Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
Mirrorless camera suggestions? (Specs, price range, uses, etc., listed)
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 11, 2016 11:19:04   #
IvanL
 
For only $100 bucks more you can get the 18-55m lens for the A6000, and it is quite good. Its IQ surprised me.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 11:23:13   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
MtnMan wrote:
There are a number of Panasonic Lumix Micro 4/3 models like the above that can fit the bill. They come with different features, prices, and lens choices including the LX 100 with a fixed lens that might work.

I'm enjoying my GM5 with 12-32 lens because of its features, teeny size, and light weight. $459 at Adorama.

Note Panasonic has a free three year warranty offer on cameras and lenses going through next April. You need to find the form and submit with invoice. I found it after the 30 days from purchase they say it needs to be honored. I'm sending it in anyway to see what they do.
There are a number of Panasonic Lumix Micro 4/3 mo... (show quote)


Thanks--I've turned up several Lumix models that may work (it's actually amazing how many there are for roughly the same market), now I'll check out the GM5 as well. Good thought on the warranty as well.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 11:24:30   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
MtnMan wrote:
Ipad?


Interesting thought! Have no experience with those, however, I'll keep it in mind. Thanks again!

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 11:25:23   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
phlash46 wrote:
The LX 100 is more than up to this task!


Good to know, appreciate the first-hand info. Thanks!

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 11:35:31   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
Peekayoh wrote:
It's not a bad lens for your purposes.
Compensate for the low light with the built in flash.


Thanks for that vote, very helpful. And yes, while I personally despise the look of on-camera flash, for simple documentation it's certainly a possibility.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 11:37:13   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
Toment wrote:
16-50 is fine. Very compact and capable. That's like a24-75, very nice walk around.
Consider the 18-105 G for more reach, but the built in flash casts a shadow, just tilt it up for a bounce shot.
Great camera, manageable kit.
Have fun..


OK, another vote for the kit lens, at least for this work. That helps--thank you!

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 11:38:32   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
IvanL wrote:
For only $100 bucks more you can get the 18-55m lens for the A6000, and it is quite good. Its IQ surprised me.


OK, on B&H I saw a different second-lens option, but yours sounds more applicable. Many thanks for the input!

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 12:10:48   #
bkellyusa Loc: Nashville, TN
 
cabunit wrote:
Yes, looks as if it's shaping up that way. I tried to ask the specific question about the a6000, but you're right, needed to spell it out better. Thanks for your input.


There is nothing wrong with the Sony 1650 kit lens. All kit lenses have a bad reputation but it is much less deserved with the 1650. It is very good for what it is and has a motorized zoom if you want to take videos. If you want better it will cost you. Maybe the new 30mm Sigma 1.4 at $350.000 or the Sony's FE 28mm at $450.00.

It's worth noting that the A6000 is a nice camera. If you can start with the basic camera with the kit lens you can always upgrade the lenses when you can afford more. The camera though is good to go.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 12:21:16   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
bkellyusa wrote:
There is nothing wrong with the Sony 1650 kit lens. All kit lenses have a bad reputation but it is much less deserved with the 1650. It is very good for what it is and has a motorized zoom if you want to take videos. If you want better it will cost you. Maybe the new 30mm Sigma 1.4 at $350.000 or the Sony's FE 28mm at $450.00.

It's worth noting that the A6000 is a nice camera. If you can start with the basic camera with the kit lens you can always upgrade the lenses when you can afford more. The camera though is good to go.
There is nothing wrong with the Sony 1650 kit lens... (show quote)


Very helpful to have a first-hand evaluation, and you seem to validate what a few others have said. Appreciate your thoughts and your time--many thanks!

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 12:27:22   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
Everyone--I think I have enough to go on. Thanks so much for all your thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations. I hope I replied to all of you individually, but if I missed anyone, my apologies.

Take care. Y'all are the best!

Al

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 12:38:38   #
bkellyusa Loc: Nashville, TN
 
cabunit wrote:
Everyone--I think I have enough to go on. Thanks so much for all your thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations. I hope I replied to all of you individually, but if I missed anyone, my apologies.

Take care. Y'all are the best!

Al


What did you decide to do?

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 13:26:56   #
Impressionist
 
Was impressed with the Sony A6000 with kit lens when first bought a couple of years ago. Have since upgraded lenses and got adapters that have brought a closet full of Old lenses back to life. Have no idea where the kit lens went. The camera however continues to impress. Have cameras that are technically better but none more useful. At its current price there is no better buy.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 13:30:04   #
John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
Some have recommended the Sony a6000 but the price might be above his plan. How about the Soby a5000, it would be cheaper but shorter on the features. Would the compromises be worth it?

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 13:34:48   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
cabunit wrote:
Hoggers, I have a customer who needs a few mirrorless cameras in the $500-600 range. One of the intended uses is to capture sharp, READABLE information from posters (say, 2x3 feet) in a single frame, often in poor light (sometimes requiring ISO 3200 or greater). Format is not an issue, that is, either 4/3 or APS-C will work. I can research all the particulars at B&H, but I can't test the IQ.

For example, the Sony Alpha a6000 fits the bill in all respects, but the 16-50 kit lens gets some poor reviews, and buying just the body and adding a better lens is out of budget.

Specific questions for those with experience: Is the kit lens THAT bad? Is there a better choice in that approximate price range, such as the Lumix DMC-G7, that has better IQ with the kit lens?

Many thanks, folks!
Hoggers, I have a customer who needs a few mirrorl... (show quote)


I like Burkphoto and Cdouthitt suggestions and would add possibly the Olympus E-M10mrII.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 13:50:44   #
Peekayoh Loc: UK
 
No viewfinder so a non-starter IMO.
John_F wrote:
Some have recommended the Sony a6000 but the price might be above his plan. How about the Soby a5000, it would be cheaper but shorter on the features. Would the compromises be worth it?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.