Tax Cut?
Dec 5, 2017 10:34:08 #
Twardlow
Loc: Arkansas
EyeSawYou wrote:
LOL I just gave you empirical evidence from history that it works and wells well, denial is not a fact. lol you lose. By the way, you are implying that JFK is lying?
And I gave you information that said professional economists by a huge margin don’t believe it.
Dec 5, 2017 10:38:21 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
"…Tax rates are too high today and tax revenu... (show quote)
I believe we are at full employment now.
Dec 5, 2017 10:39:08 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
LOL I just gave you empirical evidence from history that it works and wells well, denial is not a fact. lol you lose. By the way, you are implying that JFK is lying?
Are you suggesting that he never did?
Dec 5, 2017 19:55:25 #
Twardlow wrote:
And I gave you information that said professional economists by a huge margin don’t believe it.
LOL I'm not talking about the Laffer Curve in this instance....talking about the result of cutting taxes which is increase of Gov revenue....it's undeniable. LOL you did not give me
"information that said professional economists by a huge margin don’t believe it", you included a wikipedia link that made the unfounded claim. LOL you are lost man.....you deny truth when presented....only an idiot could not see this truth.
Dec 5, 2017 19:58:40 #
thom w wrote:
Are you suggesting that he never did?
LOL diverting again?? that's not what I said...you are making the attempt to move the goal post...I specifically ask if you think JFK was lying about what he said about tax cuts.....you are a lying pathetic Liberal...you bias mind is so locked into your party you can't even see the truth, you deny truth at all cost.
Dec 5, 2017 19:59:32 #
thom w wrote:
I believe we are at full employment now.
We are at full employment now??? LOLOLLOL we have a 0% unemployment rate now??? LOL
Dec 5, 2017 21:49:13 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
LOL I'm not talking about the Laffer Curve in this instance....talking about the result of cutting taxes which is increase of Gov revenue....it's undeniable. LOL you did not give me
"information that said professional economists by a huge margin don’t believe it", you included a wikipedia link that made the unfounded claim. LOL you are lost man.....you deny truth when presented....only an idiot could not see this truth.
"information that said professional economists by a huge margin don’t believe it", you included a wikipedia link that made the unfounded claim. LOL you are lost man.....you deny truth when presented....only an idiot could not see this truth.
Wow, idiot, not lunatic. I'm impressed.
Dec 5, 2017 21:50:47 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
LOL diverting again?? that's not what I said...you are making the attempt to move the goal post...I specifically ask if you think JFK was lying about what he said about tax cuts.....you are a lying pathetic Liberal...you bias mind is so locked into your party you can't even see the truth, you deny truth at all cost.
I've been patient, but we're through.
Dec 5, 2017 21:53:20 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
We are at full employment now??? LOLOLLOL we have a 0% unemployment rate now??? LOL
Except possibly during part of WWII have we ever had 0% unemployment? Would have continued this but after your last post to me I'm not interested. You need to learn how to talk to people.
Dec 5, 2017 23:40:40 #
thom w wrote:
Except possibly during part of WWII have we ever had 0% unemployment? Would have continued this but after your last post to me I'm not interested. You need to learn how to talk to people.
Tom aren't you the one that said we are at full employment now?
Dec 5, 2017 23:46:18 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
letmedance wrote:
Tom aren't you the one that said we are at full employment now?
I don't believe full employment is 0% unemployment. If I'm wrong, then I am.
Dec 6, 2017 00:12:54 #
thom w wrote:
I don't believe full employment is 0% unemployment. If I'm wrong, then I am.
OK.
Dec 6, 2017 00:57:07 #
thom w wrote:
I don't believe full employment is 0% unemployment. If I'm wrong, then I am.
How can full employment be anything but 0% unemployment???
Dec 6, 2017 06:39:22 #
You are correct.
thom w wrote:
I don't believe full employment is 0% unemployment. If I'm wrong, then I am.
Dec 6, 2017 19:28:28 #
Yankeepapa6
Loc: New York City
nakkh wrote:
Fact is, the republican tax 'plan' is a piece of shit.
ROMBLTOLOL-
ROMBLTOLOL-
www.msn.com/en-us/money/personalfinance/heres-what-trumps-tax-plan-means-for-people-at-every-income-level-from-dollar20000-to-dollar269000-a-year/ss-BBGhnEj?li=BBnb7Kz#image=45
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.