Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens Selection
Apr 18, 2017 22:39:22   #
lpeck
 
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.

Reply
Apr 18, 2017 22:44:44   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.


What do you plan on taking photos of?
ie: birds, you will need more than 300 mm of reach (with birds there is no such thing as too long or even "long enough")
Do you think you might want a FF camera in the future? the 70-300 is an EF lenses for FF

Reply
Apr 18, 2017 23:19:29   #
lpeck
 
i plan to go to Alaska, Australia and Hawaii in the next 2-3 years and would like a variety of lenses to allow me the freedom necessary to take great shots wherever I am. The only lens I have now in my new 80D is the 18-135. I don't have an unlimited budget guy am looking to add 2 additional lenses. Help!!!

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2017 23:35:39   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.

Neither.

Reply
Apr 19, 2017 00:28:26   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
lpeck wrote:
i plan to go to Alaska, Australia and Hawaii in the next 2-3 years and would like a variety of lenses to allow me the freedom necessary to take great shots wherever I am. The only lens I have now in my new 80D is the 18-135. I don't have an unlimited budget guy am looking to add 2 additional lenses. Help!!!

OK, unless you are a wide angle freak the 18-135 should do for landscapes and most close subjects. For long shots with a bit of overlap get a 100-400 mk I (used around 700 or so) and also a fast lens for low light - the 50 mm f/1.8 should do it and is very low priced-$126 new.
With the 80D's crop factor you will have the 29-640 mm Angle Of View covered. Oh, the 100-400 is not tiny or light, but I hand hold one all the time using a $15 pistol grip mounted on the lens' tripod collar. It also works extremely well with Canon's 1.4x extenders which would get you out to an AOV of 896 mm, I use one of those also. But if you get one of the lenses you stated you can use a Kenko 1.4x extender to get more reach. Of the two lenses you named I would say the 70-300 mark II if the extra money doesn't bother you, right now on the Canon store it is $499 vs $449 for the mark I.

Reply
Apr 19, 2017 06:44:12   #
Carlo Loc: Maryland, NW.Chesapeake Bay
 
I shoot with a 70D....and among my lenses I have the 55-250 you mentioned...A wonderful performer...capable of amazing images...and Great value for money spent..you would not be unhappy with this lens...!!

Reply
Apr 19, 2017 06:58:14   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.


Just looking at the numbers, I would get the 55 - 250mm. For me, 70mm would be too tele. My "always" lens is a 28 - 300mm. Of course, what you're shooting will determine what's right for you. Below are some lens comparison links.

http://lensvslens.com/
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/lenses
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx
http://www.diyphotography.net/this-website-helps-you-choose-your-next-lens-based-on-the-photos-you-like/
https://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
http://lenshero.com/lens-comparison
http://www.lenstip.com/lenses.html
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare
http://www.lenscore.org/
http://lenshero.com/comparison/Nikon-AF-S-80-400mm-f4.5-5.6G-ED-VR-vs-Nikon-AF-S-200-500mm-f5.6E-ED-VR

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2017 07:50:20   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.


Of the lenses you mention I would get the new EF 70 - 300. For a second lens the EF-S 10 - 18.

If you can raise the money instead of the 70 - 300 get the new 100 - 400 L.

Since you asked what I would do!

Reply
Apr 19, 2017 11:52:49   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.

Only you can answer that, because only you knows what you want to shoot!!

Reply
Apr 19, 2017 12:37:37   #
rbfanman
 
For wildlife, forget camera lenses altogether. Buy a good telescope, and a T-Mount to fit your camera to it.

Reply
Apr 19, 2017 16:27:22   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
rbfanman wrote:
For wildlife, forget camera lenses altogether. Buy a good telescope, and a T-Mount to fit your camera to it.

Seriously?

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2017 19:51:19   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.


On a budget, this is the lens I would use - http://www.photozone.de/reviews/202-canon-ef-100-300mm-f56-l-test-report--review

Canon 100-300 f5.6 L ( with Fluorite ! )......

Reply
Apr 22, 2017 19:17:40   #
DJphoto Loc: SF Bay Area
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.


I also have an 80D with the EF-S 18-135. I recently bought the EF 70-300 IS II USM, which is the full frame equivalent to a 112-480mm on the 80D. I've already taken something like 3,000 photos with it and am very happy I bought it.

Reply
Apr 28, 2017 18:55:37   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
lpeck wrote:
To be used on an 80D would you purchase a Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM or a 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM I already have the 18-135 IS USM that came with the camera.

That depends! What is one of your main interest in shooting with either one? If it would be mainly for video, I probably opt for the STM lens. other then that, the differences are very small! The USM has a tad more reach (tiny), so it most likely comes down to which kind of focus motor you prefer. I think the speed between the two is about the same, maybe a little in favor of the STM, just because it is a much newer design, and it should give preferable results for video (which I could not witness with the 50mm STM).

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.