Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon/Nikkor Lens
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Oct 12, 2017 12:42:18   #
Clauz Loc: MA
 
SusanFromVermont wrote:
I agree with the OP who suggest working on your technique before looking at new lenses. Do you understand the exposure triangle? [shutter speed, aperture, ISO] Each of these settings will affect the other, so it is important to know what each does and how they interact. How you hold the camera can make a difference for camera shake.

Also, before buying a new lens, you will need to know what will be the best choice for what you want to do. For instance: Portraits, Landscapes, Wildlife, Extreme Closeups [Macro], each have their own focal lengths and apertures that work best, and different lenses also will have a "sweet spot" where they have maximum sharpness. Good glass is generally more expensive as well as heavier. I like lenses that offer the maximum aperture of f/2.8 which makes it good for low light as well as daylight or studio lighting. Another factor is focal length range. Prime lenses are generally the sharpest, but less convenient than a zoom. For zoom lenses, the smaller the focal length range, the more likely they are to be sharper throughout most of their focal lengths. These days, there are a lot of "super-zooms", and new technology has made them much better at sharpness over their focal lengths. But for older zooms the theory still applies.

My recommendation is to work on your technique and understanding of exposure settings, then before deciding to buy a new lens, decide what you want to use it for, and then research lenses which would fulfill your requirements. Don't overlook the use of FX lenses on your DX camera. Just make sure you know how the crop-factor will affect the image. This will add a lot more lenses to your possibilities!

One more thing: when responding to someone's post, use the "quote reply" so it is clear who you are speaking to!

Hope this helps.
Susan
I agree with the OP who suggest working on your te... (show quote)


Thank you, Susan

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 12:58:18   #
Gitchigumi Loc: Wake Forest, NC
 
orrie smith wrote:
Not knowing, you may want to look into a good sturdy tripod. If your main interest is landscape and stills, a good tripod coupled with a 35mm or 50mm lens should satisfy your needs. A faster lens is not necessarily the answer. Stabilizing your camera is. Good luck.

Yes... tripod! Or, a monopod works too. Both my wife and I prefer and use monopods due to their compactness and ease of moving around. Heck, I even use mine like a cane, or walking stick, if I need some extra stability while negotiating uneven terrain!

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 12:59:47   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
Me to.

Gitchigumi wrote:
Yes... tripod! Or, a monopod works too. Both my wife and I prefer and use monopods due to their compactness and ease of moving around. Heck, I even use mine like a cane, or walking stick, if I need some extra stability while negotiating uneven terrain!

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2017 13:36:42   #
shelty Loc: Medford, OR
 
Clauz wrote:
I am interested in obtaining a faster lens to use on my Nikon D7000.

Im thinking a little faster lens will sharpen uo my photos a bit and be a better lens for lower light.

Not sure if this thinking is correct, but Id like to know what you folks think.

Thank ahead of time.

Btw the way, most of my photos are landscapes, flowers, street photos....

Bruce


It's been historically true that wider aperture lenses are less sharp than lenses with a smaller aperture.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 13:50:26   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Clauz wrote:
I am interested in obtaining a faster lens to use on my Nikon D7000.

Im thinking a little faster lens will sharpen uo my photos a bit and be a better lens for lower light.

Not sure if this thinking is correct, but Id like to know what you folks think.

Thank ahead of time.

Btw the way, most of my photos are landscapes, flowers, street photos....

Bruce

Why would a faster lens sharpen your pictures more (?), accurate focus will do that, not the speed of a lens!

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 14:00:42   #
jouster Loc: Witlesss Protection Program
 
I'm pleased with the Nikon DX 35mm f /1.8 lens that I've used for a few years on my D5100 and D7000, and now on my D7200. It is sharp and the two stops more allow me to use higher shutter speed and/or lower ISO. I like the Bokeh.

All other things being equal, a fixed focal length lens will be sharper than a zoom lens.


