Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 25, 2017 06:32:22   #
Shoeless_Photographer Loc: Lexington
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
The high ISO is why it's so grainy. The T2i isn't known for having a good high iso sensor. That's the first camera I had and you ought to keep the ISO at or below 400. Sometimes you just need to come back on a better day to take pictures if the light isn't good.


My T3 starts getting really ugly by ISO 800. I try to have it max out at 400 as much as possible, but I usually set it at 100.

Reply
May 25, 2017 09:19:52   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Shoeless_Photographer wrote:
My T3 starts getting really ugly by ISO 800. I try to have it max out at 400 as much as possible, but I usually set it at 100.


Peterff wrote:
I agree with that observation. T2i and T3i have the same sensor I believe. Not much changed sensor wise until the T6i / T6s. Not knocking either camera, they were good for their time, but technology keeps improving, including Canon sensors and lenses.




Reply
May 25, 2017 09:36:05   #
Paul Buckhiester Loc: Columbus, GA USA
 
PHRubin wrote:
I recently purchased this lens and am disappointed. At 300mm the image is soft. Has anyone else experienced this or did I just get a dud?


I meant to include this.


(Download)

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 09:44:17   #
Paul Buckhiester Loc: Columbus, GA USA
 
Oops. I meant to include exif. ISO 3200, F5.6 and 1/160 at 300mm on Canon 70d handheld.

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:29:50   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
I know why it is grainy, what I asked was about sharpness. The last shot was at f8 as opposed to 5.6 (wide open at 300mm).

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:43:42   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
Here is a daylight shot at f8 1/500, ISO 800 ROOTC. ANy thoughts? Better, but I'm undecided.


(Download)

Reply
May 25, 2017 18:05:02   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
PHRubin wrote:
Here is a daylight shot at f/8 1/500, ISO 800 ROOTC. Any thoughts? Better, but I'm undecided.


Can we assume that you don't have a filter on the lens?

Have you tried a shot on a tripod, remote shutter release, mirror locked up?

Things that will reduce any environmental considerations. Given the 1.6 angle of view factor at 300mm this lens equivalent to a 480mm lens from a camera shake / motion perspective. A shutter speed of 1/800 or 1/1000 if hand held might help. However I do understand balancing ISO, shutter speed and aperture with a T2i.

Good luck.

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
May 25, 2017 20:04:02   #
Paul Buckhiester Loc: Columbus, GA USA
 
PHRubin wrote:
Here is a daylight shot at f8 1/500, ISO 800 ROOTC. ANy thoughts? Better, but I'm undecided.


Looks good there

Reply
May 26, 2017 12:10:49   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
Peterff wrote:
Can we assume that you don't have a filter on the lens?

Have you tried a shot on a tripod, remote shutter release, mirror locked up?

Things that will reduce any environmental considerations. Given the 1.6 angle of view factor at 300mm this lens equivalent to a 480mm lens from a camera shake / motion perspective. A shutter speed of 1/800 or 1/1000 if hand held might help. However I do understand balancing ISO, shutter speed and aperture with a T2i.

Good luck.


Yes - I removed the UV filter before these shots. With the lens hood there really is no need for it.
Yes - tripod No - remote shutter release or mirror lockup

Reply
May 26, 2017 12:44:16   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Peterff wrote:
Have you tried a shot on a tripod, remote shutter release, mirror locked up?

By the old rule-of-thumb, he should be able to hand-hold this lens at 1/480 or faster.

I'm no longer a Canon owner, but from the name I understand it is stabilized; surely that should also reduce the need for tripod, remote release, mirror locked, and everyone quiet in the county

Reply
May 26, 2017 15:01:14   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
rehess wrote:
By the old rule-of-thumb, he should be able to hand-hold this lens at 1/480 or faster.

I'm no longer a Canon owner, but from the name I understand it is stabilized; surely that should also reduce the need for tripod, remote release, mirror locked, and everyone quiet in the county


Yes I agree, and I usually do so, but if really wanting to test the lens I thought that removing as many extraneous variables as possible could be useful.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.