Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Sigma 105mm f2.8
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jul 23, 2017 11:58:26   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
augieg27 wrote:
Thank you all for your input. I appreciate it.
BTW, what IMHO stands for?


IMHO= In My Humble Opinion.
Or ...Honest?

Reply
Jul 23, 2017 12:50:43   #
augieg27 Loc: Central California
 
Thanks.

Reply
Jul 23, 2017 15:50:52   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
augieg27 wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with the Sigma 105mm f2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro?
I want to get into macro photography and wonder if any of you have used this lens or if there is other better alternatives.
I use a Nikon D3300 - Nikon 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 and Nikon 50mm f1.8 primarily for landscapes and some portraits.
Thanks.

You owe it to yourself to at least take a look at the new Tamron 90mm macro, it's getting very good reviews and is about the same price as the Sigma.

Reply
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jul 23, 2017 17:29:24   #
augieg27 Loc: Central California
 
Thank you. I'll look into it. I need one lens with AF motor since my D3300 does not have one.

Reply
Jul 23, 2017 18:24:41   #
Bill Paustian Loc: Sun City, Az
 
in my humble opinion

Reply
Jul 23, 2017 19:24:16   #
PAR4DCR Loc: A Sunny Place
 
Have you tried searching for a refurbished or used Nikkor 105 2.8? Might just fall into your price range.

Don

Reply
Jul 23, 2017 19:48:25   #
Machinedoc Loc: Yorktown Heights, NY
 
IMHO = In my humble opinion - let us know if you buy the lens, and if so, how you like it. Enjoy!

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jul 23, 2017 19:59:47   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
I have the Nikkor 105 VRG. If I was buying today, it would be the Sigma. The AF limiter choices would be one of the "deciders" for me: three options on the Sigma and two on the Nikkor. The option omitted by Nikkor is the most critical for Macro.

Reply
Jul 23, 2017 23:30:27   #
RonM12 Loc: Washington State
 
I'd opt for the Tokina 100 f/2.8 macro. It's on sale at B&H $349 with the rebate. I'm a Nikon user and traditionally stay with Nikkor lens. But the reviews on the Tokina are very good, it's rated better than the Nikon 105mm and significantly less expensive. Check out the reviews, it will be my next purchase.

Reply
Jul 24, 2017 01:27:44   #
augieg27 Loc: Central California
 
Some of the given choices don't have AF which I need because my D3300 does not have autofocus motor.

Reply
Jul 24, 2017 04:34:43   #
Modnar Loc: Batley' West Yorkshire, UK
 
I use mine with the Sigma 1.4 Extender. It extends the foal length to 147mm which is excellent for insect shots or items which are relatively inaccessible. Go for it.

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Jul 24, 2017 16:37:08   #
art pear Loc: North Dakota
 
I have the Nikon version and the Tokina version of that lens for my d7000 and d800. Get the Tokina.

Reply
Jul 24, 2017 17:35:52   #
wolvesaywe Loc: Hants England
 
I use the Tokina 100mm ATX PRO on my D7200 , a fantastic lens .

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.