Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Newer, but not newest superzoom
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 30, 2017 20:00:17   #
Gregger Loc: Phoenix area
 
ppage wrote:
Good for you. Not so easy with a moving target. The sensor is doing that? You think?


Thanks for those photos. Have they been edited? I don't know much about editing so haven't got involved with it other than to use iPhoto for removing a small piece of papers or other pieces of junk I didn't see. If you did edit, what program did you use. My wife has frames when she can alternate 8x10 pictures I have taken. Very simplistic and serene photos of landscape, flowers, etc. I did get a beautiful photo of a Road Runner sitting on our six foot block wall. I am really proud of it for they are so difficult to catch. Appreciate you replying.

Reply
Aug 30, 2017 20:22:27   #
Gregger Loc: Phoenix area
 
rehess wrote:
There are two ways of measuring a sensor - by pixels or by millimeters.

A "FF" sensor is approximately 36mm x 24mm
An APS-C sensor is roughly 24mm x 16mm

For historical reasons, the very small sensors are measured by diagonal of the sensor. In order to get superzoom that acts like a very long 35mm lens, physics points us to very small sensors; in this case they tend to use the very smallest, the so-called 1/2.3" sensor, which is approximately 6.2mmx4.6mm, less than 1/3-rd the linear dimensions of an APS-C sensor in each direction.

Undisputed is the fact that a larger sensor will naturally provide lower noise and greater color depth.
Sometimes you will see heated discussions here discussing the relative merits of FF and APS-C cameras; the ratio of FF to APS-C is 1.5; the ration of super-zoom to APS-C is twice that, so anything said about comparing FF to APS-C, especially in poor light, is even more true when comparing super-zoom to the larger sensors.
There are two ways of measuring a sensor - by pixe... (show quote)


First of all thank you for this information. If you were in my position and wanted to purchase a Superzoom what would you select? Since they all have the same size sensor shouldn't the Image Quality all come out the same. When it comes to superzoom, I don't need something that will zoom to the moon. I take most of my photos around the neighborhood and from my backyard of birds. I don't want the heaviness of a DSLR nor expense. I am in my 70's and getting up to where I just can't carry lenses very far. I do like the Nikon P900, but don't like the bulkiness of it. Sony has a couple of cameras with 1" sensors. Will this create better Image quality? To be candid, I enjoy photography, but do not understand the physics of photography. Greg

Reply
Aug 31, 2017 02:14:10   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Gregger wrote:
First of all thank you for this information. If you were in my position and wanted to purchase a Superzoom what would you select? Since they all have the same size sensor shouldn't the Image Quality all come out the same. When it comes to superzoom, I don't need something that will zoom to the moon. I take most of my photos around the neighborhood and from my backyard of birds. I don't want the heaviness of a DSLR nor expense. I am in my 70's and getting up to where I just can't carry lenses very far. I do like the Nikon P900, but don't like the bulkiness of it. Sony has a couple of cameras with 1" sensors. Will this create better Image quality? To be candid, I enjoy photography, but do not understand the physics of photography. Greg
First of all thank you for this information. If y... (show quote)

The Nikon shoots JPEG and zooms to 2000mm equivalent. The Canon SX60 can shoot Raw and JPEG, but only zooms to 1365mm equivalent. The Canon is ½ pound lighter than the Nikon. I would love to see the Nikon updated to shoot Raw. Even as a Nikon shooter, I would still choose the Canon.

Reply
 
 
Aug 31, 2017 20:31:31   #
BrentHarder Loc: Southern California
 
Nice! I bet you LOVE that lens!

Reply
Aug 31, 2017 21:11:24   #
Gregger Loc: Phoenix area
 
BHC wrote:
Canon has a refurbished SX60 for $380. Yes this camera is a bit long in the tooth, but is still a great camera and shoots Raw. You can find it for less, but remember, this is a factory refurbished camera from the US distributor, with a one year warranty.

https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/powershot-sx60-hs-refurbished


Well I did it! I got a Nikon Coolpix B700. I don't need the zoom the P900 has and I like the fact that I can look at the screen go the view finder and turns on. I also read an recent article which placed this camera the best out of all the super zooms. Which included the P900. I got an open box from B&H. So I hope I will be happy with it. If someone has a negative remarks, don't tell me about them. ha! Thanks for all of your help. Oh, it is also lighter and not as bulky. I will be able to put it in my Think bag with my Pen EP-5. I ordered the larger Think bag and they shipped me the smaller. I called to tell them about the error. I was told to keep the smaller one and they would send me the larger. Now that is how a company should work. No frustration A-tal. If you don't have a carrying case I would suggest them. They are fantastic.

Reply
Sep 1, 2017 11:18:16   #
bdouglas
 
I hope you like the B700. I found that it focused at full zoom faster and better than the P900 or the Canon SX60. It also has RAW capability, not that I know how to take advantage of that. Good luck.

Reply
Sep 1, 2017 14:15:46   #
Gregger Loc: Phoenix area
 
I sure hope I do too. I got it "open box" from B&H. I have to get a San Disk. They charged me no shipping or taxes. $401.95 was the total. They even expedited the shipping. It's a long way from NY to Phoenix area. I want to thank all of you for your input. Gregger

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2017 14:22:46   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Gregger wrote:
First of all thank you for this information. If you were in my position and wanted to purchase a Superzoom what would you select? Since they all have the same size sensor shouldn't the Image Quality all come out the same. When it comes to superzoom, I don't need something that will zoom to the moon. I take most of my photos around the neighborhood and from my backyard of birds. I don't want the heaviness of a DSLR nor expense. I am in my 70's and getting up to where I just can't carry lenses very far. I do like the Nikon P900, but don't like the bulkiness of it. Sony has a couple of cameras with 1" sensors. Will this create better Image quality? To be candid, I enjoy photography, but do not understand the physics of photography. Greg
First of all thank you for this information. If y... (show quote)

Since you have made your purchase, I apologize for this late response - I was having trouble figuring out a reasonable response, but I'm guessing this won't be your last purchase. Most of us don't understand the physics of photography. We know certain rules and thumb, such as larger sensors tend to give better images than smaller ones do, and we know how to read specs. The last time I made a major change in cameras - gosh, that was nearly three years ago - I made myself a spreadsheet of issues I recognized as being important to me, and used it to organize what I needed to know about each candidate. Eventually I reached conclusions.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.