Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Digitizing old negatives
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 4, 2017 11:21:05   #
bw79st Loc: New York City
 
scotty54 wrote:
I have scanned numerous slides with an Epson V-500 with good results. However, negatives are a different story. If your film is very flat, it works fine. Some of my film, however, is curled side to side, not lengthwise. Even with anti- Newton ring glass taped into the film holder, I couldn't keep it flat enough for a decent scan. I bought a Plustek 7600i-SE and am very pleased with the results. It may be a bit tedious, as it only scans single, 35mm frames and has no auto-advance, but it scans well, and the ladder-like holders keep film flat. Why Epson doesn't make a better holder is anyone's guess. Good luck with your scanning! Attached scans done with Plustek
I have scanned numerous slides with an Epson V-500... (show quote)


Thanks for the tip. I haven't tried scanning film on my V600 since I also have a Canoscan FS4000US for slides, film and APS. I would suggest getting one of these used if anyone has to scan a lot of film strips. It will do a load of 6 frames of film or 4 slides. This is tedious, especially if you are scanning to DNG files, but you don't need to stand there and watch it work. I can be scanning a load while I'm doing something else on the computer, or while I'm taking a shower, eating a meal, or going to the store. It helps to have a second set of carriers loaded up and ready to go. The DNG files can be manipulated in ACR which is a big advantage if you are making archive copies.

Reply
May 4, 2017 15:00:51   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
Old84 wrote:
After several (read many) years of film photography I have amassed a huge volume of color negatives (mostly Verichrome) for which most of the prints have either been lost or given away. I would like to prevail upon the UHH wisdom and experience for the best way to digitize the best pictures from these negs. I will probably keep only about 20% of these pictures but even so the sheer volume of negatives would most likely make commercial processing cost prohibitive. Is there a device that would allow me to review these negatives and save only those pictures I want to keep?
After several (read many) years of film photograph... (show quote)


I have an Epson flatbed and film scanner which has a carrier for your negatives. Excellent quality. Go to The Epson Store online and check out the models. They are very reasonably priced and sometimes have past year's model on sale. I got my V500 for $105. >Alan

Reply
May 5, 2017 01:36:01   #
bleyton Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
bw79st wrote:
I will assume there are a good portion of family photos in the batch. Whether they have artistic value, or not, is not important. They are documents that future generations would love to see many years from now. If you make the decision to scan these photos it just may be the last time anyone will digitize them and there is always the possibility that someone else will discard your originals in the future. Do the best work you know how to do right from the outset. I have been lucky enough to get a second shot at family photos long after I learned what I really needed to do, so those early 350k sized scans will not be the final word.

Now, I scan prints, slides and negatives as DNG files. I opt for large sized files as I have learned you can see a lot in a good scan of a small print when blown up. (I have a cryptic photo of a deck of a ship with no recognizable family members in it. My large scan enabled me to blow it up and see "Baltic" on a lifeboat, so now I know this was taken by my father when he arrived from Ireland on the Baltic in 1923.)

I also put as much info in the Metadata as I can. I may not be around to explain the circumstances of a photo to a 40 year old grandniece.

The software that comes with a scanner may not offer DNG as an option, but I use Vuescan, which does. Vuescan also offers more facilities for adjusting the scan image. It has the added benefit of working with every scanner and having one learning curve for any scanner you may buy in the future.
I will assume there are a good portion of family p... (show quote)


I agree with you 100%. I did my scans as TIFF using 2400dpi. I tried 3600 (the maximum optical resolution of the scanner) but did not see any difference - except that the scans took much longer. You never really know what you will be able to pull out of a scanned photo. I managed to find the very first picture I ever took of my wife - she was 13, and I was 16. She was way off to the side of a picture that I scanned from a Plus-X negative. The resolution was so nice that I was able to crop out the rest of the photo and still have a very decent shot.

Given the low cost of storage these days, there is very little reason not to scan at the highest resolution that makes sense, and save to a lossless format.

One other point. Many of my color negatives and slides have already faded and color-shifted. You never really know how much longer they will last. Best to produce the best scans you can now, before it's too late.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.