Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon DX lens for wildlife.
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 14, 2017 11:28:37   #
streetmarty Loc: Brockton, Ma
 
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking around with the D7200 and the 16-80 and loving life, almost. I've been thinking about maybe trying a little bird photography. The only birds I ever shot were a couple on my bird feeder. So my Nikon DX options are 70-300 $399, 55-300 $399, 55-200 VRII $149, which I have covered with my current lens and not long enough. I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be, so the big monsters are out. Other than Fuji I know nothing about the other lens companies. What do you suggest? Thanks for the help...Marty

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 11:32:28   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
streetmarty wrote:
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking around with the D7200 and the 16-80 and loving life, almost. I've been thinking about maybe trying a little bird photography. The only birds I ever shot were a couple on my bird feeder. So my Nikon DX options are 70-300 $399, 55-300 $399, 55-200 VRII $149, which I have covered with my current lens and not long enough. I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be, so the big monsters are out. Other than Fuji I know nothing about the other lens companies. What do you suggest? Thanks for the help...Marty
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking aro... (show quote)


You can use a FX lens on a DX camera. You will be using the sweet spot of the lens. For birds I would suggest the Nikon 200-500. I use that for birds. Do not know your budget?
http://static.uglyhedgehog.com/upload/2017/12/14/410328-2c_43ce_bee7_5998cb818117.jpeg

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 11:55:30   #
Kfallsfotoman
 
Getting long glass on a budget is always a challenge.
For me minimum lens is a 300mm.
If you want to stay DX (no reason to do that) you might look at the nikon 18-300 -this would be especially good of you're Applying street technique to birding (keeping small and unnoticed).
If that doesn't matter look at sigma 150-600.
In either case check the used &ebay markets too.
Last if you're unsure look into rental market - small cost to avoid $1k mistake

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2017 11:58:24   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Tamron has a 150-600mm zoom that is in your budget.

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 12:00:02   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Look at a used Sigma 50-500mm.

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 12:01:11   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
Nikon 200-500 is a great lens. My wife shoots one. If you want to save a few bucks and still get some good reach I just received the Tamron 100-400 and it is incredibly sharp right out of the box.

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 12:06:09   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
streetmarty wrote:
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking around with the D7200 and the 16-80 and loving life, almost. I've been thinking about maybe trying a little bird photography. The only birds I ever shot were a couple on my bird feeder. So my Nikon DX options are 70-300 $399, 55-300 $399, 55-200 VRII $149, which I have covered with my current lens and not long enough. I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be, so the big monsters are out. Other than Fuji I know nothing about the other lens companies. What do you suggest? Thanks for the help...Marty
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking aro... (show quote)


I have used the Nikon DX AF-S Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR on my D7200 with wonderful results. It is light and easy to handhold. The only reason I switched to a FX lens is so I can use it on both my FX Df and my DX D7200.

Reply
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Dec 14, 2017 12:08:58   #
JPL
 
streetmarty wrote:
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking around with the D7200 and the 16-80 and loving life, almost. I've been thinking about maybe trying a little bird photography. The only birds I ever shot were a couple on my bird feeder. So my Nikon DX options are 70-300 $399, 55-300 $399, 55-200 VRII $149, which I have covered with my current lens and not long enough. I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be, so the big monsters are out. Other than Fuji I know nothing about the other lens companies. What do you suggest? Thanks for the help...Marty
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking aro... (show quote)


There are basically 3 lenses to choose from, if you can get a refurb one you will get it for somewhat less.
The leses are.
Nikon 200-500
Sigma 150-600
Tamron 150-600

Those are the best bang for the buck in the bird lens category.

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 12:10:45   #
3dees
 
Tamron or Sigma 100-400 are both within your price range. I have the Sigma and love it. I don't miss the tri pod collar as the lens is light enough to hand hold which I do most of the time anyway. the Tamron is 100.00 more and an extra 129.00 for the tri pod collar. on your dx camera you have a 150-600 and if you decide on going fx you don't have to sell the lens.

