Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Some New Tech stuff
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 5, 2018 06:45:29   #
LarryFitz Loc: Beacon NY
 
I still have some VHS tapes, no Beta.

Reply
May 5, 2018 06:46:35   #
HOHIMER
 
"WHO'S GOING TO CHECK!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
I have the test scheduled for May 6, 3018. I'll send you a copy of my findings if you like.

Reply
May 5, 2018 06:46:42   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Ron Dial wrote:
There are two new tech items that photographers should watch.

1. M Disk is a type of BluRay disk that supposedly will hold 100GB of data and has a durability of 1000 years. The rating is controversial and is under investigation. Only certain BlyRay burners can handle M Disk and are on the market now. M Disks are being marketed by Verbatium and some other manufacturers. Something to keep an eye on.

2. USB 3.1 also called USB C is a new type of USB connector and cable which transmits and receives data at 10GB @ sec. Requires a new connector on a motherboard although there are adapters being made. The cable is so much faster than USB 2 which transmits at 480 MB@ sec. Hard drives and other peripherals are now on the market.
There are two new tech items that photographers sh... (show quote)


M-Disk is hardly new. It's been around since 2009. It can be a lower capacity DVD 4.7 to 25GB, or the BluRay BDXL version which is 100GB. At $6/100GB, the price is comparable to the cost per GB of an internal 4 TB WD Black Drive. But you'd need 40 disks to equal the capacity, give or take for drive overhead after formatting. That means a lot of boxes of disks.

USB 3.1 is not USB-C. There are a few differences. USB-C may transfer the same amount of data, but the connector is reversible, the USB-C port can handle more electrical power if it supports PD. The throughput is 10Gbps or 1.25 GB/s, which is still fast.

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2018 06:47:07   #
Fotoserj Loc: St calixte Qc Ca
 
What do you mean absolute in ten year, they’re absolute the day you buy them

Reply
May 5, 2018 06:54:57   #
Largobob
 
billnikon wrote:
Don't you just love when a product comes out and they say, "data and has a durability of 1000 years". WHO'S GOING TO CHECK!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And like a fool at age 69, I just bought all LED replacement bulbs that claim an average life of 22.5 years.....hoping I'll be around to check. Now, that's wishful thinking! lol

Reply
May 5, 2018 07:01:46   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
HOHIMER wrote:
"WHO'S GOING TO CHECK!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
I have the test scheduled for May 6, 3018. I'll send you a copy of my findings if you like.



Reply
May 5, 2018 07:11:14   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
usb 3.1 gen1=5gps , 3.1 gen2 10gbs I believe. Could be wrong.

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2018 08:58:22   #
vanbr
 
100GB M-Disc has major advantages over most archival backups:
Any rotating media (hard drives) - hard drives fail, some sooner than others.
Flash drives - Flash drives require "refreshing" i.e. re writing, in order to prevent data loss.
The Cloud: companies fail what will they do with your data?

So if your work is irreplaceable, M-Disc is a good possibility especially if you store it off site.

Reply
May 5, 2018 09:22:37   #
chrisg-optical Loc: New York, NY
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
I'm always skeptical about anything that claims a ridiculously long durability like 1000 years. Technology changes so fast that things are obsolete in 10-20 years. Can you buy readers for storage media from 50 years ago outside of an antique store? 8" floppies? 7 track tape? Wire recordings? Claims like that are based on extrapolation of accelerated stress testing. Extreme extrapolation, in my view.

100 GBytes isn't really a large amount of data any more. How large were image file sizes 10 years ago compared to now? How many photos do you take now compared to 10 years ago? Useful storage these days is measured in Terabytes. What will be unit be 10 years from now? Do you really want to sort through 50 disks to find the image you want?

I'm not impressed with M-disk claims.
I'm always skeptical about anything that claims a ... (show quote)


True the only media that's stood the test of time so far is stone/clay tablets (Sumerian 6000+ years) - imagine if they stored all of their accounts on magnetic media? Of current technology LTO tape has longest archive life 30+ years and lowest bit error rate. Flash and spinning hard drives are subject to degradation over time so are short term 10-20+ years, but may also be subject to mechanical/electrical spikes/crashes at any time. Mechanically pressed discs are most durable and will last longest, but are subject to heat damage, not to mention how long will DVD/CD drives continue to be available (probably for a decade or so more) and this is only economical for large/ bulk quantities.

We have to think in terms of "generational" copies made on diverse media...like films of yesteryear now digitized and stored on diverse media everywhere.

Flash cards > hard drive > RAID 1/5/10 > cloud and or tape backup for archive > ??? future

Always multiple copies asap for the content you want to keep.

Reply
May 5, 2018 09:26:53   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Peterff wrote:
Sure, but nobody uses Stonehenge for its original purpose anymore. I'm sure that M-DISCs will endure, but good luck finding a device to read them a few decades from now. The whole idea of digital is that it isn't wedded to a single form factor or device type. My wife and I have plenty of VHS material still, and the mechanism to transfer the content to digital media, but nobody makes VHS players or recorders any more. Once the last ones die, the content is inaccessible. M-DISC will likely follow the same fate.

As Scott McNealy once said: "Technology has the shelf life of a banana!"
Sure, but nobody uses Stonehenge for its original ... (show quote)


Technology GIVES you a rotten banana every few years, too, as manufacturers make each last gen solution obsolete.

Reply
May 5, 2018 09:50:24   #
lsimpkins Loc: SE Pennsylvania
 
tcthome wrote:
usb 3.1 gen1=5gps , 3.1 gen2 10gbs I believe. Could be wrong.

Not wrong, but as in so many of these standards, the theoretical maximum throughput is what is quoted, but seldom achieved.

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2018 10:01:09   #
mckraft
 
M-Disk has been around since 2009. The disks have been costly but the price has been going down. A LG slim external recorder runs about $80. The disks come in 4.7($1.20), 25BDR($4.20) , 50BDR($7.50) & 100BDR ($14.00) GBs. (when bought in bulk). I use the 4.7 for video and the larger ones for bigger videos and RAW images. I am a historian and love the past. I find it satisfying to know these images will be available for hundreds of years in the future. I have faith in technology and believe in the far future, there always will be a way to view these disks. Some people believe the future ends at their death, I don’t.

Reply
May 5, 2018 10:14:49   #
JimKing Loc: Salisbury, Maryland USA
 
As an aside I've recently added a Nikon D850 to my arsenal and I did a quick calculation. If I were still using the most recent popular floppy disks (1.44MB) it would require 38 of those disks to store ONE raw photo from the 850.

Reply
May 5, 2018 10:17:35   #
DHooch
 
I'll be here in a thousand years. I'll let you know.😁

Reply
May 5, 2018 10:30:12   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
billnikon wrote:
Don't you just love when a product comes out and they say, "data and has a durability of 1000 years". WHO'S GOING TO CHECK!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.