Do any of you have any experience with the Lee filter system with a DSLR? It is expensive, I know, but it appears much more flexible than individual screw-in filters. There are other systems available (Cokin for one) that are less expensive, but my initial research seems to indicate that they are only marginally so. Have you experienced any downsides to the Lee system--other than the cost?
jeryh
Loc: Oxfordshire UK
I used the `lee system on my Hasselblad superwide for a longtime; it was ideal for what i used it for. It is EXPENSIVE, but good kit usually is! You really need to work out exactly what you need from your kit, and how it relates to the DSLR you are going to use. The Lee system is all based round 100mm square glass/polyester filiters, with the ancillary holders and mounting kit to fit your camera. The basic kit costs about £120, with the filters extra. By specifying exactly what you want, and proposed use before you buy, you will save yourself a lot of grief !
Lees are fantastic, and Lee is uber expensive. However, there are excellent alternatives right now from Breakthrough Photography. Particulary is the X100 filter holder and adapter rings. Lee sells the holder for $170, and the adapter rings for $35. And, I have had Lee's adapter rings pop out of a lens and make a suicidal dive to the ground. Breakthroughs' holder is $49 and is a far superior design and their adapter rings are only $7.
As far as Cokin, there is no US distributor, not dealer, but distributor.
Falcon wrote:
Do any of you have any experience with the Lee filter system with a DSLR? It is expensive, I know, but it appears much more flexible than individual screw-in filters. There are other systems available (Cokin for one) that are less expensive, but my initial research seems to indicate that they are only marginally so. Have you experienced any downsides to the Lee system--other than the cost?
I had a few and they are way overated! I did not like any of them and they are way too expensive for what you get! I got rid of them in a hurry (bad color casts)!
Thanks for the tip about Breakthrough Photography. I was not aware of them. I'll check them out.
I prefer Haida filter system myself.
Cokin (ND and Vari ND) had a reputation for bad colour casts. But that was pre-Digital cameras, when Slide Film was the norm. Lee for me, means better quality.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Falcon wrote:
Do any of you have any experience with the Lee filter system with a DSLR? It is expensive, I know, but it appears much more flexible than individual screw-in filters. There are other systems available (Cokin for one) that are less expensive, but my initial research seems to indicate that they are only marginally so. Have you experienced any downsides to the Lee system--other than the cost?
I now use the NiSi system because it allows a polarizer filter to be turned in a full circle while mounted on the inside of the holder (Lee does not offer this technique). This is very important to me as I shoot a lot of waterscapes. The NiSi system is very durable, not as extensive as Lee but for what I do it is ideal.
I use Formatt-Hitech for long exposure set-ups. Most times just have a BW circ polarizer and shade on.
All good info regarding Haida and NiSi filter systems. Thank you. I will spend some time evaluating equipment and prices, but they both look very interesting.
Also the info on Formatt-Hitech. I had thought they were part of Cokin.
formatt-hitech beefie holder, all aluminium.
speters wrote:
I got rid of them in a hurry (bad color casts)!
Seriously? The 100 mm system that Professionals swear by? Were you using screw on or the rectangular filters?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.