Sensor Size Comparison
Jul 18, 2017 12:50:33 #
Cdouthitt wrote:
It's ok that you have to compensate for your deficiencies...but personally I wouldn't advertise.
Of course you could not advertise it.....you are a small handed, weak, little man. No defficiencies little man. I want the best IQ possible and can hold a FF camera.
Lets see your toy camera and little lenses get an image better than this one, for example:(click on it!)
269A1036 by Oscar Baez Soria, on FlickrOr this one...(click on it!)
269A4368 by Oscar Baez Soria, on FlickrI like the best possible detailed images I can get......your small camera is not up to the task. But of course with your little hands you could not even hold that setup for 1 second! LOL! And stop been so obsessed with my ass....its uncomfortable.
Jul 18, 2017 12:57:47 #
Those are fine images...I think I've seen samples like that from an SX50 before.
Jul 18, 2017 13:00:39 #
Cdouthitt wrote:
Those are fine images...I think I've seen samples like that from an SX50 before.
Doubt it, little man. Let see your images. You say DSLRs drool.....prove it. I think the only one drooling....is you.
Jul 18, 2017 13:06:19 #
chaman wrote:
Doubt it, little man. Let see your images. You say DSLRs drool.....prove it. I think the only one drooling....is you.
First time I've ever been called little...if anything I could stand to loose a few pounds.
Jul 18, 2017 13:07:31 #
Cdouthitt wrote:
First time I've ever been called little...if anything I could stand to loose a few pounds.
Your images? DSLRs are drooling, right? Lets see them....
Jul 18, 2017 13:08:14 #
chaman wrote:
Your images? DSLRs are drooling, right? Lets see them....
Do a search...there's plenty of examples.
Jul 18, 2017 13:11:36 #
Cdouthitt wrote:
Do a search...there's plenty of examples.
I did. Put them here. Do they make DSLRs drool? Lets see, because for what Ive seen from you, you should be ashamed of that idiotic signature, Captain Small Hands. Do any of yours compare, have the same resolution, clarity and detail? Should my DSLR drool?
Jul 18, 2017 13:22:34 #
chaman wrote:
I did. Put them here. Do they make DSLRs drool? Lets see, because for what Ive seen from you, you should be ashamed of that idiotic signature, Captain Small Hands. Do any of yours compare, have the same resolution, clarity and detail? Should my DSLR drool?
All fixed...Is that better...I think so.
Jul 18, 2017 13:32:38 #
Cdouthitt wrote:
All fixed...Is that better...I think so.
Still obsessed with another man ass? Well, okay.....if that is YOUR thing.
Its obvious you have NOTHING to show. Thanks for trying to play though.
Jul 18, 2017 13:48:49 #
rehess wrote:
The others seem to be too busy playing childish games to focus on your question. The simple answer is that sharpness depends on total pixels {along with all the usual things, such as lens and camera settings}. However, small sensor pixels will tend to have other issues, especially under less-than-ideal-conditions, issues such as lowered dynamic range and increased noise.
So under ideal conditions, what would be the difference between a FF 18 mp and a crop frame 18 mp. Would both be able to be printed to the same size with the same results? I understand shadow detail is better because the bigger pixels have more info. so to speak and the FF would have a more sensitive sensor for lower light, but would sharpness be the same? Oh and thanks for answering my question. I'm having a problem wrapping my head around the sensor size/megapixel relationship and print output.
Jul 18, 2017 13:49:38 #
Dutzie
Loc: I'd like to know
CatMarley wrote:
Image quality depends on sooo much more than the size of the sensor!
I like your way of thinking...
Jul 18, 2017 13:53:42 #
speakdolphin wrote:
Ferrari versus Maserati.....it really comes down to the driver. I have taken extraordinary photos with really small, inexpensive cameras as well as really bad photos with the most expensive cameras.
I've had some very great shots from an point and shoot, until I tried to print out to an 8x10.
Jul 18, 2017 14:03:40 #
wmurnahan wrote:
So under ideal conditions, what would be the diffe... (show quote)
No. The larger the sensor, the bigger it prints and better results.
Jul 18, 2017 14:08:31 #
Dutzie wrote:
I like your way of thinking...
Provide examples of smaller sensor giving better images than a larger one.....since you like such an absurd way of thinking....
Jul 18, 2017 14:09:01 #
amfoto1
Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
aellman wrote:
Indeed, size does matter.....
Yes, certainly SIZE MATTERS...
.... Such as the SIZE you view the image on your computer screen during post-processing.
... Or, the SIZE you'll be printing or using the image in other ways.
... And, the SIZE of your wallet.
... As well as the the SIZE and weight of lens kit you're willing to haul around.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.