Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
16-300 Tamron, 18-300 Sigma, or 18-300 Nikon?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Mar 25, 2017 12:10:20   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
OregonCoaster wrote:
Hello All,
I have been taking photographs, seriously, for about a year. I have a Nikon D5500, it came with two kit lenses, a 18-55 and a 55-300. I have been thinking I would like to consolidate to one lens. The three I have been looking at are the 16-300 Tamron, 18-300 Sigma, and 18-300 Nikon. Any thoughts? Can I expect the same/better/worse image quality with one (of the three) lenses oppose to the two kit lenses mentioned. Or would I just be looking at the convenience of not changing lenses? Thanks for the input.
Hello All, br I have been taking photographs, seri... (show quote)


Regardless of your final choice, if you want to trade you 2 kit lenses for the 1 lens give KEH Camera a call. They may buy the 2 lenses. Or B&H or Adorama also buy used lenses.

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 13:18:18   #
linelink
 
I have The Nikon 18-300 mounted on my Nikon D5500. I bought the 5500 for the articulating screen and it's very light weight. The Nikon 18-300 is still light weight enough when added to my camera. The difference in weight of Tamron, or Sigma is not noticeable enough to offset the quality of the Nikon lens. If you decide later on to sell the 5500 or your lenses, you will retrieve more money for both camera and lens. Take your time, and check eBay, for auctions on the 18-300. Like me, you may be able to get an open box deal on a new one, and you may be able to obtain one for around $500. Now, you will get all kinds of advice about about gray market and Nikon warranty service etc., but if you are like me, and an amateur, then go for price vs warranty. The pros are hard on equipment and may shoot 100 shots each day. I have an old Minolta and lenses from 40 yrs ago. They are like new. So, it's your call, but that's my two cents from someone who owns the lens you want and the same camera you already have.

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 13:27:38   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
OregonCoaster wrote:
Hello All,
I have been taking photographs, seriously, for about a year. I have a Nikon D5500, it came with two kit lenses, a 18-55 and a 55-300. I have been thinking I would like to consolidate to one lens. The three I have been looking at are the 16-300 Tamron, 18-300 Sigma, and 18-300 Nikon. Any thoughts? Can I expect the same/better/worse image quality with one (of the three) lenses oppose to the two kit lenses mentioned. Or would I just be looking at the convenience of not changing lenses? Thanks for the input.
Hello All, br I have been taking photographs, seri... (show quote)


Enter the 3 lenses in SEARCH on the forum and you'll find lots of opinions.

Reply
 
 
Mar 25, 2017 13:36:59   #
appealnow Loc: Dallas, Texas
 
I bought the Nikon 18-300 f.6.3 as a travel lens. I just didn't want to carry the extra weight of the f5.6 all day traveling. Frankly, I haven't used it much yet, so I can't comment on the quality.

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 13:47:34   #
taxman Loc: Cleveland, Ohio
 
billnikon wrote:
This is not even a question. OME original manufactures equipment. And in this case as in all cases like this one, you bought the Nikon for a reason, did you not? Then buy the Nikon lens for the same reason you bought the camera. Cause it's the best option. I have beat my Nikon to death over the past three years, the Tamron could never take a beating a keep on ticking like my Nikon. There is a night and day difference between Nikon and third party glass. Let me riddle you this, if the Tamron and the Nikon were the same price, which would you buy? IF you take out the money OME wins every single time cause it will always be the better option. Shop quality not price. You get what you pay for. Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.
This is not even a question. OME original manufact... (show quote)


As far as durability and longevity are concerned, I've been using a Tamron 18-270 for just about 6 years and it works flawlessly - very happy with it. Personally, I would not hesitate to upgrade to the Tamron 16-300.

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 15:07:52   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
taxman wrote:
As far as durability and longevity are concerned, I've been using a Tamron 18-270 for just about 6 years and it works flawlessly - very happy with it. Personally, I would not hesitate to upgrade to the Tamron 16-300.


That is what I did. LOVE

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 17:45:24   #
christinortham
 
I was excited to buy this lens even though I rented the Nikon 18-300mm and LOVED it. I was disappointed that it was pretty soft starting at around 200mm and really wasn't any better at 16mm than my stock 18-55mm. Unfortunately/fortunately, I took a wave on Lake Michigan and drowned the Tamron. Decided to spend the extra $300 on the Nikon. I am thrilled I did. Sharp as a tack, little to no softness at 300mm. Definitely recommend spending the extra money and getting the superior glass.

