Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Telephoto Zoom Advice for Nikon
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jul 24, 2017 08:22:13   #
bobgreen Loc: Maryland
 
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing several questions including one about the purchase of a Nikon 70-300 FX zoom for my d7100. Several of you questioned the quality of the lens and suggested a 70-200 zoom. I"ve done a little research and see there are a number of offerings from Nikon, Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina with minimum apertures of 2.8 or 4.0. Some with and without VR. The long range plan is to purchase a 300 or higher lens at some poiint. My budget dictates a used lens. The newer Nikon zooms are way over the budget. I'll use this lens almost exclusively outside. Suggestions please before I go crazy with all the choices?

Reply
Jul 24, 2017 08:27:18   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Shop for EX or EX+ rated used items at KEH.com

Reply
Jul 24, 2017 08:40:02   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
If the 70-300 FX VR lens is what you had in mind I simply cannot understand how someone, familiar with this lens, could question its optical quality.
This particular lens is sharp, light and convenient as a tele zoom. I have seen reports of its "softness" at 300mm but that has not been my experience. I have several prints from this lens and the quality is there.
The 70-200 VR seems as an exceptional lens if you do not need more than 200mm. I use an old 80-400 VR that has covered nicely my wildlife shots.
A prime 300mm is perhaps what you need.

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Jul 24, 2017 08:41:21   #
Bullfrog Bill Loc: CT
 
Go with a used Nikon 70-200 f4 VR. Lighter and less costly than the f2.8 (which I have) but still professional quality. The 200 on a crop sensor is plenty of reach for most things. Perhaps a 1.4 tel extender at some point.

Reply
Jul 24, 2017 08:42:21   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
bobgreen wrote:
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing several questions including one about the purchase of a Nikon 70-300 FX zoom for my d7100. Several of you questioned the quality of the lens and suggested a 70-200 zoom. I"ve done a little research and see there are a number of offerings from Nikon, Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina with minimum apertures of 2.8 or 4.0. Some with and without VR. The long range plan is to purchase a 300 or higher lens at some poiint. My budget dictates a used lens. The newer Nikon zooms are way over the budget. I'll use this lens almost exclusively outside. Suggestions please before I go crazy with all the choices?
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing ... (show quote)


Take a look at the new Tamron 18-400mm lens. All the range you could ask for, sharp, and only $649.

Reply
Jul 24, 2017 09:12:05   #
jackpinoh Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
 
bobgreen wrote:
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing several questions including one about the purchase of a Nikon 70-300 FX zoom for my d7100. Several of you questioned the quality of the lens and suggested a 70-200 zoom. I"ve done a little research and see there are a number of offerings from Nikon, Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina with minimum apertures of 2.8 or 4.0. Some with and without VR. The long range plan is to purchase a 300 or higher lens at some poiint. My budget dictates a used lens. The newer Nikon zooms are way over the budget. I'll use this lens almost exclusively outside. Suggestions please before I go crazy with all the choices?
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing ... (show quote)

I have a 300mm lens on a 1.5 crop sensor camera like the D7100. If you are planning to use this lens to photograph animals and birds (it is NOT a landscape lens), you will be very disappointed. The field of view is too wide for wildlife. Renting one for a day or even testing one on your camera in the store will confirm this. Save your money for a used 150-600mm lens or stick to family, landscape, and street photography.

Reply
Jul 25, 2017 05:49:02   #
cthahn
 
I would assume you are going to use a 70-300 outside.

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jul 25, 2017 06:16:48   #
CO
 
I have the Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 AF-S VR lens. It's remarkable what Nikon was able to do considering it's only $497. It cost more when I purchased it. They recently introduced the 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E AF-P lens. It has an electronically controlled aperture and a stepping motor.

