Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Tele, Telezoom and Prime lens
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 13, 2017 20:16:21   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
rattlesnakeron wrote:
Zoom lenses have a tendency to create lazy photographers. As a photography instructor for 35 years I have seen it happen over and over.


BS. If this were true, pros would have only primes. But the most used pro lenses are a holy trinity of zooms. On full frame digital or 35mm film:

14-24 mm f/2.8 (about 8% to 10% of all images)
24-70mm f/2.8 (1/2 of all images)
70-200mm f/2.8 (about 12% to 15% of all images)

There are similar trilogies for APS-C and Micro Four Thirds.

In the amateur world, more images are made with a 28mm (FF) perspective on an iPhone than with any other lens. And I can't think of a more inappropriate focal length for most of my work...

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 22:35:32   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=prime+lens&spf=1

Reply
Apr 14, 2017 00:45:32   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
rattlesnakeron wrote:
Zoom lenses have a tendency to create lazy photographers. As a photography instructor for 35 years I have seen it happen over and over.


What does that even mean?!
When I'm out in the field, or woods, or swamp, I usually have 2 cameras with me, both with zoom lenses covering from 24 to 560 mm, and I don't have to change lenses. How many prime lenses would I need to bring with me to cover that range?! My general purpose lens in both Canon and Nikon is a 28-300 zoom. Have you ever carried a 1.9 pound camera with a 3.7 pound lens attached for several hours while taking hundreds of photographs? Definitely not something a lazy person would do. A few weeks ago the wife and I were at the Philadelphia flower show. Mounted on her camera a EF 24-105L II lens, on mine the aforementioned EF 28-300L. We rode the train into Philadelphia on a day it snowed several inches. We shot hundreds of photos that day; photos of trains, photos from the train, photos of the city and mostly lots of photos from inside the convention center. Not once did I miss a shot I wanted because of not having the right lens and not once did I feel the coverage from my lens was inadequate. I wonder how many primes I'd have needed that day to get the photos I got and how many times I would have had to change lenses. In my humble opinion, folks who use quality zooms are smart and folks who lug an assortment of primes around on a walkabout shoot are, as bugs bunny would say, maroons.

Reply
 
 
Apr 14, 2017 09:10:07   #
HarryBinNC Loc: Blue Ridge Mtns, No.Carolina, USA
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
What does that even mean?!
<SNIP>In my humble opinion, folks who use quality zooms are smart and folks who lug an assortment of primes around on a walkabout shoot are, as bugs bunny would say, maroons.


Excellent! I wish I could have said that so eloquently!


Reply
Apr 14, 2017 09:16:38   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
HarryBinNC wrote:
Excellent! I wish I could have said that so eloquently!

Excellent! I wish I could have said that so eloqu... (show quote)


Thank you. I've always been a big fan of that silly wabbit. My favorite is when he says, aaaahhhh, what an ultra maroon.

Reply
Apr 14, 2017 10:36:09   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
What does that even mean?!
When I'm out in the field, or woods, or swamp, I usually have 2 cameras with me, both with zoom lenses covering from 24 to 560 mm, and I don't have to change lenses. How many prime lenses would I need to bring with me to cover that range?! My general purpose lens in both Canon and Nikon is a 28-300 zoom. Have you ever carried a 1.9 pound camera with a 3.7 pound lens attached for several hours while taking hundreds of photographs? Definitely not something a lazy person would do. A few weeks ago the wife and I were at the Philadelphia flower show. Mounted on her camera a EF 24-105L II lens, on mine the aforementioned EF 28-300L. We rode the train into Philadelphia on a day it snowed several inches. We shot hundreds of photos that day; photos of trains, photos from the train, photos of the city and mostly lots of photos from inside the convention center. Not once did I miss a shot I wanted because of not having the right lens and not once did I feel the coverage from my lens was inadequate. I wonder how many primes I'd have needed that day to get the photos I got and how many times I would have had to change lenses. In my humble opinion, folks who use quality zooms are smart and folks who lug an assortment of primes around on a walkabout shoot are, as bugs bunny would say, maroons.
What does that even mean?! br When I'm out in the ... (show quote)


Indeed!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.