Clauz wrote:
I am interested in obtaining a faster lens to use on my Nikon D7000.
Im thinking a little faster lens will sharpen uo my photos a bit and be a better lens for lower light.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 15:12:28   #
RodB Loc: Dallas/Mckinney
 
Clauz wrote:
I am interested in obtaining a faster lens to use on my Nikon D7000.

Im thinking a little faster lens will sharpen uo my photos a bit and be a better lens for lower light.

Not sure if this thinking is correct, but Id like to know what you folks think.

Thank ahead of time.

Btw the way, most of my photos are landscapes, flowers, street photos....

Bruce


I'd recommend getting an 18-200 DX VR or VR2 (used about $300) the Vibration resistance allows you to get sharper photos and with increasing the ISO you can avoid buying an expensive large f/stop lens. The D7000 takes great pics and the 18-200 takes incredible photos and can focus close like a macro. Used lenses are usually in good shape.

The 35mm f/1.8 is about $200 and works great for low light situations.

More information than you likely want but will help you decide on a lens.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/dx-dream-team.htm

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2017 16:04:23   #
David in Dallas Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
 
The only way a "faster" lens would improve sharpness would be by making it possible to use a faster shutter speed and thus reduce motion blur, or a smaller ISO.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 18:52:36   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
Grand wrote:
50mm lens is very good 1.8



Reply
Oct 12, 2017 19:00:32   #
orrie smith Loc: Kansas
 
shelty wrote:
It's been historically true that wider aperture lenses are less sharp than lenses with a smaller aperture.


I would respectfully disagree. You are correct that a wider aperture brings in less of the photo in focus, creating bokah. But the object that you are focusing on will be in focus, with the objects that are on a different plane will blur. If you are shooting landscape, you will get more in focus with a larger aperture number (closing the aperture), but if you want to focus on a flower, or face, or some other object, and want the rest of the photo to blur out to accent the main subject, a larger aperture opening (smaller aperture number) is needed.
Lenses with a larger aperture opening are considered "fast" lenses simply because they allow more light in with larger aperture openings, but when you start closing the aperture down, they are no faster than any other lens with the same aperture setting.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 19:41:13   #
terry44 Loc: Tuolumne County California, Maui Hawaii
 
What lenses are you currently using, for landscapes and flowers and static building a good tripod will help you obtain sharper shots. Faster as has already been stated is not what you need.
Clauz wrote:
I am interested in obtaining a faster lens to use on my Nikon D7000.

Im thinking a little faster lens will sharpen uo my photos a bit and be a better lens for lower light.

Not sure if this thinking is correct, but Id like to know what you folks think.

Thank ahead of time.

Btw the way, most of my photos are landscapes, flowers, street photos....

Bruce

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2017 20:08:08   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
terry44 wrote:
What lenses are you currently using......


Please read the thread. OP answered that on page 1.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 20:42:48   #
terry44 Loc: Tuolumne County California, Maui Hawaii
 
OddJobber wrote:
Please read the thread. OP answered that on page 1.



Reply
Oct 13, 2017 12:36:54   #
Sinewsworn Loc: Port Orchard, WA
 
Brucej67 wrote:
The Nikon 60mm f2.8 G lens would be good for macro (flowers) as well as street photography, but you will need a wide lens also for landscape which would be one in the DX line Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 12-24mm f/4G.


The 85mm f3.5 (127 on a DX body) is about perfect for macro and portrait work.

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 10:04:11   #
tomcat
 
Clauz wrote:
I have and use the following lens....AF-S Nikkor 18-200 MM 1:3.5-5.6 DX, and a AF-S Micro Nikkor 60mm 1:2.8G ED Lens which I use for Shooting close up ups etc....



I have the 18-200 lens that I use for a walking around lens. It is not known for its acute sharpness, although it can be sharp at f/8 and high shutter speed. But it's convenient which is why I use it. Depending upon what type of lens you want, there are many good suggestions offered so far. My fav is now the Sigma Art series of lenses. Incredibly sharp.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.