Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens Lifespan
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 7, 2017 07:15:01   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
GENorkus wrote:
'just wondering:

I've worn out a few camera shutters in my past but never a lens and I not heard of this happening either. Yes I heard several times about breakage but not just normal wearing out and I'm talking about in my 55 plus years of photographing.

I don't often get a chance to use Canon or Nikon with their in lens stab system so that might electronically go bad. Once I dropped a lens into a river so if it ever gets found again, it might be bad, but otherwise my Pentax lenses just keep on working!

Has anyone ever worn out a lens?
'just wondering: br br I've worn out a few camera... (show quote)


I've heard about the leaves sticking, but that's repairable, although it would be expensive. As you say, electronics do go bad. LensRental had an article about that, and focusing motors do fail. I've never experienced any kind of lens failure.

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 07:58:50   #
TomV Loc: Annapolis, Maryland
 
Up to this post, no one has experienced lens failures but yet there is a bevy of hoggers that claim you should not buy grey market since you will not have the US warranty. This is not consistent reasoning since clearly the warranty is rarely used. In my brief experience I have never had a lens failure and most are purchased used.

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 08:03:58   #
Robert Bailey Loc: Canada
 
I've been a photographer for 42 years and have had only one lens fail in that time. It was repaired under warranty.
I have unfortunately had problems with mildew growing inside lenses when they were stored in an area with too high humidity.

Reply
 
 
Jun 7, 2017 08:06:19   #
DavidJon Loc: Ada, Oklahoma
 
Too true. My 40 and 50 year old Nikkors, Takumars and Rokkors still work as well as the day they came off the dealer's shelf. How long my motorized, auto-focus, electronic lenses for my DSLRs will last I have no idea but in 40 years I expect they will be little more than objects of curiosity.
billnikon wrote:
Life span for older manual focus metal Nikon, Canon, Minolta lenses, 100's of years. Life span of newer auto focus, full of electronics, Nikon, Canon, Sony lenses, 100's of months?

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 08:10:38   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
Disuse is bad for manual lenses. Use is bad for automatic lenses.

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 08:12:44   #
Robert Bailey Loc: Canada
 
RWR wrote: "Disuse is bad for manual lenses. Use is bad for automatic lenses."

A wise statement, my friend!

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 08:20:06   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Not me.

Reply
 
 
Jun 7, 2017 08:21:41   #
Robert Bailey Loc: Canada
 
Not you what?

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 08:25:43   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
marki3rd wrote:
In case anyone doesn't know, the Auto Designation on Pentax Takumar and many other old lenses refers to the fact that when set to "A" or "Auto" the aperture remains full open for focusing and in some cases for exposure readout. These lenses then "Automatically" stop down to the f-stop set on the aperture control ring when the shutter is tripped. It accomplishes this feat with a pin that gets pressed in or with a lever that gets moved. Sooo, you see, these lenses are not "auto nothing". They are "auto aperture".
In case anyone doesn't know, the Auto Designation ... (show quote)


The Auto-Takumar lens(es) that I am (was) talking about are earlier and physically smaller than the standard Pentax 49mm filter size. My Auto-Takumar 35mm f/3.5 lens has a lever on the side to manually stop-down the iris. You are correct in that Takumar lenses had auto aperture. But the pre-Spotmatic, pre-Super Multicoated Takumar lenses are different from that. On the later Multicoated-Takumar and Super-Multicoated-Takumar lenses the auto (open/close) iris switch is freely reset-able when used on both Screw Mount (M42) or K-mount cameras. Where as when I've put a Auto-Takumar on a K-mount camera if you "throw" the switch you can not reset it with out first removing the lens and by hand pushing the Pin in. The K-cameras lack the linkage and must use the screw mount lenses fully manually (but yes you can open and close the iris manually for focusing and checking DoF), but the old Auto-Takumars are in essence reversed as to the switch lever and Pin when and how the iris is open or stopped down on a none Screw Mount body. I have never handled a per Spotmatic Pentax so I'm not sure of its precise actions. Meaning the Auto-Takumar lenses made sense on the pre-K-mount cameras. So in my original post I said "auto nothing" to mean the auto-Takumar lens is a pain in the ass on a DSLR because if you bump the switch you have to dismount the lens to reset it -- I was being sarcastic at my own lens.* I actually own both types of Takumar lenses so I'm not talking hypothetically. See attached photo of both types of lenses. The rears look similar both with M42 threads. (I believe even earlier "Pentax" lenses were M39)

*I purchased the lens for potential IR & UV use because I believe it has less coating than the later models. The IR images I get with it are certainly different but it remains to be seen if it is an improvement. My other Takumar lenses work fine manually on both my K-mount SLR and DSLR cameras.

The Linkage Inside Is Different Too
The Linkage Inside Is Different Too...
(Download)

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 08:46:28   #
dreamon
 
I've been shooting seriously since 1975, and I've never suffered a lens failure, not even oily diaphragms. Knock on wood.

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 09:22:05   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
dreamon wrote:
I've been shooting seriously since 1975, and I've never suffered a lens failure, not even oily diaphragms. Knock on wood.




Normally you only get oily diaphragms (blades, leaves) if some previous fool oiled instead of cleaning them.

Reply
 
 
Jun 7, 2017 09:30:00   #
dreamon
 
Agreed. Graphite should be the weapon of choice.

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 10:24:02   #
CPR Loc: Nature Coast of Florida
 
This one is roughly 70 years old and still going fine. Have Nikon lenses from the 50's that still work as well. Not so for me but the lenses are doing fine.



Reply
Jun 7, 2017 12:47:09   #
Robert Bailey Loc: Canada
 
Have you looked at buying a digital back for your 4 x 5 cameras?

Reply
Jun 7, 2017 13:12:39   #
Kissel vonKeister Loc: Georgia
 
dreamon wrote:
Agreed. Graphite should be the weapon of choice.


According to Ken Wheeler who dismantles lenses to investigate and repair them, the diaphragm and shutter blades are now largely Kevlar with no lube required.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.