talking about?

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 17:03:33   #
JWCoop
 
70-200 G. Whichever is the preferred D lenses which are 80-200.

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2018 19:23:25   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
JWCoop wrote:
Whichever is the preferred D lenses which are 80-200.

With 5 ED elements (vs. 3 for the others), the Nikon ED AF-S 80~200mm 1:2.8 D produces the best image quality. Plus, the built-in focus motor is faster and quieter.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 19:55:25   #
JWCoop
 
Thanks!

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 21:29:28   #
brucewells Loc: Central Kentucky
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The op is asking about the 80-200 2.8 lenses.
I had the second version, the AF with a push-pull zoom.
While it was incredibly sharp, I’d go with a newer model with separate zoom/focus rings.
I used mine on the D200 and 300.
The earlier models can be had for a relatively low price, but they have no VR and focus a bit slower than the newer, 70-200 models.
If you’re shooting daytime sports, the VR isn’t much help, but I really make use of the VR at some events I shoot.


https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm
The op is asking about the 80-200 2.8 lenses. br I... (show quote)



Reply
Jun 6, 2018 23:39:28   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Kuzano wrote:
This was just covered in a similar post today.

Ken Rockwell covers both quite well in that post, and he explains G as gelded (no physical aperture ring on the lens-in my book a problem for perceived control issues). But, as a rule G lenses do not Manual Focus.

One review, the G:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200g.htm

the other:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200af.htm


Any lens will manually focus. I believe you mean you cannot manually adjust the aperture as there is no aperture ring.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.