Main Photography Discussion
In pursuit of sharp glass
Page
<<first
<prev
3 of 3
Apr 9, 2018 17:06:02
#
juanbalv
Loc: Los Angeles / Hawthorne
repleo wrote:
?????
So dropping your high quality, high priced lens on the ground is the way to improve technique and artistic vision. I'll have to try that.
Oh Hell No. I could never afford that!
Reply
Apr 9, 2018 17:07:25
#
juanbalv
Loc: Los Angeles / Hawthorne
Rongnongno wrote:
Please explain this fixation on lenses, prime or not.
This is the third thread created on this with same slant.
You know!
Reply
Apr 9, 2018 18:46:56
#
CatMarley
Loc: North Carolina
Dutzie wrote:
Image quality and $ are in direct proportion, get over it....
This is oft repeated, but I have yet to see proof. As a scientist, I have been taught that repetition is not necessarily data.
Reply
Apr 9, 2018 18:56:06
#
pithydoug
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
CatMarley wrote:
This is oft repeated, but I have yet to see proof. As a scientist, I have been taught that repetition is not necessarily data.
Then to deny our president? :) :)
Reply
Apr 9, 2018 19:08:49
#
DanielB
Loc: San Diego, Ca
I've used both and there is a marked difference in quality of the images. Specially on full frame camera's over 20 megapixels.
Reply
Apr 9, 2018 20:27:41
#
AllenDpics
Loc: Williamsburg Virginia
Rongnongno wrote:
Please explain this fixation on lenses, prime or not.
This is the third thread created on this with same slant.
Here is a suggestion. When the fourth thread is created with the same slant, don’t read it
Reply
Apr 9, 2018 20:37:26
#
broncomaniac
Loc: Lynchburg, VA
traderjohn wrote:
So true. It's like thinking some pontificating ass has something to offer.
I see what you did there.
Reply
Apr 10, 2018 06:14:38
#
chippy65
Loc: Cambridge
Plastic " Diana" camera.........not seen one here in England......Any good ?
Reply
Page
<<first
<prev
3 of 3
If you want to reply, then
register here
. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion