GoofyNewfie wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
Erv wrote:
I am still using my coffee filter. Santa didn't bring it this year. :) He did get me a good SU800 tho, so the coffee filter will go another year.
Erv
Explanation, please.
You put the coffee filter over the lens, point the camera from the subject to the camera position and do a custom w/b. Works better with decaf.
While the ExpoDisk ("ExpoDisc Professional Digital White Balance Filter" ) works just fine (and samples a larger area more accurately than a coffee filter), it remains significantly overpriced in my opinion.
Those who use them swear by them. No argument here, they work and work well.
Just for fun, my friend (who never leaves home without an Expo Disk hanging from her neck) and I did a non-scientific comparison. She used her ExpoDisk to set a white balance inside a church and I used my flash diffuser. We have the same cameras.
Back in post processing we compared the custom WB setting as well as the church interior images. We could not tell any difference visually on the same color calibrated monitor.
She was amazed and felt a tad foolish, but proudly recovered when she said that her $99 ExpoDisk comes with a neck lanyard and a manual while my $14 flash diffuser has neither.
I offered to buy her coffee with the money I saved.
It was an interesting comparison and a lesson on diminishing returns in advertising hype.
But,
-- if you don't know exactly what you are doing,
-- don't know what a custom WB really is,
-- never shoot RAW,
-- hate 18% grey cards,
-- are obsessed with nailing WB down beyond what your eye can readily perceive,
-- or you don't want to make even a small adjustment in PP,
then that $86 neck lanyard might be worthwhile.
BTW, I still don't have a lanyard for my multi-tasking flash diffuser.
quote=GoofyNewfie quote=jerryc41 quote=Erv I am... (