Reply
Jul 25, 2017 06:44:52   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
bobgreen wrote:
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing several questions including one about the purchase of a Nikon 70-300 FX zoom for my d7100. Several of you questioned the quality of the lens and suggested a 70-200 zoom. I"ve done a little research and see there are a number of offerings from Nikon, Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina with minimum apertures of 2.8 or 4.0. Some with and without VR. The long range plan is to purchase a 300 or higher lens at some poiint. My budget dictates a used lens. The newer Nikon zooms are way over the budget. I'll use this lens almost exclusively outside. Suggestions please before I go crazy with all the choices?
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing ... (show quote)


First of all, the new "replacement" version of the Nikon 70-300 is reputed to be much better than the older one, which was little more than a "kit" lens. Personally, I have the older version of the 80-300mm lens (a full frame) and it is heads and shoulders better than the DX (crop sensor) version of the old 70-300. Yes I have both and the 70-300 has become my "wife's lens" and is in her bag along with her 18-70mm lens. Both are serviceable but there are better (and more expensive) Nikkor lenses available. My 80-400 has been surpassed but not replaced by a newer. faster focusing and "better" version that has a "SWM" silent wave motor built-in. But, it also costs $1000 more, especially if you get the older one used as I did.

Reply
Jul 25, 2017 07:09:11   #
whitewolfowner
 
I would look for a used Tamron, first version 150-600mm lens. They are available since the second generation came out. If you can afford it, get the second generation, if budget is tight, get a used first generation. I'm sure oyu can get for a little more than a new good quality 70-300mm and you will be happy to have the range on the 150-600mm lens.

Reply
Jul 25, 2017 07:24:08   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
This shot was taken with the Nikon 70-300mm FX lens on a D7000 camera hand held with deer at about 50 yards shot at 300mm. Though I don't have the camera anymore I still keep this lens as it is one of Nikon hidden gem in lenses (low cost and extremely effective even on my D810 FF or D500 DX).

bobgreen wrote:
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing several questions including one about the purchase of a Nikon 70-300 FX zoom for my d7100. Several of you questioned the quality of the lens and suggested a 70-200 zoom. I"ve done a little research and see there are a number of offerings from Nikon, Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina with minimum apertures of 2.8 or 4.0. Some with and without VR. The long range plan is to purchase a 300 or higher lens at some poiint. My budget dictates a used lens. The newer Nikon zooms are way over the budget. I'll use this lens almost exclusively outside. Suggestions please before I go crazy with all the choices?
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing ... (show quote)


(Download)

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Jul 25, 2017 07:35:19   #
Fotomacher Loc: Toronto
 
I have been very happy with Nikkor my AF 80~200 f/2.8D and AFS 300 f/4D ED-IF with/without TC17II. I have not been in any situations that the kit failed me. The lenses are sharp and the images have enough detail to crop in if necessary. I bought all used in an near new condition.

Reply
Jul 25, 2017 09:07:23   #
Archboo3 Loc: Central Florida
 
I am using a Sigma 120-300 2.8. I use it for sports and wildlife. The one I have is the Pro sports version. You can also purchase a computer dock for it. The dock let's you program the lens for your specific camera. I am very Happy with my. I have had it for over a year now, and once I got use to handling the larger lens, it's been great. you must use at least a Monopod with it.

Reply
Jul 25, 2017 09:26:18   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
bobgreen wrote:
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing several questions including one about the purchase of a Nikon 70-300 FX zoom for my d7100. Several of you questioned the quality of the lens and suggested a 70-200 zoom. I"ve done a little research and see there are a number of offerings from Nikon, Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina with minimum apertures of 2.8 or 4.0. Some with and without VR. The long range plan is to purchase a 300 or higher lens at some poiint. My budget dictates a used lens. The newer Nikon zooms are way over the budget. I'll use this lens almost exclusively outside. Suggestions please before I go crazy with all the choices?
Over the weekend, I posted an inquiry containing ... (show quote)


https://fstoppers.com/originals/tamron-vs-nikon-which-70-200mm-f28-telephoto-lens-best-money-171839
http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/roundup/lens-roundup/best-70-200mm-tele-zoom-lenses-64789
https://petapixel.com/2015/03/28/just-the-lenses-the-great-200mm-shoot-out/

Reply
Jul 25, 2017 11:22:20   #
llawryf
 
I did a bit of research, and bought a refurbished Nikon 70-300 f4.5 -5.6 VR II IF-ED for my Nikon 7100. I think it is an awesome lens. Compact and lightweight. I use it for handheld bird photos.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.