Jim_In_Plymouth wrote:
Got this last fall as a local favorite restored locomotive and train headed west of the Twin Cities for a fall outing. I have presented this one or two places and got a "meh" reaction. What am I missing?
Can't really see since there is no download to get a closer look.
Just quickly from my own opinion:
First the good, I like steam engines, you got a really good cloud of smoke and steam and the tones on it are good.
Now, the not so good
1. focus seems a bit soft on the loco, which to me is the main subject.
2. lots of details lost in the shadows on the loco
3. You could have gotten a closer crop, perhaps vertical with the loco and steam cloud as the major portion of the image with just enough of the cars and trees to set up the story line.
4. Since you are showing the whole train it would have been better to either be on the far side of the crossing so those signs and signals don't intrude on the image of the train or an alternate would be to be further back from the crossing along the tracks so those signs and signals become less intrusive due to distance behind the loco. A shaped vignette might help.
5. The overall image seems a bit flat and gray.
If you could post the original out of camera someone could tell more and work with it to illustrate.
To me, unless it is a shot of a car of special interest or a clear unobstructed view of the train and scene the loco is the center of attention and should be featured.
Quality isn't all it should be, the full file would give me more to work with, esp if in RAW but here is an illustration of some of my points:
1. cropped to portrait and got rid of the signs
2. opened up the shadows and tweaked the high lights & contrast
3. leveled the horizon (should have done that before I cropped, got some gray on right and bottom)
4. sharpened a bit