Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Tripod recommendations
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Jun 3, 2012 21:39:36   #
Lionsgate Loc: Sierra Vista, Arizona
 
http://www.manfrotto.us/

Reply
Jun 4, 2012 21:20:42   #
shirl2sg Loc: Northern Minnesota
 
This article will help, I too am checking into what I want and need in a tripod.
http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/tripods-and-monopods-guide/

Reply
Jun 4, 2012 23:10:12   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
shirl2sg wrote:
This article will help, I too am checking into what I want and need in a tripod.
http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/tripods-and-monopods-guide/



25 years ago I purchased an NPC ball head for $275. It lasted till this past April. I then purchased an Acratech ball head for $275 and fully expect it to last 25yrs (it is fully guaranteed for 10). The legs and durability of any tripod is important - but the head......you gotta have a good head....on your shoulders and on the pod. Check out the Acratech Ultimate ball head - weighs less than a pound and will hold 25 lbs.

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2012 11:50:04   #
Shutterbugsailer Loc: Staten Island NY (AKA Cincinnati by the Sea)
 
Just a few more thoughts about $4500.00 tripods and other over the top equipment; I don't begrudge the rich gadget freak with FU money from buying them. However, anyone who thinks owning this stuff will make them the next Ansel Adams is as delusional as the 40 year old "weekend warrior" who drops 10K on a custom made titanium bike, hoping the be the next Lance Armstrong, or the 85 year old widower, living on a fixed income in a 1 bedroom apartment, who splashes on AXE cologne, expecting to show up at the next American Legion bingo tournament with a Dallas Cowboys cheerleader on his arm

Reply
Jun 5, 2012 11:54:25   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
Shutterbugsailer wrote:
Just a few more thoughts about $4500.00 tripods and other over the top equipment; I don't begrudge the rich gadget freak with FU money from buying them. However, anyone who thinks owning this stuff will make them the next Ansel Adams is as delusional as the 40 year old "weekend warrior" who drops 10K on a custom made titanium bike, hoping the be the next Lance Armstrong, or the 85 year old widower, living on a fixed income in a 1 bedroom apartment, who splashes on AXE cologne, expecting to show up at the next American Legion bingo tournament with a Dallas Cowboys cheerleader on his arm
Just a few more thoughts about $4500.00 tripods an... (show quote)


ya think?

Reply
Jun 5, 2012 12:19:05   #
planepics Loc: St. Louis burbs, but originally Chicago burbs
 
I wasn't thinking about buying the stupid thing. It would cost more than I've made so far this year. I was just shocked and flabbergasted that a camera holder could be that expensive. I definitely want to upgrade my flimsy cheap DigiPower tripod (it's light, but would blow over if I breathed on it), but I would have to limit myself to something around $100...and that would be stretching my budget. Anything worthwhile for that price?

Reply
Jun 5, 2012 12:49:24   #
Shutterbugsailer Loc: Staten Island NY (AKA Cincinnati by the Sea)
 
Planepics, I didn't think that you or anyone else on the "Hog" would buy it either. Just having a little fun on the site and making a general commentary about over the top spending. Obviously selling your cameras to buy that tripod makes as much sense as my selling my sailboat, which I keep at a municipal marina, so I can afford to join a private yacht club. As to the subject of tripods, one size doesn't fit all. I just picked up an old 10 lb Husky tripod at a garage sale for $5.00. Great piece of equpment as long as you are not carrying it around all day. For that I have both a lightweight Targus tripod and monopod. When all is said and done, the best tripod is the one you have with you, and anything is better than nothing at all. As to that bicycle workstand, which I converted, it was just a winter project when it was too cold to sail, the leaves had fallen off the trees, but not cold enough to snow and take winter pictures

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2012 19:44:21   #
Lionsgate Loc: Sierra Vista, Arizona
 
My Bogan tripod is about 20 years old. It's heavy and clunky but I love it. I take a lot of outdoor pictures and sometimes in high wind. This gem has held my various cameras steady in near hurricane force winds. I recently purchased a light weight (14 once) to use in museums or other places where I need stability AND mobility. There are advantages to having more than one. If you can find both a light weight and heavy duty that have interchangeable "quick release" heads that would be the best way to go.

p.s. I also have a very portable flexible mono-pod that can be attached to chair, pole, steering wheel for use with light weight cameras. It comes in handy.

Reply
Jun 5, 2012 20:46:56   #
DickC Loc: NE Washington state
 
I've been using a SLIK U-212 for years, it's outlived 5 cameras and still holds up my Pentax 6x7 with a 200mm lens.

