Linda it's always a pleasure to see you feedback. it's always concise. easy to understand, and helpful. you make this site a better place. now if I can figure out reply quote I may get better at this posting thing
graphic1 wrote:
Linda it's always a pleasure to see you feedback. it's always concise. easy to understand, and helpful. you make this site a better place. now if I can figure out reply quote I may get better at this posting thing
LOL, "reply" and "quote reply" are directly below every individual posting you see on the screen (also "report issue"
) Thank you much!
#1 in that I can picture being there. If there was a reason I couldn't capture the whole of the scene, I'd rotate the camera and pick out the best I could get from the fragments available. If I had the whole scene, I'd take it and be happy to take it all in. It's what I saw. It captures the splendor of the view.
I liked #3. There's a definite story, that I'd guess we all read differently. It's out there. Shrouded in fog. Looks like a meandering road starting from the left, maybe going there or just going that way.
#2 is too cropped. Parts of this here, parts there. Makes me interested in the picture that's not there.
#1 is "busy". I'd crop #2 off and make that a picture on it's own. Then make another- keep #2 in there and crop a little off the right, and make the foggy distance going towards the light the subject.
I like the first the most, followed by the third.
jeryh
Loc: Oxfordshire UK
I really prefer the third photo; It is a more complete image, in that your eye travels into the scene, and as such you are involved. A lovely shot.
I like the 1st one as well. I do find the 2nd one interesting.
I like both the first and third ones; the second one doesn’t do much for me.
One of the most interesting things regarding Landscape images is that there often hidden images.
I like all 3 of yours.
Don
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.