I've posted several questions and added a fair number of comments to other Photography topic comments but this is my first under general chit chat. There have been a few strings bemoaning how rock 'n roll hasn't really come up with anything new for the past several decades. I'm in complete agreement with that assertion but maybe that's not always bad a thing. Here's an incredible version of Simon & Garfunkel's "Sounds of Silence" done by no other than a current heavy metal band. I have to admit, while Heavy Metal isn't to my taste, that music form has some incredible talent both in vocals and guitarmanship. Here's "Disturbed" doing the great '60's song that's as relevant today as it was almost 50 years ago.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=disturbed+sound+of+silence&&view=detail&mid=42C83DCBEED16998B0DC42C83DCBEED16998B0DC&FORM=VRDGAR Hope the link works otherwise, cut and paste.
There are a number of versions on the internet but this one has good fidelity (if you remember the song, you know what that means) and is a good version.
fourlocks wrote:
I've posted several questions and added a fair number of comments to other Photography topic comments but this is my first under general chit chat. There have been a few strings bemoaning how rock 'n roll hasn't really come up with anything new for the past several decades. I'm in complete agreement with that assertion but maybe that's not always bad a thing. Here's an incredible version of Simon & Garfunkel's "Sounds of Silence" done by no other than a current heavy metal band. I have to admit, while Heavy Metal isn't to my taste, that music form has some incredible talent both in vocals and guitarmanship. Here's "Disturbed" doing the great '60's song that's as relevant today as it was almost 50 years ago.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=disturbed+sound+of+silence&&view=detail&mid=42C83DCBEED16998B0DC42C83DCBEED16998B0DC&FORM=VRDGAR Hope the link works otherwise, cut and paste.
There are a number of versions on the internet but this one has good fidelity (if you remember the song, you know what that means) and is a good version.
I've posted several questions and added a fair num... (
show quote)
Thanks, I do agree, but that same song (done by Disturbed) was being posted here on the forum just about a month ago or something like that!
After listening to this version I went back and listened to Simon and Garfunkel. No comparison.
speters wrote:
Thanks, I do agree, but that same song (done by Disturbed) was being posted here on the forum just about a month ago or something like that!
Sorry folks; I didn't realize this was old news.
I DO NOT LIKE heavy metal. However, Disturbed, is different in a strange way. I have always like Simon and Garfunkel's Sound of Silence. This puts a little different twist to it. I'll have to look for more od Disturbed music and see if it all runs like this.l
Thanks for the post Excellent find
I do like the Disturbed version of this song, however, the 'Official Video' version is far better than this live cut. Check that one out before you pass judgement.
SteveR wrote:
After listening to this version I went back and listened to Simon and Garfunkel. No comparison.
Something were right the first time around - like some old movies that should not have been remade.
I've never been a big fan of heavy metal. A great song done by a very talented group. Great job!
I love it! Maybe the first version of a song that I like better than the original. I like it a bit better than Disturbed's official version. Thanks for the posting !
If you want to hear a FABULOUS version of this song, check out the attached link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HboNZ8HFF8It's done by Peter Hollens and Tim Foust (the bass singer from Home Free). Strictly acapella and in my opinion very true to the original feel of the song.
I love everything that these guys do.
picsbywayne wrote:
If you want to hear a FABULOUS version of this song, check out the attached link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HboNZ8HFF8It's done by Peter Hollens and Tim Foust (the bass singer from Home Free). Strictly acapella and in my opinion very true to the original feel of the song.
I love everything that these guys do.
Absolutely astonishing! It's a little disturbing to see multiple versions of Peter singing the background "ooooooh ooooohs" but incredibly beautiful harmony. Just goes to show that the song can be sung in any number of different ways and the message still holds up.
That was very good Wayne, but in the future try to remember not to trample on somebody else's post.
picsbywayne wrote:
If you want to hear a FABULOUS version of this song, check out the attached link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HboNZ8HFF8It's done by Peter Hollens and Tim Foust (the bass singer from Home Free). Strictly acapella and in my opinion very true to the original feel of the song.
I love everything that these guys do.
Sorry, but today's musicians can't hold a candle to the ones from the 60's and 70's. I couldn't listen to it past the first few seconds. Their voices did not even harmonize and they couldn't stay together. An insult to Simon and Garfunkel.
Not even close to the original. I agree an insult to Simon and Garfunkel.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.