MACT wrote:
I just got a polarizing filter (BH) for my Nikon. The last time I used one was 30 years ago and was struck by the intense effects on clouds, visible through the viewfinder. Today, to my surprise, I could see absolutely no effect, no matter the filter rotation. This was true for multiple locations and shooting direction. Is there a reason for this lack of visible effect?
Is it a circular polarizer? They give different results from the ones you rotate.
John N
Loc: HP14 3QF Stokenchurch, UK
Guyserman wrote:
Is it a circular polarizer? They give different results from the ones you rotate.
I believe Circular Polarisers give the same result as Linear Polarisers. Linear Polarisers upset the something on DSLR'S (possibly the Auto Focus) so they require a Circular Polariser.
And both have to be rotated to get the maximum effect.
Thanks for all the replies, unfortunately most don't apply. I was shooting on Manual, it was late afternoon, the sky was clear blue with ~30% puffy cumulus clouds and, as I mentioned, I shot in every direction. It appears the suggestion that the camera display is being adjusted may be the answer. I can see the effect of reducing glare off water, but not of contrasting cloud/sky. So far the only solution I have is to check each shot immediately, then turn the ring, take another shot and check again, until I get the shot I want. Not very convenient, far less so than 30 years ago, but I will have to learn to live with it.
Mike, as a test, take the polarizer off the camera and rotate it while looking through it. You should see the effect on blue sky very pronounced.
90° to Sun... Repeates what has already been said, but I'll add why a polarizer is practically useless on pano's and wide angle lenses... you end up with a band falling somewhere in the photo that is polarized, but the effect is gradually zero at one or both sides as you move from the 90° position... makes for a very awkward effect and most likely a useless image.
I have one- i barely ever use it. When I can, i do like the effect!
kmocabee wrote:
Mike, as a test, take the polarizer off the camera and rotate it while looking through it. You should see the effect on blue sky very pronounced.
Ha! Good point, it works just fine. That suggests that the camera is busily 'optimizing' the view I see and reducing the visible effect.
kmocabee wrote:
Mike, as a test, take the polarizer off the camera and rotate it while looking through it. You should see the effect on blue sky very pronounced.
Make sure you are looking through the filter, the same way that the lens is looking through it. If held in the reverse direction, you will not likely see any Polar' effect.
illininitt wrote:
Pablo: They were going to ban me till they found out I was a Vet (06/68-06/70).
Well, I don't understand that post, in relation to the thread. regarding Polarization in Photography.
Pablo8 wrote:
Well, I don't understand that post, in relation to the thread. regarding Polarization in Photography.
No big deal...he likes to trot out the vet story.
Wonder if he knows that there are many vets here on the forum not looking for sympathy or a pat on the back or trying to impress.
So for maximum effect 90 degrees from the sun tells me that, at high noon the effect should be maximum anywhere near the horizon.
Yes, no, maybe ?
I’m wondering if your memories of 30 years ago were in B&W? The effect is stronger because it had mostly to do with contrast. Also wondering if maybe 30 year old memories were also a factor.
MACT wrote:
I just got a polarizing filter (BH) for my Nikon. The last time I used one was 30 years ago and was struck by the intense effects on clouds, visible through the viewfinder. Today, to my surprise, I could see absolutely no effect, no matter the filter rotation. This was true for multiple locations and shooting direction. Is there a reason for this lack of visible effect?
Did you meanB&W polarizer? If so a thing that I haven't read mentioned is the different performance between brands and models, at least that I've experienced. I have some old Nikon brand ones who's effects are more pronounced than B&W & a few assorted others. The one B&W pro I have is the most subtle of all of them. Notwithstanding the sun angle business, from my experience this could be a piece of the puzzle. I tend to carry a couple so I can choose which to use in a given situation. Good luck sorting it out.
"Basic principle: A Polarizing filter darkens a clear sky at 90 degrees to the sun."
This is a correct statement. I just wanted to mention that using evaluative, matrix or multipattern metering IS NOT what the manufacturer of your camera recommends. These filters are dark and those meters easily get confused unless you keep on shooting and adding exposure compensation. Meter with center weighted or spot meter and then you will have an accurate exposure.
I use old polarizer filters and NEVER had an issue.
sun at your side , not behind .
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.