Another good Christian
Jan 31, 2017 13:34:52 #
Frank T wrote:
If we are going to exempt churches from paying tax... (show quote)
Yes, because churches provide no valuable social services at all.
Jan 31, 2017 14:13:25 #
Kombiguy wrote:
Yea, according to the Supreme Court, the first amendment does prohibit taxing churches.
*
Nor has the court said that the sun rises in the east, water is wet, etc. Some things the court knows in the same way you do
*******
The Scotus hasn't prohibited taxing churches. It said it is legal to exempt them. This issue they have ruled on, but they have not taken up the issue of the sun rising and setting maybe because it isn't in the constitution.
Jan 31, 2017 14:43:16 #
Jan 31, 2017 19:16:19 #
Kombiguy wrote:
Gee, I don't know. Maybe the part about "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." You know, the whole freedom of religion thing.
Wow. Are you really this stupid? How in the hell did you logically equate ending the special tax breaks for religious groups as "Respecting an establishment of religion"? Most people would see it as the opposite - that the establishment of special tax breaks for religious groups is what is 'respecting an establishment of religion.
Your "freedom of religion" equated to special tax breaks point is even more baffling. I'm quite frequently mystified by your "logic" whenever you talk about the Constitution.
Jan 31, 2017 19:19:34 #
Kombiguy wrote:
Remember, this is not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is intended nor established.
LOL! Are you joking? You actually think we might be assuming an attorney-client relationship with you??? You're a funny man.
You mean to tell me that you have in the past served as an attorney? Just wow. I guess all types have gone to law school. However, I couldn't imagine trusting you to be an attorney given your consistently screwy interpretations of the law.
Jan 31, 2017 20:25:19 #
Kombiguy wrote:
LOL what are you saying? You're not charging me?Generally speaking, the IRS considers a number of ... (show quote)
Jan 31, 2017 20:34:46 #
Keenan wrote:
I'm quite frequently mystified by your "logic" whenever you talk about the Constitution.
I'm not surprised. Your ignorance is not only invincible, it is apparently limitless.
Jan 31, 2017 20:35:45 #
Keenan wrote:
LOL! Are you joking? You actually think we might be assuming an attorney-client relationship with you??? You're a funny man.
You mean to tell me that you have in the past served as an attorney? Just wow. I guess all types have gone to law school. However, I couldn't imagine trusting you to be an attorney given your consistently screwy interpretations of the law.
You mean to tell me that you have in the past served as an attorney? Just wow. I guess all types have gone to law school. However, I couldn't imagine trusting you to be an attorney given your consistently screwy interpretations of the law.
That's quite alright. Aside from the fact that I avoided insane clients and imbeciles, you probably could not have afforded me.
Jan 31, 2017 20:36:22 #
green wrote:
LOL what are you saying? You're not charging me?
Consider it my pro bono for the month!
Jan 31, 2017 21:04:03 #
Kombiguy wrote:
That's quite alright. Aside from the fact that I avoided insane clients and imbeciles, you probably could not have afforded me.
You are aware, aren't you, that KKKeenan IS probably the only one on this forum who IS qualified to be on the Supreme Court don't you? Just ask him.
Jan 31, 2017 21:22:53 #
idaholover wrote:
You are aware, aren't you, that KKKeenan IS probably the only one on this forum who IS qualified to be on the Supreme Court don't you? Just ask him.
Strange...
You begged the admin to un-ban you from UHH by convincing him that you only wanted to utilize the photography part of the forum and were done trolling...
Immediately after you were allowed back on, you immediately ran back to the Attic and started your vile moronic trolling routine again...
1,800 posts since your re-infection of the forum December 11, and ALL have been stupid vulgar trolling comments in the Attic, and only 7 posts in the photography section of UHH.
Jan 31, 2017 21:31:44 #
Keenan wrote:
Strange... br br You begged the admin to un-ban y... (show quote)
So you regret that you little tattle-tale to admin was not permanent? No surprise here, back stabbing and cowardice seems to be your standard operating procedure.
Jan 31, 2017 21:37:09 #
phcaan wrote:
So you regret that you little tattle-tale to admin was not permanent? No surprise here, back stabbing and cowardice seems to be your standard operating procedure.
Like the typical immoral right winger you are, you couldn't care less about the fact that he was banned for violating the rules of the forum that he agreed to when he signed up.
I guess to you right wing hypocrites, breaking rules and violating laws aren't the problem. It's only getting caught that you have a problem with.
Phil, has anyone ever told you you are a pathetic man-child with severely stunted morality and maturity?
Oh, and you are also a disgusting hypocrite since you continue to self-identify as a "Christian."
"Another good Christian"
Jan 31, 2017 21:39:45 #
Keenan wrote:
Like the typical immoral right winger you are, you could care less about the fact that he was banned for violating the rules of the forum that he agreed to when he signed up.
I guess to you right wing hypocrites, breaking rules and violating laws aren't the problem. It's only getting caught that you have a problem with.
Phil, has anyone ever told you you are a pathetic man-child with severely stunted morality and maturity?
I guess to you right wing hypocrites, breaking rules and violating laws aren't the problem. It's only getting caught that you have a problem with.
Phil, has anyone ever told you you are a pathetic man-child with severely stunted morality and maturity?
Only you, but from you I consider it the highest form of complement. Thank You.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.