truetexan wrote:
We signed up for PSP last year along with LR. Both CC. Now my wife thinks and has had suggested to her that we look at Affinity as a replacement. I have just started feeling comfortable with Lightroom, and my wife and i both took an online class together for PSP last year. Just a quick look at reviews and comparisons online have left me a little confused. Obviously price is a huge factor. As an amateur photog I am not totally engrossed in the use of either PSP or LR. Sooo, just wondering how many have used both and those fellow hoggers that have, what are your thoughts...thanks ya'll...
We signed up for PSP last year along with LR. Both... (
show quote)
I assume that PSP is referring to Paint Shop Pro. I have a few concerns about what Adobe's plans for Lightroom are. When they labeled it "Classic," and gave the Lightroom CC name to a currently dumbed-down product, that raised alarm bells with me. "Classic" usually means legacy product, which means nearly at end of life. Nevertheless, I don't think this year is the right time to depart from Adobe. After all, LR Classic CC was given a couple new features, and it's as good as before.
If Adobe starts trying to force me into the cloud version, or raises prices materially, or announces an end-of-support date, then it's time to be thinking about saying adios. But, any replacement product would have to meet these requirements:
1) I'd like the successor to be able to read either the LR catalog or .XMP sidecar files, so I don't lose my edits, and so I can continue to re-edit.
2) It needs to be a non-destructive editor.
3) I'd like the successor file to import keywords, stars, color codes, captions, EXIF data, etc. Especially keywords.
4) It has to have at least 95% of the feature set of LR, not only in the Develop module, but also in the Print and Library Modules. Slideshow capability would be nice, but not a deal killer. Book Module - take it or leave it. Map Module - meh. It never was useful to me anyway.
5) The successor product has to be well-documented, with lots of YouTube videos, web articles, and, hopefully, a few books about it. That pretty much eliminates the open-source products.
6) It should be backed by a pretty good company. I don't want to go through a migration more than one time. For that reason, On1, ACDSee, and Capture 1 look pretty good. A few years ago, Corel let me down when it took way over a year to support my new camera in Aftershot Pro. Unforgivable. I won't buy from them. BTW, they make PSP.
I hope you find this useful.