Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Reduction in Gear
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
May 11, 2017 08:14:02   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
I should do the same with all my Nikon gear which is in excellent condition. Too heavy at my age. Perhaps the Sony a6500 would be a better choice.
~FiddleMaker


It really helps the "shaky."

Reply
May 11, 2017 08:15:21   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Good for you! Selling locally is a good way to go. I have the A6000, and it's a very capable camera. Gary Fong has an excellent video on the A6000, and his A6300 is probably just as good. I have the Bush book, too, and the eBook by Friedman, but seeing someone explain everything in person is nice, and for $30, you can't go wrong. What lens(s) do you have - or plan to have. I'm using the 16-50mm and 55-210mm, although some people say they are not perfect. : (


IMHO those lenses are very good. The 18-55 kit, not so much

Reply
May 11, 2017 08:17:10   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Peterff wrote:
That's an interesting observation, but is it true?

Electronic circuits and motors aren't very heavy. They add bulk, but not necessarily much weight. Modern materials (strong plastics) reduce weight, the glass doesn't seem to change much, although modern zoom lenses may use more of it.

Personally I find my 'vintage' lenses to be heavier than modern equivalents, but less bulky.

I also suspect that modern optics technology allows for wider aperture lenses which adds to the glass weight.

As with most things it can be complicated.
That's an interesting observation, but is it true?... (show quote)


If I had to bet on it, I would say the glass makes up most of the weight.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2017 08:17:45   #
sr71 Loc: In Col. Juan Seguin Land
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
You can get a metabones smart adapter and use that Nikon glass on your new Sony.


He doesn't own that Nikon glass anymore, he stated that he sold it ALL



enjoy he camera it's a good one....

Reply
May 11, 2017 08:19:40   #
cthahn
 
Good choice.

Reply
May 11, 2017 08:19:59   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
warrior wrote:
The D810 and lenses was getting to heavy for this 86 yr old. Sold all locally. The Sony a6300, is so much lighter .!!!!


Yes. technology marches on. A Glock is considerably lighter and does the identical job as the Colt .44! Just because the 810 is a solid piece of metal does not make it the "best" camera, depending on how one defines the purpose of a camera.

Reply
May 11, 2017 08:39:42   #
caljr Loc: Indiana
 
I had the same problem, the weight was to much for me when I travel so I ordered the new Fuji X-T20 and for the last few days have been reading the book and shooting around the house. This is a nice small well built easy camera to learn and I'm getting great results. I now have 4k video something my nikon did not have.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2017 08:58:28   #
D74M
 
Just purchased Fuji X-T1 w/their 18-135 mm lens from B & H; delivery tomorrow. Would liked to have purchased the X-T2, but a bit too costly. Fuji was offering such a good sale on the X-T1, I couldn't pass it up. The first thing I'll do w/the X-T1 is the most recent firmware upgrade for both the body & lens.

Reply
May 11, 2017 09:07:49   #
Reinaldokool Loc: San Rafael, CA
 
warrior wrote:
The D810 and lenses was getting to heavy for this 86 yr old. Sold all locally. The Sony a6300, is so much lighter .!!!!




Exactly one of the main reasons I went there. Of course there are some others as well. The video is much better, and the burst mode will keep up with small children. Oh, and the autofocus is faster.

Reply
May 11, 2017 09:14:33   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Yes, it is so much lighter. You can appreciate now why so many people prefer mirrorless cameras and I have predicted that most if not all cameras in the near future will be mirrorless.
I like Ken Rockwell but I am not in agreement with everything he says. He has stated that mirrorless cameras do not have good colors and I respectfully disagree. Olympus has excellent colors and I cannot speak of other mirrorless cameras because I have not used them. Ken favors over saturated colors but I am more of a pastel colors man.
Mirrorless has still some disadvantages like not being the best camera there is for sports and wildlife photography but that is rapidly coming to an end. Quality wise enlargements like those I make up to 13x19 seem to my eyes to have the same quality of those coming from a dSLR when using good lenses.
Enjoy your new camera.

Reply
May 11, 2017 10:59:11   #
peterg Loc: Santa Rosa, CA
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
You can get a metabones smart adapter and use that Nikon glass on your new Sony.
True, but autofocus may not work with many lenses.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2017 12:01:36   #
jenny Loc: in hiding:)
 
hrblaine wrote:
I'm 87 and have a Canon 5d, a 40d and a half dozen lens. When I get into my 90s, if my gear is too heavy I'll just give up photography. I can do that because I have a life.

* * * *
Or, as the kids will tell you probably, by then you need a smartPhone

Reply
May 11, 2017 12:32:14   #
delkeener Loc: SW Rhode Island, USA
 
I lightened my load to 9.6 oz. Bought a used Panasonic Lumix LX5: 24-90mm equiv. zoom, f2.0-f3.3. Leica fixed lens plus an add-on LVF (adds less than an ounce). Total cost $150. Only better IMHO is the LX7.

Reply
May 11, 2017 12:57:26   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
I am 82 and never noticed how heavy my Nikon D800 the rest of my rig was until I read it here! Now, I am conscious of it, Thanks A Lot!

Reply
May 11, 2017 13:14:18   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
camerapapi wrote:

I like Ken Rockwell but I am not in agreement with everything he says. He has stated that mirrorless cameras do not have good colors and I respectfully disagree. Olympus has excellent colors and I cannot speak of other mirrorless cameras because I have not used them. Ken favors over saturated colors but I am more of a pastel colors man.


Yes if you look at some of Rockwells stuff it is garish color - quite artificial looking. In fact, the Fujis seem to deliver skin tones much better than any of my Nikons. The Fuji color films did too!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.