advocate1982 wrote:
You missed his entire thesis. Give away the photography to the brides, charge the second shooters for the privilege of working for him. So while the bride is getting it for free - he is still making money from the second shooters that are willing to pay for the experience. A real life workshop so to speak.
To be clear, personally, I think this is one of the stupidest ideas I have seen come down the pike, and the fact that there are so many here that think it is a reasonable proposition, says a ton about the lack of professionalism that exists in the industry.
You missed his entire thesis. b Give away the pho... (
show quote)
No, I didn't miss it. I just think it's an absolutely terrible idea... the sort of thing that's largely ruined much of the business of professional photography.
I think a mentorship approach is fine. It's what I recommended and have even done some myself (though not wedding work).
It's the idea of giving away the photography that's really bad (or doing it too cheaply). I also don't like marketing one's work on Craigslist. I think that's just asking for trouble.
Truly mentoring someone should include helping them become business savvy... and if they ain't makin' a profit, they won't be in business very long! The vast majority of photography businesses will fail... and I'd wager that most of the time it's because of too much emphasis on photography, too little on the business side of the equation. Contracts, model releases, licenses, insurance, taxes and everything else.... All have to be done well and properly, long before the first photograph can be taken. If not making this aspect of the work really clear to "wannabes"... I'd feel I was doing them a real disservice.
Giving a client 2500 images seems very excessive, too. I sometimes shoot as many as 5000 images in a day and have led seminars at multi-day events with a number of second shooter/students, ending up with over 20,000 images. Even just eliminating duplicates and accidental shots of one's toes, would probably cut that number in half!
A big part of good editing is knowing what to keep and what to throw out! I would never present a bride with more than 200 or 300... maybe 400 to 500 proofs max... only the best work from the day, after rapid editing, straightening and tweaking. There is such a thing as "too much". That was brought home to me by an event organizer who fired a photographer for taking too many images (9000+... clearly "pray and spray") and posting them all online with little or no editing or sorting, forcing the organizer's customers... the event participants... to do all their own sorting and editing.
I took 3500 images at an event last Sunday. So far I've sorted, edited and uploaded 999 of them to 16 different galleries online (one for each different individual who participated in the event).... and I may add a couple or a few hundred more. About 1/3 to 1/2 is what I average keeping and showing to customers, after culling the good from the bad, eliminating dupes, closed eyes, weird expressions... and the few inevitable photographer errors.