So therefore the ballhead will allow to go portrait.
imagemeister wrote:
You need a rotating collar on the lens or an L bracket or other similar bracketing ....
Actually, you can - and I have used - two tilt heads stacked - one on top of the other at right angles to each other. This will allow for going to portrait orientation also.
Hope you don't mind me asking but a 7DII & a 135 L lens why do you want to use a monopod? That gear isn't heavy and you should bee able to shoot all day with that setup and not have a problem. I shoot a 7DII with the 100-400 f/4 L lens and cover semi-pro football games with no problem. I did start using a monopod but it was a pain in the butt. I tried it with and without a ball head and I now prefer shooting with out the use of a monopod. If I cover two games in one day by the end of the 2nd. game I can feel it in my arms a little. Once a did a three game series and by the end of the last game I have had it. Had the camera hanging in the sling after almost every shot, guess I'm not as young (71) as I use too be. Maybe I should go try the monopod again? You think?
I think, lol.
There are ball heads with friction control so that it doesn't flop over.
Guess it's back to the drawing board.... I'll give them a look.
kenArchi wrote:
I think, lol.
There are ball heads with friction control so that it doesn't flop over.
Maybe to go vertical a little easier. Otherwise, it's like having a knee added to your neck.
brooklyn-camera I wrote:
Hope you don't mind me asking but a 7DII & a 135 L lens why do you want to use a monopod? That gear isn't heavy and you should bee able to shoot all day with that setup and not have a problem. I shoot a 7DII with the 100-400 f/4 L lens and cover semi-pro football games with no problem. I did start using a monopod but it was a pain in the butt. I tried it with and without a ball head and I now prefer shooting with out the use of a monopod. If I cover two games in one day by the end of the 2nd. game I can feel it in my arms a little. Once a did a three game series and by the end of the last game I have had it. Had the camera hanging in the sling after almost every shot, guess I'm not as young (71) as I use too be. Maybe I should go try the monopod again? You think?
Hope you don't mind me asking but a 7DII & a 1... (
show quote)
If I was shooting in good light I would not use a monopod. This event will be in lousy lighting and decent shutter speeds will be a challenge. The last time I shot an event in this kind of lightning was an indoor horse jumping competition. I was using my 7D and 70-200 f4 hand held. Most of the pictures came out soft. This time I decided to try a monopod for a little extra stability in hopes of improving my "keeper" rate. If this were an outdoor event with good lighting I would not even consider a monopod.
I actually bought a light weight ball head for my monopod. I like it. But it tightens down so that it is quite secure. I have to work at it to move it, so it doesn't flop on me. I use it for my long lenses. And it serves as a place to put my hand when the monopod becomes a walking stick.
splatbass wrote:
I use a tilt head. Easier to control, and the horizontal movement can be done just by turning the monopod.
You have a good point!...Julian
Yes! Always use a ball or tilt head of your choice. Once you position the monopod for maximum stability, without a tilting head, in certain circumstances, it can be awkward, difficult, or impossible to comfortably access the viewfinder and maintain your exact framing and composition.
I shoud have posted this earlier. Here's a shot of my compact ball head that is always atop my monopod. It enables one-haded operation of the tilting and locking mechanism via that trigger-like grip. The other hand,of course, supports the monopod. The camera attached via a quick-release plate and shoe with a very positive locking mechanism. There is a tension adjustment that is conveniently located on the body of the head. Tilting is accomplished very quickly and efficiently- no fumbling, no muss no fuss!
This is a very old Manfrotto product but there is an updated version currently available.
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
I shoud have posted this earlier. Here's a shot of my compact ball head that is always atop my monopod. It enables one-haded operation of the tilting and locking mechanism via that trigger-like grip. The other hand,of course, supports the monopod. The camera attached via a quick-release plate and shoe with a very positive locking mechanism. There is a tension adjustment that is conveniently located on the body of the head. Tilting is accomplished very quickly and efficiently- no fumbling, no muss no fuss!
This is a very old Manfrotto product but there is an updated version currently available.
I shoud have posted this earlier. Here's a shot of... (
show quote)
Yes, I have used this - even with a 300 2.8 ! ....not ideal with that big of a lens - but worked for me !! Today I use a video fluid head which is better for tracking action.
.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
Basil wrote:
I will be using a monopod at an indoor rodeo this weekend. I will probably be using a 7D2 with a 135 f2L lens (no lens foot in other words).
Should I just mount the camera straight to the monopod or is there any reason to use a ball head?
Just make sure that if you use a tilt head, it allows for rotating the swivel 90ยบ or some other arrangement (stacking, square-four sided plate, etc) so that you can either use it with a collared lens or on the camera. Many tilt heads only allow up and down tilt when used with a tripod collar that is oriented in-line with the lens, and would not work without some modification or additional gear when attached to the camera, where the lens plates or L-Brackets are oriented at right angles to the typical tilt direction.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.