Curved Monitor vs. Conventional
How do the curved monitors compare against the conventional (flat) monitors for Photography (editing) use? Better, same or not as good?
How do the curved monitors compare against the conventional (flat) monitors for Photography (editing) use? Better, same or not as good? And why?
Interesting question, to which I have no clue, but I'm going to watch this topic as I think about my next monitor.
Sorry for the double post. Not sure how that happened....
Papa Joe wrote:
How do the curved monitors compare against the conventional (flat) monitors for Photography (editing) use? Better, same or not as good?
Not as good in the corners.
I think the curved screen is a gimmick.
Papa Joe wrote:
How do the curved monitors compare against the conventional (flat) monitors for Photography (editing) use? Better, same or not as good? And why?
For work I’d like a curved monitor. Maybe for TV but have never watched a movie on a large curved Samsun.
At home with Lightroom and my MPB, I bought a 27” Auses (sp?) that takes as much resolution my computer pumps out. Both my wife and I are happy with that monitor.
It's a gimmick for suckers.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
Papa Joe wrote:
How do the curved monitors compare against the conventional (flat) monitors for Photography (editing) use? Better, same or not as good? And why?
All the fancy (expensive) gizmos in a TV---smart screen--high refresh rate--4K--Curved screen--impact resistance--OLED ,QLED --curved screen, etc are designed for movie viewing. If you are not using the monitor for thaand just using it for phototography, you would be pissing your money away. It also depends upon how big you want to go. If you have too much money, get an all the above 70' screen for $2500 (and send some that extra dough my way). But if you are using the screen for photography a 42" flat screen for about $400 is far more than adequate
boberic wrote:
All the fancy (expensive) gizmos in a TV---smart screen--high refresh rate--4K--Curved screen--impact resistance--OLED ,QLED --curved screen, etc are designed for movie viewing. If you are not using the monitor for thaand just using it for photography, you would be pissing your money away. It also depends upon how big you want to go. If you have too much money, get an all the above 70' screen for $2500 (and send some that extra dough my way). But if you are using the screen for photography a 42" flat screen for about $400 is far more than adequate
All the fancy (expensive) gizmos in a TV---smart s... (
show quote)
I agree, just make sure your monitor can handle the max res output of your computer. Example my MBP is 2560x1440 which my Asus 27" can handle. It looks good and was not that expensive at the time I purchased it. I use display port out of the mac... Technaclly tbolt to a docking station and display port from the docking station to the monitor. Looks better than HDMI into the monitor.
Smudgey
Loc: Ohio, Calif, Now Arizona
Basically, much to do about nothing with a monitor or TV. Really no advantage at all.
INHO, curved screens were developed because sales of flat screens had slowed down.
bkyser
Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
I think it's perfect.......if you are going to print curved photos. (just kidding)
I looked into them, and settled on a dedicated BenQ monitor, and I'm telling you, a monitor makes a huge difference.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.