Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Software to Use for Batch Processing of Raw Photos
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 5, 2018 09:30:42   #
L-Fox
 
rmalarz wrote:
I've processed somewhere around 500 without an issue using Photoshop Bridge. For me, this involved changing size and outputting to jpg. Never had a problem. So, I don't see why you'd have a problem with 1000. They can also be output as tif files.

I believe irfanview can do this as well.
--Bob


I use the heck out of Irfanview & it's thumbnail function. It it will convert your RAW's to any one of myriad other type, single or in batch. However, it is actually using the 'embedded' JPG when it does so. I use Canon and don't enough about any other brand's RAW format. I find that usually TIF's made this way can be 'loaded as' in PS/PSE and then manipulated with ACR.
-
FYI, Iview does not provide layers but will work most Adobe compatible plug-ins just fine. It has excellent built-in documentation that can have you working in very little time.

Reply
Jan 5, 2018 11:48:37   #
Jeffers
 
Rather than RAW, if you're happy with the first edition of JPEGs, then you just need to learn how to manage them. You can copy & paste JPEGs until your heart's content and you will not trigger compression. You can rename them and you won't trigger compression. If you "Save as" you WILL trigger compression. If you have to make a lot of copies, you can save them as PNG's. The PNG will be no better than the JPEG, but it will never get worse, no matter how many times you copy it. While PNGs have no compression (good), the downside is they are much larger. For instance, I saved a 2.88 mb JPEG as a PNG and the PNG was 22.8 mb. This becomes a problem if you try to send them over the internet or don't plan for the larger size in your slideshow media.

Reply
Jan 5, 2018 12:03:04   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
Lightroom Classic CC is my personal choice and it would make fast work of what you are looking for. Best of luck.

Reply
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Jan 5, 2018 12:05:04   #
castello
 
Curve_in wrote:
I use Darktable. You can edit any size batch of raw files.

I agree with Kevin. Darktable is free, more powerful than Lightroom and once you figure out the UI, it's much faster too.
A wedding shoot usually results in 1000+ photos for me, which I can whittle down to a manageable 200 or so and I edit those to deliverable images, all within a two day process and almost never needing Photoshop or any other software.
Darktable is free for both Linux (which I run) and Windows.

Reply
Jan 5, 2018 12:21:14   #
sawdust_128
 
The latest is DXO photolab and it is still a monster when it comes to batch processing.

Reply
Jan 5, 2018 14:17:08   #
russelray Loc: La Mesa CA
 
MikeT9 wrote:
DxO in my opinion is the best software for batch processing raw files. It would take too long to go into detail but you can download it for free and try it for a month.
If you have come back from a trip with a 1000+ shots, let alone 4-5000 the first thing to do is to go through them, deleting the rubbish and the often countless number of duplicates before considering batch processing them.
I the would look and what I think are the best and consider whether or not to process them individually in photoshop.
DxO in my opinion is the best software for batch p... (show quote)

Depends on how long the trip was. I go out each day from 6:00 a.m. to noon and rarely come back with fewer than 500 pictures. So if I take a long road trip for a week and two weekends, I'm easily coming home with 4-5000 photos, none of which will be rubbish or duplicates. I batch process them and print proof sheets so I can go outside and look at them while sitting in the garden surrounded by wildlife.

Reply
Jan 5, 2018 15:58:13   #
Sandharbor
 
Thank You. Helpful info.

Reply
 
 
Jan 5, 2018 16:41:27   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Sandharbor wrote:
I am an amateur photographer who puts slideshows together of family travels. A typical trip can result in 1000+ saved photos. Historically I have been saving in the camera as JPEG. After several resaves to the computer, slideshow software, etc. , I have experienced the adverse compression effects of JPEG. I have been inspired to reconsider shooting in RAW based on discussions in UHH. Is there a photo software that allows you to batch process, say 1000 RAW photos, and get reasonable results like the camera JPEG in a short amount of time? These would be photos taken on different days with a multitude of light conditions and even some with flash. I would like to save them as TIFFs and circumvent the JPEG compression effects.
On select photos, I would then want to manipulate the RAW file further and optimize the photo.
I am an amateur photographer who puts slideshows t... (show quote)

Is your camera set to deliver JPEGs which are minimum compression / maximum size / maximum quality??

Reply
Jan 5, 2018 18:14:02   #
Sandharbor
 
Thanks. I'll check out DxO.

Reply
Jan 6, 2018 02:18:16   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
picsman wrote:
I also use capture one for my mtb images, which can be between 2000 and 4000 an event. CO processes these images very fast indeed, I have no knowledge of lightroom so can't comment on that. What I particularly like is applying auto adjustments and styles (like presets on other software) during the upload from the memory card. I only need to cull and reedit anything that the upload hasn't produced the result i want. Then export as jpg. As my images are for a website for sale to the competitors speed is a prerequisite and CO has that in spades.
I also use capture one for my mtb images, which ca... (show quote)


C1 and LR share similar capabilites, with the edge going to C1 on time to show preview, which LR is quite sluggish at. Also, C1 produces better initial results with less fuss than Lr. I primarily use LR because of its seamless integration will PS and plugins, which C1 lacks. At the end of the day I think both are quite excellent, with a possible slight edge going to Cq on the quality of the raw conversion.

I also use DXOPHOTOLAB (and optics pro since v.4) and generally like the results I get with it. I do not like the project-based file organzation. LR"s catalog is for more powerful and faster to use, as long as you take the small amount of time up front needed to learn it.

Reply
Jan 6, 2018 09:40:22   #
Sandharbor
 
Thanks

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Jan 6, 2018 11:00:31   #
Tinkerbell Loc: Bethalto IL
 
I use Lightroom for all batch processing and some individual editing then on to Photoshop.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.