Short survey about 3D anaglyph photo.
Apr 7, 2018 08:42:20 #
Apr 7, 2018 09:28:40 #
Apr 7, 2018 09:32:13 #
MMC wrote:
First of all you should buy or make anaglyph glasses . They are very cheap on eBay and Amazon. Then You can open this site https://www.imgonline.com.ua/eng/stereoscopic-3d-picture-from-photo.php and upload in this site your single picture. Your picture will be converted to 3D for free. This is the simplest way for beginning.
Although you can produce something that looks like 3D from a single image, it takes a lot of knowledge and effort and it's still not likely to look right unless you are very selective in picking out a subject that is very simple.
Take a look at 3D Test. The 3D image in the first post was created from two separate images, a left and right eye view taken a few inches apart.
Now look at the 2D-3D conversion using imgonline done from only the left eye view: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-521797-1.html#8870979 Lines that should be straight are wavy and the bed of juniper is not rendered correctly.
I deliberately picked that subject to illustrate the shortcomings of 2D to 3D conversion.
Apr 7, 2018 09:56:46 #
Thanks for your reply. Without anaglyph glasses you can not see 3D effect of 3D anaglyph picture. Few month ago when I did not have such glasses I have found that I had red and cyan filters for my small flashlight and I tried to use them to see 3D anaglyph photos. I was amazed and googled how can I do such pictures and bought on eBay anaglyph glasses. Now I have new fun.There are different ways to receive 3D effect and some of them are very simple. Do not be afraid.
jaymatt wrote:
1. no
2. no
3. no
4. yes
As a side note, when I see a photo entry tagged as 3-D, I don’t even bother to look.
2. no
3. no
4. yes
As a side note, when I see a photo entry tagged as 3-D, I don’t even bother to look.
Apr 7, 2018 09:57:54 #
Apr 7, 2018 10:04:57 #
Thank you for your reply. I tried to see pictures for cross eyed method but it does not work for me and I am not sure that it would not hurt my weak eyes.
dlmorris wrote:
Yes on 1
Yes on 2
No on 3
Yes on 4.
Though I have taken 3D photos that you had to look at cross eyed to see. Gives you a head ache after looking at a few, but it does work.
Yes on 2
No on 3
Yes on 4.
Though I have taken 3D photos that you had to look at cross eyed to see. Gives you a head ache after looking at a few, but it does work.
Apr 7, 2018 10:38:29 #
aflundi
Loc: Albuquerque, NM
1) yes, 2) yes, 3) no, 4) no.
I said 'no' for 3) because I've never tried making one so I don't know if there are issues I haven't thought of, but it seems almost trivial -- take two pictures side by side, give each a color cast that correlates to the glasses' lens colors, then merge them into one image. Is it harder than that?
I have BTW enjoyed seeing your 3D photo posts. Thanks.
I said 'no' for 3) because I've never tried making one so I don't know if there are issues I haven't thought of, but it seems almost trivial -- take two pictures side by side, give each a color cast that correlates to the glasses' lens colors, then merge them into one image. Is it harder than that?
I have BTW enjoyed seeing your 3D photo posts. Thanks.
Apr 7, 2018 10:44:01 #
1- No
2- No
3- Yes
4- No
--Bob
2- No
3- Yes
4- No
--Bob
MMC wrote:
I do not see many members of this forum interested in looking and creating anuglyph 3D pictures. Please answer my questions using just question's numbers like this: 1 yes, 2 yes, 3 yes, 4 no.
1. Do you have anaglyph glasses ?
2. Have you ever seen anuglyph pictures using anaglyph glasses?
3. Do you know how to make 3D anagliph photo?
4. Do you think it is difficult?
Thank you in advance for participating in this survey.
1. Do you have anaglyph glasses ?
2. Have you ever seen anuglyph pictures using anaglyph glasses?
3. Do you know how to make 3D anagliph photo?
4. Do you think it is difficult?
Thank you in advance for participating in this survey.
Apr 7, 2018 10:51:13 #
Apr 7, 2018 10:54:10 #
Apr 7, 2018 11:22:50 #
Acufine3200
Loc: Texarkana USA
1. No
2. No
3. No
4. No clue
Sounds as if this is another interesting branch on the photography tree—as is infrared; interesting,but not for everyone. Hold your flag high sir, and keep creating interest.
2. No
3. No
4. No clue
Sounds as if this is another interesting branch on the photography tree—as is infrared; interesting,but not for everyone. Hold your flag high sir, and keep creating interest.
Apr 7, 2018 11:27:00 #
Apr 7, 2018 11:29:00 #
aflundi wrote:
... it seems almost trivial -- take two pictures side by side, give each a color cast that correlates to the glasses' lens colors, then merge them into one image. Is it harder than that? ....
The only hard part is getting them equally leveled and aligned when you overlap them so that the image doesn't come out too far from the surface of the display.
The rest of it is, as you say, almost trivial.
Apr 7, 2018 11:32:42 #
Apr 7, 2018 11:41:03 #
3D photo from 2 shots much better but from 1 shot not so bad and acceptable for beginning.
selmslie wrote:
Although you can produce something that looks like... (show quote)
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.