Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Bird lens
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 11, 2017 16:29:52   #
tenny52 Loc: San Francisco
 
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:33:26   #
vonzip Loc: cape cod
 
I've had good luck with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6. I believe this is for a dx camera but I'm not sure.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:41:16   #
whwiden
 
vonzip wrote:
I've had good luck with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6. I believe this is for a dx camera but I'm not sure.


Works on fx or dx. Consider Tamron 150-600mm G2.

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 11, 2017 16:42:52   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
The 200-500 is a good choice...it is an FX lens. I also use the newly acquired Tamron 150-600 G2 and it appears, so far, that the 200-500 is quicker to focus.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:46:06   #
runakid Loc: Shelbyville, TN
 
Nikon 200-500 is perfect- in my opinion.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:51:00   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
On a budget, the Nikkor 55-300 AFS VR zoom. 50% more reach, light enough for handheld, used on ebay for about $250.

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 16:53:20   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
tenny52 wrote:
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?

Backyard birds or something else? backyard birds won't require lenses that long. I shoot them with a 300mm F4 Nikkor AF or shorter. What focal length will depend on what birds & how close...

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Dec 11, 2017 19:16:25   #
tenny52 Loc: San Francisco
 
Thanks folks, 200-500mm range seems a good choice, but it is too expensive to my liking of birds. I think NG photographers probably use that to shoot eagle snapping up a fish.
The 55-300mm DX looks right, but it seems a little wasteful since it overlaps a partial range portion of my fx 70-200mm.
Would a 300mm DX is equivalent to a FF 400mm with an effective pixel count of 18000 down from 24000?
What would it be like looking through a DX lens on my D610? Does it still occupy the whole view finder or only partially?

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 21:55:40   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
The 55-300 is equivalent to a 450mm on a FF. What you see on the DX is what you would see at 450mm on a FF. It occupies the whole frame. I never used my 55-200 again after I got the 55-300. The lens will work well on any Nikon DX camera of any MP. I got my 55-300 used on ebay for about $250.

tenny52 wrote:
Thanks folks, 200-500mm range seems a good choice, but it is too expensive to my liking of birds. I think NG photographers probably use that to shoot eagle snapping up a fish.
The 55-300mm DX looks right, but it seems a little wasteful since it overlaps a partial range portion of my fx 70-200mm.
Would a 300mm DX is equivalent to a FF 400mm with an effective pixel count of 18000 down from 24000?
What would it be like looking through a DX lens on my D610? Does it still occupy the whole view finder or only partially?
Thanks folks, 200-500mm range seems a good choice,... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 11, 2017 22:41:29   #
tenny52 Loc: San Francisco
 
thanks, can anyone tell me the difference with that 55-300mm and the other 70-300mm which is much cheaper?

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 08:08:02   #
Jim Bob
 
vonzip wrote:
I've had good luck with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6. I believe this is for a dx camera but I'm not sure.


It's a full frame lens but works extremely well on DX with the 1.5 crop factor.

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2017 08:09:41   #
Jim Bob
 
DaveO wrote:
The 200-500 is a good choice...it is an FX lens. I also use the newly acquired Tamron 150-600 G2 and it appears, so far, that the 200-500 is quicker to focus.


My observations as well. The Sigma 150-600 Contemporary is also quicker to focus than the G2.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 08:55:19   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Jim Bob wrote:
My observations as well. The Sigma 150-600 Contemporary is also quicker to focus than the G2.


I use manual focus with the G2 for birds not in flight or when using the 1.4X. It is easy enough to do. I need fairly decent light with the max aperture at F9. I have only used it on the D500.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 08:55:50   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
tenny52 wrote:
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?


I guess it depends on your budget.
I use the Sigma 100-400mm on my D7200.
You don't want to use a DX lens on your FX D610.

Reply
Dec 12, 2017 09:51:26   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
tenny52 wrote:
I have my D610 and my longest lens is a FX 70-200mm. If I want to shoot birds, what lens should I buy on a budget, DX/FX, auto/manual, zoom/prime, Nikkor/non ?


Your camera has a FF sensor so no crop factor. If it's just birds, I'd look for a prime at 300mm or 400mm with a 1.4 or 1.5 power converter. A budget limit will reduce the quality and the speed but I don't think it would be any worse than a budget telephoto zoom. The 1.5X converter would get you out to 600mm on a 400mm prime.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.