Reply
 
 
Mar 25, 2017 17:53:32   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
OregonCoaster wrote:
Hello All,
I have been taking photographs, seriously, for about a year. I have a Nikon D5500, it came with two kit lenses, a 18-55 and a 55-300. I have been thinking I would like to consolidate to one lens. The three I have been looking at are the 16-300 Tamron, 18-300 Sigma, and 18-300 Nikon. Any thoughts? Can I expect the same/better/worse image quality with one (of the three) lenses oppose to the two kit lenses mentioned. Or would I just be looking at the convenience of not changing lenses? Thanks for the input.
Hello All, br I have been taking photographs, seri... (show quote)


If you want to consolidate to just one lens only, I would suggest the Nikon DX 18-300mm. Although I have no qualms with third party lenses. For resale value, Nikon usually has the edge.

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 21:25:47   #
TucsonDave Loc: Tucson, Arizona
 
I have owned by Nikon D5300 for 9 months and have shot a lot of photographs and bought a couple of Nikon lens. I read a ton of reviews before buying anything and I always come back to Nikon. I have a local store that is competitive with mail order, I take lessons from them occasionally and never have any problems. Besides the kit lens 18-55 mm, I have a AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G and a AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR lens. The lens fit the camera, no adjustments needed. They just work for me. Obviously others have good success with some 3rd party lens. Try them out at your local store and then buy from them. Whatever you buy, the local shop should be able to help you take photographs that you love. That's when it is fun.

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 21:39:58   #
Pegasus Loc: Texas Gulf Coast
 
billnikon wrote:
This is not even a question. OME original manufactures equipment. And in this case as in all cases like this one, you bought the Nikon for a reason, did you not? Then buy the Nikon lens for the same reason you bought the camera. Cause it's the best option. I have beat my Nikon to death over the past three years, the Tamron could never take a beating a keep on ticking like my Nikon. There is a night and day difference between Nikon and third party glass. Let me riddle you this, if the Tamron and the Nikon were the same price, which would you buy? IF you take out the money OME wins every single time cause it will always be the better option. Shop quality not price. You get what you pay for. Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.
This is not even a question. OME original manufact... (show quote)


I think you mean to say OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer.)

I have the 18-300 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR. It's the more expensive and heavy lens. I like it just fine, but it's heavy and big. My current favorite that lives on the camera all the time is the super 18-140 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR. I also understand the 18-200 is an awesome lens, but I don't have that one. I really like my 18-140 and I run around with that one and the 35mm f/1.8G in my pocket for quick access as needed. My 18-300 stays at home unless it's specifically needed.

Reply
Mar 25, 2017 21:58:38   #
DStone Loc: Outside Winston-Salem, NC
 
Wow! How often in life does this happen? If you read through this topic, it is clear there are no losers here. The consensus seems to be "whatever you pick, for whatever reason you pick it, you're gonna be just fine". Ain't life grand?

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2017 02:30:29   #
don4u Loc: Southern California
 
I bought the Tamron 16-300 mm lens. It is a great tool. I have the Nikon D 5100 and with that lens it does the work. I wanted a lens that would cover a huge area and well it does it.

Reply
Mar 26, 2017 06:19:15   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Pegasus wrote:
I think you mean to say OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer.)

I have the 18-300 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR. It's the more expensive and heavy lens. I like it just fine, but it's heavy and big. My current favorite that lives on the camera all the time is the super 18-140 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR. I also understand the 18-200 is an awesome lens, but I don't have that one. I really like my 18-140 and I run around with that one and the 35mm f/1.8G in my pocket for quick access as needed. My 18-300 stays at home unless it's specifically needed.
I think you mean to say OEM (Original Equipment Ma... (show quote)


That is what I said, Original Manufactures Equipment, OME, you said OEM. It's the same thing.

Reply
Mar 26, 2017 09:31:41   #
MTG44 Loc: Corryton, Tennessee
 
I have the Tamron 16-300 and it sharp all the way through and great walk around lens.

Reply
Mar 26, 2017 13:58:02   #
pbfuller
 
Bought the Tamron and use it all the time on my D5000. I am considering an upgrade on the D5000 to a 7200 or 5600

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.