Big Brother is Watching?
Oct 12, 2017 05:54:00 #
Just Fred wrote:
Capturing this little bugger was quite the challenge.
Your are either real lucky OR one excellent photographer
Oct 12, 2017 06:36:53 #
FiddleMaker wrote:
Your are either real lucky OR one excellent photographer
A little of both, perhaps?
Oct 12, 2017 07:37:05 #
The new way of the future. There will be so many drones in the sky one day, you"ll need to ware a hard hat when the drones collide with each other lol.
Oct 12, 2017 08:04:58 #
yeah....scenics at the nudist camp. LOL
bsprague wrote:
I badly want a remote control flying camera. I promise not to spy and only shoot scenics. FWIW, I was a real military spy once!
Oct 12, 2017 08:07:38 #
JeffL
Loc: New Jersey
bsprague wrote:
I only spied on evil, bad and nasty enemies. I would never spy on nice people.
Been there, done that.
Oct 12, 2017 08:31:14 #
Lowrider
Loc: Kennesaw, GA
jeep_daddy wrote:
That's what everyone things but the little cameras on those things see people like ants from way up in the sky. They don't have super telephoto cameras and lenses on them like the new helicopters do. They simply take landscape pictures and/or videos of the landscape.
Now if you see one hovering in front of your window, THEN you have a problem.
Now if you see one hovering in front of your window, THEN you have a problem.
Check this out and it is only a matter of time until the price comes down. I recently saw a drone that could carry a full size Canon DLSR.
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8qxe93/this-drone-zoom-lens-can-identify-your-face-from-1000-feet-away
Oct 12, 2017 14:33:07 #
NJphotodoc wrote:
I'm building a jammer which is basically just a wi... (show quote)
https://www.fcc.gov/general/jammer-enforcement
Thanks for letting us FCC licensed folks know that you are planning on WILLFULLY violating FEDERAL LAW.
Here is a case where the proposed fine for manufacturing jammers was $34,912,500 - https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2014/FCC-14-92A1.html
Here is another case where the proposed fine for the use of jammers was $126,000 - https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2013/FCC-13-46A1.html
Here is another case where the proposed fine for the use of jammers was $144,000 - https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2013/FCC-13-47A1.html
Good luck with your asinine criminal enterprise.
Oct 12, 2017 23:25:13 #
Oct 13, 2017 04:26:37 #
Oct 13, 2017 05:05:30 #
Oct 13, 2017 07:30:21 #
Rathyatra wrote:
Good shot with the P900 - handheld?
Absolutely. I can't imagine trying to track a drone with a camera on a tripod!
Oct 13, 2017 09:14:41 #
Just Fred wrote:
Absolutely. I can't imagine trying to track a drone with a camera on a tripod!
You did well - when I extend my P900 zoomsignificantly the lens waves about and it is hard to control - I probably need more practice.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.