In the film days, every company did it it differently. The thought was you would stick with one brand so that everything worked the same. Zooms were clockwise, counter clock wise, and even push pull and pull push. An even bigger headache was focus was the same way: turn left or turn right, each could be different. So you had all kinds of possibilities if you owned several brands of lenses. It was a real pain shooting high school sports, you really had to know your equipment. AF normalized half of the equation. Power Zooms help normalize too. But I don't really like power zoom.
In the days of film, my zooms were all push pull. For zooming creativity, I find push pull easier. I have learned to deal with turning zoom. After all, God gave me a brain(it was confirmed by a MRI earlier this year) to help me deal with the variety in life.
the zooming is not that much of a problem , the hand focus on the other hand is .one tele lens goes one way , the other the other .
Never noticed. I just turn it both ways until I get the picture I want!
Thanks all......good info, good opinions, and a few smiles along the way.....
from the first slr systems photographers have endlessly vetched about this - see canon/nikon.
no reason other than not so subtly direction the above mentioned body owner to same system lenses.
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
MT Shooter wrote:
Yes, but you had to turn that same ring to focus the lens!
I see that as an advantage. My left was serving three missions from one spot: (1) zooming (2) focusing (3) helping stabilize the system so the body didn't need a grip the size of Rhode Island
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.