Dick

Reply
Jun 9, 2012 04:04:03   #
2th Loc: Tehran
 
I have a bolex monopod . and love it. can help ,very old ad swiss made.look for one won,t regret it. Dr.Farzin

Reply
Jun 21, 2012 18:06:31   #
snogost67 Loc: dayton, montana
 
snogost67 wrote:
I am in the market for a new tripod. I am up for suggestions as to what most folks are using and what they like about their tripods.
90% of my photography is wildlife & wildlife in action using a Tamron 200-500mm lens so I need heavy duty (no sag) and fluidity of movement.
Thanks in advance for all suggestions.


Thank you to everyone who posted about the tripods. I finally purchased a used one off ebay. A Bogen/Manfrotto 3021N tripod with a Cambo CBH-5 ballhead with quick release. I am still waiting for it to get here and will report how I like it once I've tried it out. Once again, thanks for all the replies!

Reply
 
 
Jul 8, 2012 09:36:11   #
2th Loc: Tehran
 
according to kenrockwell chuck noris of digital photography we don,t need tripod anymore . do you agre ?

Reply
Jul 8, 2012 09:45:13   #
Bigdaver
 
You can replace the clamp only for about $40 with the smallest Kirk quick release.
I use Arca type on all my equipment, either Kirk or RRS.

snowbear wrote:
Manfrotto 055XBPRO w/ Manfrotto 486RC2 (medium duty) ball head. My only regret is the ball head uses a proprietary quick release plate instead of a standard Arco-Swiss type. Someday, I'll replace the head.

Reply
Jul 8, 2012 10:39:03   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
Well... I have to differ on the Manfrotto ideas... I did pay about $500 on what seemed to be a pretty stout Manfrotto and and Ball Head. Nope. Coffee Nerves, and the camera shutter induces sympathetic vibrations in the tripod which last seconds. Maybe not that big a deal when shooting stills at 1/1000, but when things get slooow, like 2 minutes in DSLR video, for example, the coffee nerves are a marvel to watch settle down over the first few seconds, especially with big telephotos past 600mm, like a 600mm full frame on a DX 1.5x crop.

Gotta retrieve my loaned out Gitzo Tele Studex Giant, sadly no longer made, but apart from multi thousand dollar cine tripods, I doubt any of the "lets make it really light" tripods in the world could even begin to compare in basic tripod perfection and ruggedness. No coffee nerves.

Funny, I was looking at Really Right Stuff's top tripod just now, and it has a load rating of 50 pounds. Almost comical when I think of loading my old Gitzo with a few hundred pounds of jib and movie camera. You don't even think about it. Also, the 58 inch max height of the RRS top carbon fiber tripod is a little short of the 144 inch max height of the Gitzo.

Sometimes, we set the Gitzo at about 7 feet and put the jib on it, giving LOW (few inch lens height off the ground) and quite HIGH (over 12 feet) boom reaches. Stick that on a dolly...

All that said, I am considering that Really Right Stuff tripod. I have been searching for a decent lightweight solution.

Reply
Jul 8, 2012 17:00:25   #
Bigdaver
 
Yes, I tried the rest, then got a Gitzo 320, I'll never be able to use less again. I have big ball heads and clamps, with L-brackets on my cameras. So steady after using so many lesser setups.
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
Well... I have to differ on the Manfrotto ideas... I did pay about $500 on what seemed to be a pretty stout Manfrotto and and Ball Head. Nope. Coffee Nerves, and the camera shutter induces sympathetic vibrations in the tripod which last seconds. Maybe not that big a deal when shooting stills at 1/1000, but when things get slooow, like 2 minutes in DSLR video, for example, the coffee nerves are a marvel to watch settle down over the first few seconds, especially with big telephotos past 600mm, like a 600mm full frame on a DX 1.5x crop.

Gotta retrieve my loaned out Gitzo Tele Studex Giant, sadly no longer made, but apart from multi thousand dollar cine tripods, I doubt any of the "lets make it really light" tripods in the world could even begin to compare in basic tripod perfection and ruggedness. No coffee nerves.

Funny, I was looking at Really Right Stuff's top tripod just now, and it has a load rating of 50 pounds. Almost comical when I think of loading my old Gitzo with a few hundred pounds of jib and movie camera. You don't even think about it. Also, the 58 inch max height of the RRS top carbon fiber tripod is a little short of the 144 inch max height of the Gitzo.

Sometimes, we set the Gitzo at about 7 feet and put the jib on it, giving LOW (few inch lens height off the ground) and quite HIGH (over 12 feet) boom reaches. Stick that on a dolly...

All that said, I am considering that Really Right Stuff tripod. I have been searching for a decent lightweight solution.
Well... I have to differ on the Manfrotto ideas...... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.