bkyser wrote:
Not that this explains the initial cost, but if you think about it. The tripod I use is from the '60s, with a newer ball head on it. It weighs a ton, and doesn't fold down small, but it works perfectly for me. Because it's outlasted several film cameras, up through 6 digital cameras, and various lenses that quit, or broke, or??? I guess the tripod over a period of time was a better investment than any of the cameras.
I am still quite happy with my Gitzo tripod purchased new in 1990. I guess I'm an old fart; I turned 59 today. Why do we still us them? Not necessarily from senility. While I do share the sentiment, this quote came directly from the Really Right Stuff website:
"Nothing beats mass when it comes to stability".