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 12:50:32   #
Jim Bob
 
PixelStan77 wrote:
You can use a FX lens on a DX camera. You will be using the sweet spot of the lens. For birds I would suggest the Nikon 200-500. I use that for birds. Do not know your budget?
http://static.uglyhedgehog.com/upload/2017/12/14/410328-2c_43ce_bee7_5998cb818117.jpeg


"I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be," Whether $400 is a little more only the OP can decide.

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 14:04:58   #
streetmarty Loc: Brockton, Ma
 
Jim Bob wrote:
"I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be," Whether $400 is a little more only the OP can decide.



Reply
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Dec 14, 2017 21:55:21   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
streetmarty wrote:
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking around with the D7200 and the 16-80 and loving life, almost. I've been thinking about maybe trying a little bird photography. The only birds I ever shot were a couple on my bird feeder. So my Nikon DX options are 70-300 $399, 55-300 $399, 55-200 VRII $149, which I have covered with my current lens and not long enough. I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be, so the big monsters are out. Other than Fuji I know nothing about the other lens companies. What do you suggest? Thanks for the help...Marty
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking aro... (show quote)


I suggest that you rent any lens you are considering buying. If you buy a lens based on your current budget of around "$1000" and the realize that the shots you are getting do not please you then you will have wasted your money on a lens that does not meet your needs. When shooting wildlife you need to get a quality lens in order to get a really good shot. Birds in flight can be difficult to get anyway and using the best possible lens will allow you to get, hopefully, the best possible shot. I use a Nikon D500 and two lenses, both Nikon, the 80-400 and the 200-500. I like the results better with the 200-500, although the 80-400 allows me to handhold and still does a pretty good job. I can recommend either of these lenses. I also have a Tamron 150-600 and used it for awhile, but twice it did not work, once fogged up and the other time auto focus went out; I no longer use it and it sits in a drawer. If you rent now, you can continue to save until you get the money together to buy a quality lens. Just my thought on it.

Reply
Dec 14, 2017 22:32:39   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
JPL wrote:
There are basically 3 lenses to choose from, if you can get a refurb one you will get it for somewhat less.
The leses are.
Nikon 200-500
Sigma 150-600
Tamron 150-600

Those are the best bang for the buck in the bird lens category.


I have the Nikkor. It's not built like a $10,000 500mm F/4.0
But the results are pretty darn close. It is reasonably light and the VR makes it hand holdable. I don't know the others first hand, but believe you would be happy with the 200-500

--

Reply
Dec 15, 2017 00:21:51   #
skywolf
 
I absolutely love the Tamron 150-600 with my Nikon D7100. It's kind of heavy, but if you train with it, you can get amazing shots.

Reply
Dec 15, 2017 06:29:20   #
Jerrin1 Loc: Wolverhampton, England
 
streetmarty wrote:
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking around with the D7200 and the 16-80 and loving life, almost. I've been thinking about maybe trying a little bird photography. The only birds I ever shot were a couple on my bird feeder. So my Nikon DX options are 70-300 $399, 55-300 $399, 55-200 VRII $149, which I have covered with my current lens and not long enough. I thinking my budget is around a grand, a little more if need be, so the big monsters are out. Other than Fuji I know nothing about the other lens companies. What do you suggest? Thanks for the help...Marty
Hello all, I am a street guy currently walking aro... (show quote)


I own a Nikon D500 and use a Nikkor 200 - 500mm f5.6 and a Nikkor 300mm f4 PF VR (+/- a Nikkor TC14EIII) for birds in flight. The 300mm PF VR is beautifully lightweight and produces excellent images both with and without the 1.4 TC. My 200 - 500mm is, however, my favourite lens - despite it's weight. In my hands it just seems to grab birds out of the sky without any effort, though the 300mm f4 PF VR is a marvellous lens for BIF and easier to hold for long periods. Neither lens is cheap, unfortunately. These days, I use my 300mm f4 in conjunction with my Olympus EM1 mark II and Oly 300mm f4, due to the latter being a bit hefty.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.